Wizzley
PopularLatestDiscussedEditor's Choice
AuthorsForum
Wizzley

A community of writers publishing stories worth your time — on the topics they know and love.

Explore

  • Popular
  • Latest
  • Discussed
  • Editor's Choice

Community

  • Top authors
  • New authors

Service

  • Help
  • Contact
  • Imprint
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

Check out our other international Webhaus communities!

Explore another site:English·Deutsch

© 2026 Webhaus LLC. All rights reserved.

Culture & SocietyHistory, Religion, PoliticsBeauty & FashionClothes, Hair, BodyCelebrationHolidays and OccasionsTravelVacations and ExcursionsWeddingsEverything but the groom
Article

A Line of Scandalous Women

Preachers might emphasise Jesus' descent from David, but he had certain women among his ancestry whose reputation was not for good moral behaviour.

The Middle East is an honour based society, in which a family or a person's reputation is extremely important. Jesus grew up and lived in this kind of society, but he was a radical who challenged conventional systems of status, favouring the poor and outcasts over the rich Sadducees, and criticizing the religious status system. While preachers rightly emphasise his descent, albeit distantly, from King David they overlook the scandalous women in his genealogy and the religious implications.

The genealogy.

There are two genealogies of Jesus, in Matthew's and Luke's gospels respectively. There is much overlap between them, but Matthew departs from Jewish custom by mentioning the name of some of Jesus' female ancestors. This was a peculiarity, as at that time when people knew not sperm and egg, they thought that the man contained the seed and the woman was merely the soil in which it grew, so why did you need to mention women? In fact, the Greek Aristotle had thought that women are humans who were defective, so a foetus becomes a female if it is "defective in species", a view held by Aquinas in the Middle Ages.  Nowadays we know better, but we only found out about the sperm and egg quite late in human history.

Furthermore, the women mentioned were not totally respectable. In fact there was some scandal attached to each one of them: Tamar guilty of adultery; Rahab, the harlot; Ruth, got  man by bedding him; and Bathsheba, adultery with king David. Then there is Mary, whose conception of Jesus gave cause for suspicion. In fact, Matthew is deliberately leading up to Jesus' conception by Mary,as he wants to show that God works through people who were not always regarded as fully respectable by society, though he emphasises Mary's innocence and asserts the belief in her virginal conception. Note that the Bible teaches the virginal conception, that Mary had not had sex when she got Jesus. This is sometimes confused with the immaculate conception, a specifically Catholic doctrine that Mary was conceived without stain of original sin, which is not taught in the Bible but is a doctrine developed by mediaeval Franciscans, particularly Duns Scotus,a leading Scholastic thinker.

The whole thrust of this passage is that being chosen by God does not depend upon an unsullied line of high social status or upon social status itself, but on the generous gift of God's grace, which sweeps aside human status systems like the dross that they are.

Jesus and women

  • The Jesus Women

    These twelve extraordinary first-person narratives are from women who were contemporaries of Jesus Christ. Each experienced him in a unique way and each became a disciple in her...

Advertisement

Tamar

This is a tragic woman whose tale is told in Genesis 38. Judah, one of Jacob's twelve sons, had  a son called Er, who had been married to Tamar, but he died leaving no heir and Tamar childless. Levirate law was clear. In these circumstances his brother Onan was to take the widow and give her children to preserve his brother's name. But he was a nasty character, who did not want children that were not his, so he practised coitus interruptus, so Tamar had no children, even  though she wanted them, and his brother's name was not preserved. God was annoyed, so he killed Onan. Judah, the patriarch,sent Tamar back to her father as a widow and promised that she would marry his even younger son. But he forgot to arrange the wedding, and some time passed.

By now Tamar's biological clock was ticking and she was becoming concerned. So she was forced to hatch a plan. She veiled herself and sat at the crossroads as a prostitute, waiting for Judah to pass. Judah passed and saw his chance for a quick sex session. She stayed veiled throughout the encounter. He then promised her a kid from the herd as payment, and she asked for his ring and staff as surety. He did so.When his servants brought the kid, she was gone, along with the ring. But by then she was pregnant.

The penalty for adultery was death, and it was adultery as she was betrothed. Judah found that she was pregnant and ordered her execution, but then she showed the ring and staff. She must have been back with the clan by that time. Judah realized the horror of his actions and to give him his due, withdrew the execution and ordered the marriage. Nine months later she had twins, one of whom became the distant ancestor of St Joseph.

