The Jewish faith and by implication the whole Abrahamic tradition is based on a few significant events, one of which is the magnificent theophany of Sinai. Sinai, which has not been positively identified is thought to be one of a cluster of peaks reaching 9000 feet in the Sinai desert. The Hebrews, under Moses and Aaron, had fled from slavery in Egypt and were making for the mountain, which for them seems to have been a holy place, aided, by strange coincidence, in all probability, by the smoke and fires of yet another mountain, the volcano Thera, the wreckage of which is the present day island cluster of Santorini.
It was at Mount Sinai that the theophany occurred that shaped the history of the Jews, the faith from which not only modern Judaism, but both Christianity and Islam arose. It was at Sinai that Moses ascended the mountain to receive the stone tablets were inscribed with the main tenets of the law, the keeping of which constituted the Hebrews' side of the covenant with God. The covenant that God would be the Hebrews' [lsrael's] God in return for keeping God's law has been fundamental to Israel's identity and religious thought in that time. The concept of the New Covenant is fundamental to the story of Jesus and his mission. The Jewish Passover and the Christian Eucharist are celebrations of the original and new covenants respectively.
No account of worship on hills and mountains in the Holy Land could fail to mention high places, which were hill top shrines used for sacrifices and feasts. These ancient sites were local places of worship, but they fell into disfavour when King David centralised sacrifice in Jerusalem and dwindled until the exile, when rabbinic Judaism which worshipped in synagogues replaced the remaining few of them.
The New Testament continues the mountain theme, as it begins with Jesus' sermon on the mount. The parallel with the giving of the old covenant and law on Mount Sinai and Jesus' sermon is clear. Just as God sends the old law symbolized by the commandments on Sinai, so Jesus, God's Son and messenger, presents the new law symbolized by the eight beatitudes on the mountain. A great religious change is signaled. It seems likely that Matthew includes teaching material in the Sermon that was uttered on other occasions if it fits into the sermon, and we cannot prove that there was a real sermon on the mount. But in a hilly place such as Palestine hills are hard to avoid. So it is reasonable to judge that Jesus gave a sermon from a hillside.
The parallel between the Sinai theophany and the sermon on the mount is that God speaks from the mountain to give his law. The implication is that Matthew's gospel is presenting Jesus as God's representative among humankind, his son. The differences are that at Sinai was that there was a thunderous storm, signifying God's power, whereas Jesus speaks in a normal preaching style without spectacular demonstrations. This is in line with the tradition of Elijah in the cave, but more about that tradition later.
Comments
United Nations definitions tend to be accepted as binding.
Thank you for your comment below, in answer to my previous observation and question.
The Adventure-dot-com site cites the United Nations Environmental Programme distinction between hills and mountains that "any peak above 8,200 feet (2,500m) is a mountain; as is any outcrop of 4,900-8,200 feet (1,500-2,500m) with a slope of at least 2°; as is a peak of 3,300-4,900 feet (1,000-1,500m) with a slope steeper than 5° or a local elevation range above the surrounding area of at least 300m for a 7km radius."
Does that definition defer to British Isles-ers east-ponder definitions?
(The United States Geological Survey, according to online sources, expresses no official difference between hills and mountains!)
As far as I know it is fiction, but there is a grain of truth. Leith Hill is the highest point in South East England, at 960 feet. So the locals built a forty foot tower to take the height to a thousand feet. I have been up it once.
Thank you for your comment below, in answer to my previous observation and question.
Online sources describe the film The Englishman that went up a hill and down a mountain as fictionalized and the village Ffynnon Garw as fictitious.
Sources online give the film ending as the villagers having their mountain held biogeographically as a mountain by intra- and extra-Welsh standards. The Ffynnon Garw-ers increase the height by including rock piles at the hill (to some)/mountain (to them) top!
Is such a pile-up fiction also or might that make a hill a mountain in real life?
No, I am not a great film goer
Thank you for your comment below, in answer to my previous observation and question.
Matt Rosenberg, in Difference between hills and mountains, updated July 17, 2024, for ThoughtCo-dot-com, discusses the film The Englishman that went up a hill and down a mountain, from 1995 and with actor Hugh Grant.
That film features cartographers identifying as a hill what Welsh villages identify as a mountain.
Might you have seen the aforementioned film?
Possibly. It is also worth noting that many languages do not distinguish between hills and mountains.
Thank you for your comment below, in answer to my previous observation and question.
The fourth paragraph to the first subheading, Mountains and worship, advises us that "in a hilly place such as Palestine hills are hard to avoid. So it is reasonable to judge that Jesus gave a sermon from a hillside."
The previous paragraph considers that "No account of worship on hills and mountains in the Holy Land could fail to mention high places, which were hill top shrines used for sacrifices and feasts. These ancient sites were local places of worship, but they fell into disfavour when King David centralised sacrifice in Jerusalem and dwindled until the exile, when rabbinic Judaism which worshipped in synagogues replaced the remaining few of them."
Might Jesus Christ have merged the ancient and the contemporary by moving respectively around high places but high places -- such as hills ;-D -- never so high as ancient musterings around, in, on mountains?
There were few significant low places in Palestine.
Well observed.