Seeing a ghost

by frankbeswick

Many people sees strange things, but the question is how you interpret them.

This article has been motivated by the account given by a particular individual, who underwent a strange experience. What do you do when you awake in the night and see a figure staring at you in your own bedroom? It then disappears very suddenly. Is it a ghost, the remnants of a dream, or something out of the ordinary? You were not taking drugs or drunk, you are not insane or in the habit of hallucinating at night. You are not willing to jump to conclusions about ghosts, so what do you think about what you "saw"?

Image courtesy of manolofranco

The Experience

I will call him Freeman, for he wishes not to be identified, but he tells of awakening one night last week [late November 2016]  to   a strange experience. I can vouch for the authenticity of his tale, as I  consider him trustworthy. Let us hear his words.

"There is nothing odd about my house, which is just over a hundred years old; there is no brooding presence or strange feeling. In fact, it is a place at peace with itself, exuding an atmosphere of peace, a place where I and others are comfortable and in  which nothing odd has been seen. Until a few nights ago."

" My wife and I are comfortable living where we are, and we have no plans to  go elsewhere. A few nights ago we were both in bed, and she sleeps the sleep of the just.I don't, but I plead the fifth amendment on that one. I often awaken at night, and this time, when lying and enjoying the warmth of the bed I sensed a presence in the room,  to my left. I looked across to the left and saw an old woman smiling down at the bed. She was vivid, short, round face, curly grey hair. I was shocked into full alertness, and as that happened she disappeared. I have seen nothing since. But what struck me was that she was completely clear to me, as if she was not lit by the faint light that filters in through the curtains. I  am not sure of what I saw, and I am not going to jump to conclusions. Did I even see anything at all. I really don't know."  

"What is certain is that there was no sense that there was anything evil present. This was not a dark entity. What intrigues me was that I sensed that there was someone present before I saw the apparition. I had not been dreaming of anything at the time."

Interpretation.

Let us have a look at some environmental factors. Freeman had drunk two pints of ale-strength drink several hours earlier. He was not drunk and next morning suffered no hangover. He works, but was not overworked or under any stress, and his relationship with his wife, who still does not know of the experience, hence his anonymity in this article, is good. There are no marital problems. Freeman has never had psychotic experiences and does not suffer hallucinations.  He is very well educated and not prone to jump to conclusions. The absence of any factors that suggest hallucinatory experiences mean that skeptics cannot easily resort to claims of drunkenness or temporary insanity, hallucinations and so on, the standard and rather tired explain-all  explanations of the strange and extraordinary that in explaining everything explain nothing. 

It is quite conceivable that a person awakening from a dream might find that the dream imagery persists into  the early stages of consciousness, and I suggest that this explains quite a few sightings at night, but Freeman was awake and was definitely not dreaming of anything. We might, however, observe that he was jolted into full alertness, so there is a possibility that he was not fully awake, and the edge of sleep can be a strange time, so a visual phenomenon that was the product of his own mind cannot be ruled out, and Freeman agrees, which is why he has not drawn a definite conclusion on what he saw. 

A  skeptical escape route will often be that he was ill and therefore hallucinating. Certainly,fevers, which cause high temperatures, are known cause hallucinations, and Freeman had one while an infant, but in this recent case he was not sick in any way whatsoever and has been for a long time in good health. He is not taking any illegal drugs and has no medications that produce hallucinatory side effects.  

While he admits that once or twice in the past he has sensed presences, these experiences have never included anything hallucinatory. This shows us that his mind is not  given to express his experiences in terms of visual hallucinations

The light in the room was at quite a low level, but there was nothing unusual about the light conditions, no passing headlights that interplay with the shadows in the room, and at no time in the past in that room has there been any visual apparition or anything seeming to be one. This gives the lie to another skeptical escape route, that he was gullible. A gullible person would have taken the experience at face value, but Freeman has not done so. He is not gullible.  

Tentative Conclusions

Freeman will not say that he has seen a ghost, but he rejects the easy skeptical explanations of what he saw, which don't work in this case. They explain away rather than explain. He is prepared to accept that he was imagining the vision,  as it was night time and he had been sleeping. But he points out that nothing like this had happened to him before and has not happened since. 

It could be an hallucination, but what if it is genuine and he has really experienced something supernatural? Skeptics may sneer at the possibility, but as they sneer at anything out of the ordinary,  their sneers simply become worn out, debased currency, a barrier to progress in the growth of wisdom and understanding

The first and most important strategy to follow when you see something strange is not to freak out or panic. In Freeman's case there was nothing harmful. Keep your self-control and remember, the time to get worried is if you encounter a ghost which can pack a punch, and so far this has not happened to anyone. The old lady, if she existed, would not have packed a punch in life, so why should she in death?

But as  Freeman says, you need to question yourself. Why did you have that  experience at that time. You might not be able to find a physical or medical reason, but you should be open-minded to the fact that there might be one. Of course, skeptics demand open-mindedness of everyone else. As you can see,I am no friend of die-hard skeptics, just as I am a critic of gullibility. 