Holiness does not depend upon social  factors, but on closeness to God.Tamar was a good woman driven to desperate straits. Matthew is showing that a holy person can come from a line that has something dispreputable in it

Women in the Bible

  • Women of the Bible: The Life and Times of Every Woman in the Bible

    This complete and insightful guide to the Bible's most famous and infamous, named and unnamed, women of faith covers the matriarchs, the prophetesses and queens, the women aroun...

Advertisement

Rahab

There are doubts as to where she fits into the genealogy. Matthew makes her a few generations before David, but The Book of Joshua suggests earlier than that. She was a harlot at Jericho, like many harlots at that time either a desperate widow or a slave forced into prostitution. But she seemed to have been quite alienated from her society.

Joshua, Moses' brutal successor, was preparing to attack Jericho, and sent spies, who stayed in the house of Rahab the harlot. They took a liking to Rahab, and she to them. So the spies hatched a plan with her, As a reward for her hiding the spies she and her family were spared when Joshua conquered the city. This was lucky, as the thuggish Joshua massacred everyone except the favoured harlot and her family.They had identified her house by the scarlet cord tied to the window, as agreed in the plan.

Let's face it. We are dealing with  harlot's revenge here. She was probably a slave girl forced into prostitution, and she hated every encounter.She might even have been a Hebrew, as there were many Hebrews in the Middle East at that period, socially deprived people on the edges of  society. She might have been a Hebrew woman taken as a slave and regularly raped. But the society that misused her paid heavily for their misuse.

Rahab

  • Pearl in the Sand: A Novel

    Can a Canaanite harlot who has made her livelihood by looking desirable to men make a fitting wife for one of the leaders of Israel? Shockingly, the Bible's answer is yes. Pearl...

Advertisement

Ruth

Ruth was a widow driven by desperation into sex for security.She was a Moabite, but her mother- in-law was Isaelite. During a bad time in Moab, adjoining Israel, the men of the family died. Her father-in- law, her husband and her sister's husband all fell and died, leaving the women bereft fo support. Naomi, the mother-in-law, decided to return to Israel, and her two daughters-in-law went with her. 

Desperately poor, they went into the territory of Judah, in the south of the country, where they found earnings as gleaners. In biblical law you could only reap crops once and then any grain that had fallen to the ground was for the poor. Ruth was doing backbreaking farm work folllowing the reapers, gleaning for grain. Night fell and they were to sleep in the fields. But Naomi hatched a plan. She told Ruth to lie besides Boaz, the landowner. The Bible is generally quite prim its talk of sex, but the meaning is clear. She went for sex and got it. Boaz took her to wife and gave a home to the other two, as Naomi had planned. Ruth, it is said, was the grandmother of king David. That king David's grandmother  had bagged his grandfather by sex was a bit disreputable.

Her story is told in the Book of Ruth. There is a political agenda behind this book. Written in the period after the return from exile, it was penned when the scribe Ezra was promoting his anti-racial intermarriage policy, that Jews should marry only Jews, and non-Jewish wives should be put away. He was a cruel and insensitive racist. But there was massive opposition, and the writer of the Book of Ruth penned the tale to show that Israel's greatest king was himself the result of a mixed marriage, a marriage with a low status woman who had to use sexual wiles to survive. Ruth is in many ways a nice little tale with a happy ending.

Ruth

  • The Book Of Ruth

    The Book of Ruth, is a triumphant love story in the face of adversity.This selfless journey of love and devotion is seen through the eyes of a young widow. Choosing to leave her...

Advertisement

Bathsheba

Generally classed as an adultress, she probably had no choice. She was the wife of King David's general, Uriah the Hittite. But while he was away giving battle to David's enemies, king David, sitting in his palace, saw Bathsheeba sunbathing on her  roof and fancied her. She was sent for. At that time when a king demanded sex from a  woman he got it, and her choice was very limited. This is what happened to Bathsheba .But David did worse. He had her husband sent to the heart of the battle where he was eventually killed. David could then take the woman into his already large harem. Again, she had no choice.

But David reckoned without the prophet Nathan, who challenged him about his behaviour. This was a key moment in political history, when a religious figure told a king that he was subject to the same moral law as anyone else was, and that God was not happy with what had gone on. David was slated for adultery and murder, and did penance. But Bathsheba gave birth to Solomon eventually, who became David's heir and was the ancestor of the royal line of Judah after David.

Bathsheba was a woman forced into an affair with the man who had her husband murdered, yet she is condemned for adultery. Note,however, that the prophet Nathan never condemns Bathsheba, he roundly condemns David. The prophet knew where power lay in the relationship.

Bathsheeba

  • Bathsheba: A Novel (The Wives of King David)

    Bathsheba is a woman who longs for love. With her devout husband away fighting the king's wars for many months at a time, discontent and loneliness dog her steps and make it fri...

