Cybersquatting is squatting in cyberspace. It is interesting subject in modern web oriented world, where more and more business is done through the internet and in some areas we can already say somebody without web site simply does not exist.
This kind of activity is also know under different, but related names, and is used as description of activity of domain(s) registration with the intention to prevent others to register their business at the same address. The idea is to resell the right for the use of name to somebody else with huge profit. While initial price is about ten dollars, it can raise up to hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Domain INSURANCE.COM, for instance was sold in 2010 for unbelievable 35,6 million dollars!
And we are talking about domain name only, without any right to content on the side...
Similar to scalping, this is of course illegal business in general, but, as we already said, with a lot of grey areas. We'll explore some common examples and try to learn from mistakes of others to have a better chance making our owns. As already stated, there is no simple black and white comparison, because many cases can be interpreted with different points of view and the results of legal procedures are pretty unpredictable. Yes, dealing with a cyber squatter or being one can be expensive too. So it is best to think twice before you act.
Have you ever been a victim of cybersquatter?
Typosquatting is done by purpose, spell checkers have nothing to do with that. The consequences or cybersquatting are by default done in real and cyber world.
Cyberspace-related catastrophes, conundrums and crises somewhat amaze me when I consider how many checks and tests preceded the computerized, cyber-space world.
The U.S. Department of Defense had computers decades before the business, the private-citizen, the private-sector and the public-sector world had them.
Is it possible that nobody anticipated cybersquatting problems or that nobody knew what to do with such a problem?
The first case, Typosquatting, somewhat mystifies me.
Spellcheckers seem so abundant; they even show up on Wizzley ;-D!
Would submitting sites to spellchecking be easy or onerous, expensive or reasonable?
The next-to-last paragraph about common lawsuits intrigues me.
What is the court through which one would plan such a lawsuit? Would the case be carried out totally in a physical location or would there be all or some virtual sequences?
Paper trail sounds simple solution until you start using it. But the main problem is not in finding the right person and finding who was the first registering. Rules about that subject are, in my opinion, out-dated and people just try to use the wholes in the system.
The paragraph What happened to my friend under the second subheading Have you heard about reverse domain hijacking? is unsettling.
Was your friend able to retrieve all his content?
Would it be possible for someone to hijack a site and hold the content in essence for ransom?
It's surprising how complicated rectifying cyberquatting can be!
Wouldn't it seem logical that the paper trail back to the first person registering the site name would prevail over the cyberquatter subsequently taking it? Or would cybersquatters have some way of altering information so that their dates look earlier?