From early in his life Leo seemed to have been drawn to the priesthood. Rejecting the secular clergy of his own diocese to join a religious order he joined the Augustinian friars. These were not founded by St Augustine, but by a founder who was inspired by the ideas of St Augustine. Friars are not monks. Whereas monks dwell in monastic communities and are very much confirmed in their commitment to stability, which means that they are not very mobile, Friars, be they of the Augustinian order, Franciscans, Carmelites or Dominicans, are mobile, and are much more likely to move around for the sake of religious works.
He was a scholarly man and in his early years managed to study for qualifications at three institutions universities, and acquired a degree in mathematics along with theological qualifications. . The level of education that he acquired in the intense course of study that he underwent will have stood him in good stead for his future ministry.
The mobility demanded of these friars led Leo to become a missionary and he was called to work at the Augustinian friars' mission in North Peru. There he would spend the remaining years until he was summoned to Rome, , and it seems that he saw Peru as the place where he would spend the rest of his life. We can infer this from the fact that he took up Peruvian citizenship, though he kept his American citizenship. Leo was to work as a missionary for a long time, but he spent much of his time performing the role of seminary tutor, educating candidates for the priesthood, and he also performed other official functions on church tribunals. The work of a missionary is very arduous. Besides his work as a seminary tutor and work in dealing with church tribunals, a task for which he used his doctorate in canon law, he did the routine work of a missionary, which involved his driving to remote communities in the Andes, providing priestly services and delivering aid. Missionaries have to be versatile, and often Leo had to repair his own vehicle. Sleeping rough in remote chapels or villages became part of his life, and he would at times have to sleep on a mattress on the floor. He would have been quite familiar with the presence of rats in some of his sleeping places.
Further educational endeavours were to be beneficial to his future ministry, though he was not fully cognizant of the full significance of his studies, which would benefit him in his future ministry. This was his talent for languages. Being of mixed ethnicity he was exposed to various languages, ie, English and French from early years, becoming fluent in both. His work in South America led him to become fluent in Spanish, and along with that he picked up Portuguese. His eventual transfer to Rome to work in the Vatican led him to develop his competence in Italian. Catholic theological study led him to develop his knowledge of Latin, though he is not verbally fluent in that tongue. The number of Germans resident in certain South American countries meant that the demands of the pastoral ministry led him to acquire some competence in German.
He returned to the USA in the year 1999, as prior of the Augustinian's Chicago based province, in effect leader of the American Augustinians, where he had to take responsibility for dealing with an abusive priest, whom he took into the Augustinians' house, to act as the man's supervisor. This was not the happiest task, and later the culprit was ejected from the priesthood. But in 2001 Leo was appointed for the first of two six year spells as superior general of the Augustinians, a role that gave him a woldwide role supervising the whole Augustinian order. This worldwide remit was the sign of things to come.
Comments
The regnal name is the personal choice of the elected cardinal.
The third paragraph to the first subheading, The candidate, begins with "Leo's choice of his regnal name."
Is the papal name impelled only by its bearer or is it indicative of such input as from Vatican cardinals?