You need to ask yourself if the experience is genuine, and if it is what does the apparition mean? Is it an earthbound spirit? If so, how do you get it to move on? As a Christian I would rely on prayer to achieve this. Might it be a visitant, an apparition that is not a feature of the property,but is considered to be a spirit  returning to  where they dwelt in life. Freeman does not know, and I am not going to  draw any conclusions, but I invite your comments on this matter.  

Updated: 11/27/2016, frankbeswick
 
Thank you! Would you like to post a comment now?
15

Comments

Only logged-in users are allowed to comment. Login
frankbeswick on 12/19/2023

The audio element would have been counter productive. County Mayo was undergoing an argument about language, whether to use Irish or English. Our Lady's silence spoke volumes. She was not taking sides. The absence of an olfactory element at Knock indicated that scents have nonrevelatory function.

DerdriuMarriner on 12/19/2023

Thank you!

Might there be a word for a scented or an audio equivalent of a ghost or of a spirit?

For example, what if my favoritest miracle at Knock -- and I mean no blasphemy or disrespect or facetiousness here -- had had an audio or a scented manifestation?

frankbeswick on 12/19/2023

There is no agreement. We all have a spirit, but a ghost is a visual manifestation that reveals a deceased person or occasionally animal. A spirit may be an angel or demon or a nature spirit.

DerdriuMarriner on 12/18/2023

The introductory paragraph employs the word ghost.

What is the difference between a ghost and a spirit, according to eastern-ponders?

frankbeswick on 04/11/2023

The pigs were in the pagan territory of Decapolis, where
Jewish rules were not followed.hence the inhabitants ate pork.What Jesus knew about science is unclear.

DerdriuMarriner on 04/10/2023

Your comment of 12/03/2016 contains the observation that "In the tale of the Gerasene demoniac the evil spirits are clearly operative in the world, and hence not in Hell. They plead with Jesus not to send them into the pit, and he allows them to enter pigs."

Is not the pig deemed an unclean animal in the socio-economic times in which Jesus Christ lived?

Research reveals that animal viruses such as bird and Spanish flu spread to humans through intermediation of pigs.

Was there a cultural suggestion somewhere, were we given a reason somewhere as to why Jesus permits evil spirits to domicile in pigs (which non-Jews and non-Muslims eat)?

As the Son of God -- and I mean this not at all facetiously -- would Jesus not know that someone could get sick from being around those evil spirit-housing pigs or from eating them?

frankbeswick on 12/23/2016

I put the story to a friend, who told me that her young daughter, aged four, had a similar experience. She brushed it off until a few weeks later when looking at a family photo album she showed the little girl a photograph of her own grandmother, whereupon the child said "That's the old lady. " My friend is adamant that she had never shown the child a picture of the grandmother before. Nothing can be concluded with any certainty from this parallel, but the fact that Freeman's experience is not a one-off instance does give food for thought.

frankbeswick on 12/04/2016

BSG, your colleague's view that the figure that you saw was illusory may be right or wrong, but it comes from a process of reasoning whose assumptions he did not share with you. I suspect that he takes the Enlightenment world-view that believes that matter is all there is or that mind is merely an epiphenomenon dependent upon matter that exists but briefly, if at all and cannot survive the death of its body. In this view ghosts must be illusory. Right or wrong,people need to be clear to you about where their advice is coming from.

frankbeswick on 12/03/2016

The Catholic Church does not deny the existence of ghosts,but makes no issue of them. Look at what Jesus says in Luke 24, that a ghost does not have flesh. At no point does he tell the apostles that there are no ghosts. Have we not realized that our view of the afterlife as a limited number of places [Heaven, Hell, Purgatory and Limbo] is unscriptural? In the tale of the Gerasene demoniac the evil spirits are clearly operative in the world, and hence not in Hell. They plead with Jesus not to send them into the pit, and he allows them to enter pigs. Whatever we think of this strange story, we are shown that the spirits are at loose in the world, we have a picture of Jesus who does not wish to send even the evil ones into the pit, which I take to be hell. This story does not fit with the simplistic eschatology which teaches that there are the four places that I have mentioned which provide the destiny for all spirits upon death.

frankbeswick on 12/03/2016

In England we sometimes joke about pleading the fifth amendment, which we know about and have heard characters in American films claim. [I wish we did have a constitution like yours.] The person concerned is a British person and has led an innocent life.He was speaking in a jocular way.


You might also like

Paranormal Society of New Orleans Goes Ghost Hunting the Jiman...

The Paranormal Society of New Orleans set out to communicate with gay fire vi...

Investigating the Antigonish Fire Spook Haunting

A poltergeist seemed intent upon burning down the MacDonald Farm in Caledonia...

How Ghost Pictures Can Be Faked

The paranormal can be scary, although most of the time it can be explained. A...


Disclosure: This page generates income for authors based on affiliate relationships with our partners, including Amazon, Google and others.
Loading ...
Error!