The Art of Urban Landscape Photography

Near the turn of the Twentieth Century, Eugene Atget invented urban landscape photography. It wasn't intentional. Atget made a record of Paris, the old Paris disappearing with the advance of the industrial age, from the broad boulevards to the dreary avenues of prostitution.

Atget went into business in Montmartre, supplying his images as models for painters.

Like all art styles, urban landscape photography evolved. Some artists celebrated the cities, others, like Edward Hopper, saw alienation and menace. Gradually, realism took over, and we saw pictures of cities as they are, but in a more familiar way as populations shifted away from the countryside and into the city for work and security.

Today, we have two schools in urban landscape photography. In one, photographers show the cities as contructions, lines and junctions and contrasts. In the other, as you will see here, the photographers elevate Atget's tradition by becoming the artists themselves.

From the evolution of urban landscape photography, it easy to make the obvious connection and see how artistic conceptions have led to the way our cities look today.

New buildings began to take on cubist elements. Towers become less boxy, with curving external surfaces and asynchronous lines. Movements in the arts can easily be seen as inspirations for architecture, a craftsman's field often considered an art these days.

How things look has gained value against ideas about how things work. Esthetic elements are essential in everyday designs, if not dominate. We have come to see how art improves life by changing how we see things and expanding our understanding along visual pathways.

Deborah Julian's urban landscape photography can be a guide. Her painterly eye encourages us to see everyday everyday scenes, looked at differently, as visions of beauty and/or interest. Passing and Charles Bridge Early Morning are good examples. In both, she shows us a city scene that has passed through an artist's fine-tuned filter.