I opened a Pinterest account more than a decade ago but was rather skeptical. It's based on images, and I am very strict about using images for whatever reason if the copyrights are not clear. In my opinion, they were not. Everybody pinned just anything, no matter what, and each pin is a file of its own, which makes it a duplicate. Still, I shared some Public Domain pictures to get the feel of working. Another problem with pinned images on Pinterest is links pointing to the web pages with pinned images. They are marked by a nofollow tag, which essentially should not bring any SEO benefit. Pinning content just to put it in front of potential visitors for a few seconds in their feeds didn't sound attractive to me. I focused on Google.
After several years of ups and downs with Google, I decided to give Pinterest another try. If nothing else, in the meantime, I noticed Pinterest is much more of a search engine than a social media service. I have also noticed pins of several images are placed in Google's search results pretty high. I offered help to some of my friends who have content with a lot of images. As you already know, Pinterest is all about visual results. My initial plan was to invest half an hour per day to create three original pins and evaluate results after one month. This was in July when my old account had less than one thousand visitors per month. Only a few of them actually clicked on the content promoted under the pins.
Here is what I have learned, and I am willing to share at the moment.
What are your experiences with Pinterest?
I personally know just a few occasional users of Pinterest and thy mostly use it for inspiration.
I wouldn't be so sure about the artists engaging in debate only. I have seen a few of them being very aggressive and not noble at all. But yes, Pinterest certainly lacks heated debates similar to Twitter. This is a big plus in my opinion.
I think so, yes. Or, at least for some people. On second thought, I know quite a few people who are 'window-shopping' by touching stuff. They are looking through their sense of touch which obviously makes them relaxed. Pinterest has the touchy part as well.
The computer crashed before I completed another component of my observation and question below.
Could the "pure mechanics" of "people who love window-shopping" come at least somewhat from those who are art-lovers and experimental artists and wannabe artists?
Artists engage themselves in debate but with an ever-artistic purpose, without gratuitousness, perhaps unlike those who "on other networks, on the other hand like to exchange opinions and many of them actually log in to argue with others."
Thank you for your comment below, in answer to my previous observation and question.
Your theory convinces me!
Images defer to window-shopping, much less difficult, methodical, stressful, even tedious than information-shopping, don't they?
It's just my theory ... I believe Pinterest was originally designed more as a social network, but then the pure mechanics changed the coarse ... People who are the most active on Pinterest are just like people who love windowshopping. They go around, click what they like and ignore the rest. They are not much about a debate. People on other networks, on the other hand like to exchange opinions and many of them actually log in to argue with others. You won't find that on Pinterest.
The last paragraph to your subheading, Pinterest is not much of a social network, advises us that "Yes, sure, Pinterest has options of liking, reppining, commenting, and saving other pins. You can follow other users, and they can follow you back. In reality, there is not much interaction with other users. If you want interaction, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter (X), Plurk, or Bluesky are much better options. If you follow somebody, it's not very likely they will follow you back, so don't bother with that. It's much better to focus on creating quality pins."
Is it known why Pinterest-ers cannot be counted upon to follow one another?
Examples of call to action are: 'visit the link below', 'read more', 'use this coupon for discount', 'save it for further use', etc., essentially anything which gives the Pinterest's bots a signal that the visitor found something useful and is willing to learn more. In consequence, your pin will be placed in better positions than the pins by users without interaction.
Hi, Veronica. I would be glad if you give me a follow. The power is in numbers. All the best!
All the images and information are generous in their explanations and suggestions.
In particular, the second subheading, Pinterest is a very good search engine, impresses me with its generous helpfulness, particularly with its observations that "If you want to place your pin high in the search results, you should follow next steps:
pin a quality image in vertical (!) orientation,
name it using a descriptive keyword,
describe it with another (related) keyword and try to include some kind of call-to-action in the description,
place a link where the place for the link is already waiting (the link should lead to the webpage with the pinned image),
use all possible tagged topics (ten topics may sound too much, but still try to use them all - just be creative)."
The third step intrigues me. What is either a general example or an example from your Pinterest account of "some kind of call-to-action in the description"?
Oh my word you have reminded me that I do actually have an account. Your article points out how useful th8s site is.
Ty. I need to make good use of it. .