When a breed’s popularity increases it might become the first choice for owners with no prior experience with dogs. So before we put a label on an entire breed of dog describing them as ‘dangerous,’ let’s first ask, “What proportion of a breed’s owners is knowledgeable about dog training?” The absolute #1 factor that determines whether a dog will become dangerous is ownership (Fatal Dog Attacks, by Karen Delise). Regardless of the breed, the risk of dangerous attacks can be greatly increased due to improper human interaction such as neglect, fight training, lack of training, careless confinement, and lack of supervision.
If 88% of dog attack related fatalities are 2-year old children who were left unsupervised with a dog, where are the parents? Perhaps they trusted the neighbors pet because the dog was small or because it looked like a faithful Golden Retriever. I bet he seemed nice enough. Maybe they didn’t know that 77% of dog bites are from the pet of family or friends, 50% of which happen on the owner’s property (Statistics about dog bites in the USA and elsewhere).
All dogs are predatory by nature, and improperly managed confrontations can lead to injury from even the most well tempered dog. Even small dogs have sharp teeth, claws, and powerful muscles in their jaws and legs. Dogs of all sizes have mauled and killed humans, though a large dog is capable of inflicting damage more quickly. Statistics say that a non-neutered male is more likely to attack than a neutered one, or more so than any female. Yet you don’t say, “That’s a boy dog and he’s not fixed, so he must be dangerous!” Intact males are involved in 70-76% of reported dog bite incidents and represent 80% of dogs presented to veterinary behaviorists for dominant aggression (A community approach to dog bite prevention, Vet Med Today).
What proportion of dogs involved in acts of aggression against humans came from a known mother/father who exhibited such traits? Most statistics show the number of dogs in various breeds involved in attacks, but they do not show the ratio of dogs bred in a certain area involved in the attacks, which could help focus on a specific breeder or pet farm. As a specific breed’s popularity increases, many people start mating their dogs and selling the puppies, people who know nothing about breeding or genetics (who may not care). If we were to examine dangerous breeds by statistics, any popular breed may be more likely to show up do the sheer high numbers of how many dogs there are out there, but what are the ratios? Is it 13% of all large breeds attack? Or is it really only .00003%? Statistically, fatalities due to dog mauling is rare with a dog population of 79 million and less than 30 fatal attacks per year = .0000379% (Fatal Dog Attacks, by Karen Delise). You are five times more likely to be killed by a bolt of lightning than to be killed by a dog.
The risk of dog attacks can be greatly reduced with proper training. We need to shift some of the focus away from the animal, and assume responsibility as pet owners. Educating people on the importance of obedience training for young puppies and how to give proper care to our pets is the first step to changing the likelihood of animal attacks. Adults can help teach children ways to respect our pets, how not to provoke aggressive behavior, and to never approach a strange animal. You wouldn’t let your child go play unsupervised with a strange human, would you? Why should an animal be any different?