Jesus did not go round Judea claiming to be the Son of God, and when, sitting on the hillside above Caesarea Phillippi he asked the apostles who men said that he was, he received a variety of answers. He was a prophet reincarnated, possibly Isaiah or Jeremiah, even John the Baptist, but no one said that they or anyone else regarded Jesus as divine. When Simon Peter told Jesus that he thought him the Christ, the messiah, there were no divine meanings to that term, and it denoted one holy in God's sight sent to save Israel.
Many people try to pigeonhole Jesus into pre-existing categories: he was a prophet, a story teller, a teacher of wisdom,a revolutionary,a rabbi, and the apostles were no exception to this tendency. Yet Jesus did not fit comfortably into the categories in which people placed him. He was all of them, yet more. There were experiences that seemed to draw on the understanding to transcend existing categories through which Jesus was seen, but the understanding lagged behind the experience and the full apprehension took time to mature.
Let us look at some of them. There was the transfiguration,[Mark 8] the time on Mount Tabor [so tradition has it] when Jesus seemed to glow with light. A sense of being in the presence of bright white light sometimes happens in a religious experience, but for the three apostles present Jesus was not having a religious experience, he was the religious experience, and he was being affirmed by the presence of God. This was a powerful indication that Jesus was someone special. Furthermore, his Word seemed to have power to command. In Mark 2 he displays unusual knowledge of the origins of the paralyzed man's condition, and his word of command touches the depths of the man's soul, forgiving his sins, an action that only God can do. We see the same power of the word in the case of Jairus' daughter in Mark 5, where he speaks to a clinically dead girl and restores her to consciousness.
He conducted himself as one with authority, and as Neil Wright, an Anglican bishop, says in Who Was Jesus, Jesus behaved as though he was in charge. This is confirmed by Bornkamm [writing in Jesus of Nazareth] who says that he was one who had innate authority.Jesus was therefore a big personality with an imposing charismatic presence. Furthermore,in Mark's Gospel we are told that unlike his fellow rabbis who taught by referring back to other rabbis, Jesus taught on his own authority, a practice that upset the religious and intellectual establishment of Israel at the time. But this makes him a challenge, you either stand for him or against him, but you cannot be neutral, so there were people who loved and committed to him, and there were others who were bitterly opposed. You either loved him or hated him, but you could not ignore him.
To be one of Jesus' disciples was to walk with a powerful charismatic figure whose words fired the soul and challenged listeners to holiness. It was, I believe,to walk with one who had a deeply holy presence, one who was close to God and drew listeners into that closeness. Yet none of the disciples regarded him as God, and the Transfiguration indicated that God was other than Jesus,who was his Son, but the term Son of God simply denoted to Jews a holy person close to God. So far therefore, no divinity, but great holiness. But the stage was prepared.
Comments
I think that Jesus had the divine presence about him, and after the resurrection the jigsaw fell into place, and the disciples became aware of the significance of what he had been saying and doing.
The first paragraph to your first subheading, The Apostles' Experience, considers that "Jesus did not go round Judea claiming to be the Son of God, and when, sitting on the hillside above Caesarea Phillippi he asked the apostles who men said that he was, he received a variety of answers. He was a prophet reincarnated, possibly Isaiah or Jeremiah, even John the Baptist, but no one said that they or anyone else regarded Jesus as divine. When Simon Peter told Jesus that he thought him the Christ, the messiah, there were no divine meanings to that term, and it denoted one holy in God's sight sent to save Israel."
Some internet sources, I do not know how authoritative even though at least apparently credible, describe King David as considered the Messiah -- because he expressed sorrow over wrongdoing and willingness to make amends (albeit not possible with Uriah) -- by some unspecified segments of the Jewish population.
Would the Jewish groups with which Jesus Christ interacted have believed in King David's Messiahship?
The idea that the human mind is in babies a tabula rasa [blank slate ] is erroneous, for we have innate knowledge, and I believe that there is in babies an inchoate sense of self, though it is not yet conceptualized and shaped by language. Thus the human Jesus would have had some pre-conceptual sense of who he was, but he needed to formulate it in language, which he did through sharing in the cultural tradition of Israel and through interactions with others and in his case with his Father. So he would have slowly realized his true identity as Son of God, but we cannot discern the precise moment when this identity became clear.
I don't think that we should think of a pre-existing Jesus forgetting what he knew before his incarnation, for as you know as a physicist, thinking in terms of linear time sequences is an error when dealing with the profound mysteries of reality His time "before"the incarnation should not be seen in linear sequence with his early life. But this is going into metaphysical depths that require some explaining.
A theologian once told me that the rising from the dead was what gave credence to Jesus being God.
Alas, he could not answer another profound question that a friend kept asking, week after week. At what point did Jesus Himself know He is God? The best guess answer was it came gradually, for being true man as well as true God as a baby he would not have not likely known in His human condition. Of course His divine nature would, so we were told while He was also man, He did not leave the Godhead. Were my knowledge greater that would make a great article.