Pontius Pilate never imagined the role in history that he would play. He did not come from a great family, but a middle ranking one, so scholars believe. The Pontii were of the social class between the [high ranking] Patricians and the [[low ranking] Plebeians. They were of the equestrian class, and were not even truly Roman, as they were Sabines, members of a Latin tribe who had been subjected by Rome centuries before.
Nothing is known of his early life, but he almost certainly followed the standard career path for an aspiring person of his social rank, which invariably began with military service, in his case probably on the Rhine, which is where the action was. The name Pilate may be derived from pilum, meaning javelin, so it is possible that Pontius may have been adept with this weapon. He must have been a successful soldier, though he was not famed for any great deeds, otherwise he would not have had advancement.
Advancement depended upon one's getting the support of people powerful at the court of the emperor, who at this time was Tiberius. Some scholars have suggested that Pilate might have been a protege of Seianus [Sejanus] a freeman who had risen to favour at Tiberius' court, but who was later executed for an ambitious and totally unrealistic scheme to assassinate Tiberius and become emperor. This is a possibility, but is unprovable.
Advancement in imperial service was lucrative. Officials were expected to keep order and ensure that the flow of taxes was maintained, and they had the role of dispensing justice, which involved the right to pass the death penalty. But tax collection offered opportunities for profit, and officials could become rich on the process. As long as they kept order! The taking of bribes was not unknown.
Pilate was not the governor. He was a mere prefect or procurator, subject to the Roman governor of Syria. This meant that Pilate did not have legionary troops at his disposal. Instead he had auxiliary troops, more lightly armed than legionaries. Some auxiliaries were cavalry. John's Gospel mentions that the Chiliarch [literally commander of a thousand cavalry] was present at Jesus' arrest. Jesus was speared by a lancea [lance] a cavalry weapon. There were probably other troops at Pilate's disposal, but we do not know who they were.
Governing Judea was a job, but Pilate disliked Jerusalem. It was crowded, and replete with people who hated him. He preferred to reside at Caesarea, on the warm Mediterranean coast, away from Judea's sometimes cold holy citadel. But he had to go to Jerusalem for major festivals, to keep public order in a politically unstable country. There he would stay in Castle Antonia, safe from trouble. It was at one Passover festival sometime in the early thirties, maybe 31 AD, that he set off from Caesarea on a routine journey that would cement his place in history. It is known as moral luck, your reputation depending on events beyond your control; and Pilate's moral luck had just run out.


Comments
frankbeswickFeb 3, 2024
DerdriuMarrinerFeb 2, 2024
In fact, I used Notovitch and it worked.
(How would a spelling check get Motovitch from Notovitch?!)
frankbeswickFeb 1, 2024
DerdriuMarrinerFeb 1, 2024
Hemis and Motovitch work!
frankbeswickFeb 1, 2024
frankbeswickFeb 1, 2024
DerdriuMarrinerFeb 1, 2024
Putting in the search term Himmis manuscript only brought up hummus recipes!
What else might I put in -- apart "Himmis manuscript" -- to access this information?
frankbeswickJan 27, 2024
DerdriuMarrinerJan 27, 2024
The fifth paragraph to the second subheading, Stepping into the cauldron, indicates that "Pilate must have heard of Jesus, and he would have had Jesus spied on."
Jesus Christ surely must have known about such spies, correct?
frankbeswickJan 26, 2024
DerdriuMarrinerJan 26, 2024
So crucifixion tended to be a Roman-choice death penalty even as stoning tended to be a Jewish-choice death penalty, correct?
Would crucifixion have been "invented" by Roman authorities or would it have been "borrowed" from some other culture, such as the Phoenician?
frankbeswickJan 20, 2024
DerdriuMarrinerJan 19, 2024
Was there one form of death penalty?
If not, would officials such as Pilate have full right to determine which death penalty applied?
frankbeswickMay 27, 2022
DerdriuMarrinerMay 27, 2022
Is there any suggestion anywhere as to Pontius Pilate's wife's family background and social rank? Would it be assumed that she exhibited the same class and ethnicity as her husband?
frankbeswickFeb 21, 2022
blackspanielgalleryFeb 21, 2022
frankbeswickFeb 20, 2022
DerdriuMarrinerFeb 19, 2022
Do you know why it is that the Coptic and Ethiopian Churches believe in the conversion of Pilate and his family? It intrigues me since it's perhaps a logical evolution from family concerns before the Crucifixion and because I wonder what the evidence or the persuasive factors are.
frankbeswickFeb 19, 2022
Not everyone connected with Seianus was punished, but only those implicated in the plot.
DerdriuMarrinerFeb 19, 2022
As I've mentioned previously, the computer does not cooperate sometimes with clarity for smaller images. What context draws such a beautiful, big cross resting against a stone wall and perhaps on a stone floor, not on the ground?
It's interesting that Pilate had the possible association with Seianus and yet did not suffer when the latter was executed. It looks like the Romans may not have assumed necessarily guilt by association. Perhaps they placed Pilate among people who want to do something with their lives and take advantage of opportunities for advancement without committing themselves to their mentors.