Advertisement

Conclusion

The genealogy leads inexorably to Mary. Jesus was sometimes known as the Son of Mary, as there were always  doubts cast on his legitimacy. Mary had conceived him before she was finally married. In those days a woman who was betrothed was accounted wed, but the wedding was finalized when the man took her into his home. The Bible tells how Joseph, following his receipt of  dream, realized that the child was of the Holy Spirit and quickly took her into his home, thus providing the child with status in the eyes of the honour based society in which they lived.

The Bible is not condemnatory of these four women predecessors of Christ. It sees them as victims. Each of the disreputable women has a key place in the salvation history of Israel and was an ancestor of Christ. Matthew's gospel is showing that one's position in God's eyes depends not upon your social place, race or ancestry, but on divine gift and willingness to respond to God.

Updated January 31, 2014

Comments

frankbeswickJun 16, 2026

The trouble with the head of John the Baptist is there are several heads of John the Baptist with each head being sure that they have the true head. These traditions arose in the Middle Ages when monks keen on getting into the religious tourist trade decided to find a suitable skull and invented a story around it.

frankbeswickJun 16, 2026

The trouble with the head of John the Baptist is there are several heads of John the Baptist with each head being sure that they have the true head. These traditions arose in the Middle Ages when monks keen on getting into the religious tourist trade decided to find a suitable skull and invented a story around it.

DerdriuMarrinerJun 15, 2026

Thank you for your comment below in answer to my previous observation and question.

In a related, unrelated direction, is there a tradition as to where John the Baptist -- with or without his head -- is interred?

frankbeswickJun 14, 2026

Eve is not among these women, but anyway, both Adam a nd EVE WERE GUILTY.

DerdriuMarrinerJun 13, 2026

Thank you for your comment below in answer to my previous observation and question.

The House of David and therefore the Blue-Marble -- ;-D -- lineage of Jesus Christ descend from Adam and Eve.

Is Eve included among scandalous women according to our 21st-century imaginings and according to those of the people inhabiting biogeographically and temporally synchronously with Jesus Christ?

frankbeswickJun 12, 2026

Your name suggestions are credible, but the wording remains unknown.

DerdriuMarrinerJun 12, 2026

Thank you for your comment below in answer to my previous observation and question.

A movie might make what Jesus Christ manifested in his stick-writing the names of Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, and Bathsheba if the latter quartet mattered to the people of His time.

Would writing those four names work against, for, not at all?

frankbeswickJun 12, 2026

The language of Jesus' and his disciples was almost certainly Aramaic. Talitha kum is recorded in Mark's Gospel as a a coommand by Jesus. This was an Aramaic term..

DerdriuMarrinerJun 11, 2026

Thank you for your comment below in answer to my previous observation and question.

Is there any tradition as to what language he inscribed the sand with?

frankbeswickJun 11, 2026

We would love to know what he wrote in the sand, but we do not know.

DerdriuMarrinerJun 10, 2026

Thank you for your comment below in answer to my previous observation and question.

Are there any traditions as to what Jesus Christ articulated in his sand-writing afore he answered those accusing the woman in John 8:1-11?

frankbeswickJun 8, 2026

SAdly, there are none. But this is the case for much scriptural people. The Bible focuses on Jesus and a few named individuals.

DerdriuMarrinerJun 6, 2026

My observation and my question are about a scandalous woman albeit not among those in Jesus Christ's earthly-articulated lines.

Do any traditions deal with the woman described in John 8:1-11?

frankbeswickMar 27, 2024

There are no traditions concerning Joseph's death.

DerdriuMarrinerMar 26, 2024

Thank you!

It appears that ancient genealogies assert the male, the paternal lines.

Does that tendency express itself in burial places?

For example, is it known where Joseph died and where he was buried?

Would Joseph have preferentially been buried with his birth family or with his wife and children?

frankbeswickMar 26, 2024

Probably the same as other cultures. There are no traditions specific to Jews.

DerdriuMarrinerMar 25, 2024

Thank you!

Online sources describe Jewish culture as matchmaker-traditioned at least since Biblical times.

Is there any tradition as to what a prospective husband and his family looked for in a prospective bride?

Might family history and socioeconomic niche have been important?

(Perhaps audacious, self-confident chutzpah might have mattered, per the Ruth and the Tamar stories!)

frankbeswickMar 25, 2024

John of Damascus speaking in a sermon on the feast of Mary's dormition says that Joseph was a widower with children. He needed a wife and found one in Mary.

DerdriuMarrinerMar 25, 2024

The conclusive, last subheading alerts us to Jesus Christ acknowledged perhaps more as son of Our Lady Mary than of Joseph.

It calls to mind the song Joseph by Georges Moustaki (May 3, 1934-May 23, 2013). The Egyptian-French singer expressed at a concert his long-time sympathy for Joseph. He ended his song with these words:

Parfois je pense à toi, Joseph (Sometimes I think of you, Joseph)
Mon pauvre ami, lorsque l'on rit (My dear [literally "poor"] friend, when they laugh)
De toi qui n'avais demandé (about you who asked)
Qu'à vivre heureux avec Marie (only to live happily with Mary).

Is there any tradition as to why their engagement?

(The Moustaki song mentions Our Lady Mary as

la plus jolie [the prettiest]
Parmi les filles de Galilée [Among the young girls of Galilee]).

frankbeswickMar 23, 2024

No. There is none.

DerdriuMarrinerMar 23, 2024

Thank you!

Levirate marriage concerns a brother marrying his dead brother's wife.

Is there an ancient term for a sister marrying her dead sister's husband?

frankbeswickMar 22, 2024

Some people would reckon descent from the biological father, but others reckon it from the mother.

frankbeswickMar 22, 2024

Some people would reckon descent from the biological father, but others reckon it from the mother.

DerdriuMarrinerMar 22, 2024

You're welcome!

You mention, in answer to my previous question, that "The genealogies are not considered reliable" because of a possible levirate marriage.

Might it be known when and with whom such a marriage occurred?

How would a levirate marriage render reconstructed genealogies unreliable?

frankbeswickMar 21, 2024

Thanks for telling me I wrote levirate l e v I r a t e.

DerdriuMarrinerMar 21, 2024

Thank you!

Online sources correlate "levitate" with ascending without physical support to float in, move through air.

Did the spell checker, ;-{ without your consent or knowledge ;-{, displace your perhaps intended "levirate"?

English Wikipedia gives "levirate" the meaning of a man marrying his brother's widow.

frankbeswickMar 20, 2024

The genealogies are not considered reliable, as possibly a levitate marriagevwasvinvolvedvsomewhere in one of the bloodlines.

DerdriuMarrinerMar 20, 2024

The GotQuestions site of Your Questions, Biblical Answers deals with the question "What was Mary's lineage?"

The aforementioned site explains, by Matthew 3:23 and 3:34 respectively, Joseph as son of Eli and Mary as descendant of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

It features Joseph as Eli's son -- since Matthew 1:16 explains Joseph as Jacob's son -- through the former's marriage to Our Lady Mary, whom it features as Eli's daughter.

Is the above explanation actually making Joseph Eli's son-in-law, not his son?

frankbeswickMar 20, 2024

He does not mention many, but Mark is purely apostolic recollections.

DerdriuMarrinerMar 19, 2024

The first subheading, The genealogy, attributes to Matthew astute awareness of female ancestry behind the Holy Father.

Did Mark have that awareness?

JoHarringtonApr 1, 2014

This sounds fascinating, but I've got part way through and had to admit defeat. It's 3am and I'm brain dead. I'll be back tomorrow to read it properly.

MiraFeb 5, 2014

Nice read, Frank! I enjoyed the tales and your comments around them.

frankbeswickJan 31, 2014

Christians have always regarded Mary very highly, and the term ark of the covenant is properly hers, as the ark was the bearer of God's presence, as was she. As Israel was represented as a virgin awaiting her groom, Mary represents the virgin Israel in the scheme of salvation. Her conception by God was therefore a key part of salvation history.

Yet she was not free of suffering, the sword of sorrow---- Her reputation was attacked, as I pointed out in the article, and slanderers spread the rumour that she had had an affair with a soldier called Panthera, a pun on parthenos, the Greek for virgin and that she had got Jesus thus.

ologsinquitoJan 31, 2014

HI Frank, Mary was absolutely perfect in every way, but the other woman of the Bible were not. I'm always shaking my head in amazement at some of these Old Testament stories and all of the bad behavior. But God is so merciful He still sent his only Son to be Our Savior.

frankbeswickJan 31, 2014

You are absolutely right about Onanism, but to take the story as an attack on contraception is the wrong intepretation. The sin of Onan was denying his brother the perpetuation of his name, which was his means of immortality, in the view of the Semites of that period.

KathleenDuffyJan 31, 2014

Very interesting and sympathetic article. Now I understand where the word 'Onanism' came from!
frankbeswick
frankbeswick
436 articles
★ Editor's Choice
FollowMessage

Related articles

  • Who was Jesus
  • Ministry in the church:women bishops
  • Women of the Gospels
  • Doctor of the Church: John Henry Newman