As a college professor, now in my thirty-first year of teaching, I have seen students with a decreasing level of preparedness. Some are well prepared, but an increasing number are not. Some are, for all practical purposes, functioning illiterates, at least in some subject areas. Some have revealed where and why there is little background without realizing it, they think they are justifying their situation. The level of some students reaching college is alarming, and when we think these people expect to one day have a degree and impact society it is cause for dismay.
The examples I am presenting are by no means isolated cases.
Comments
Universities in the UK are expected to maintain high academic standards, but obviously they vary among themselves in their quality. At the bottom end there are some ex-polytechnics that have low standards in certain degrees, but there are very high quality institutions such as Oxford, Cambridge, Manchester, Liverpool, Nottingham,York and Durham, to name but a few. The government, which you might have inferred that I dislike intensely, did something right [for once] when it looked recently into universities to check whether they were giving away high grades too easily.
The problem with the polytechnics is that the Conservative government in 1992 allowed them to become universities. They did this for ideological reasons, as the left supported polytechnics, so the right opposed them! To do this the government allowed the polytechnic vice chancellors to inflate their own pay if they made the change to university status, and the vice chancellors, who run the institutions, were like pigs rushing to the trough. Some paid themselves more than the heads of Oxford and Cambridge, but not every institution made the transition well. Some made a good go of the change and offer good degrees, but others have poor reputations.
Thanks, Frank. I thought it might be better in the U. K. One thing I was hopeful of obtaining is feedback on conditions elsewhere.
I once had a student tell me she planned to teach the second grade, and to skip mathematics when she did. I had another ask me to print, she could not read cursive. But, the worse is when I came upon a friend sitting dejected after being told his students filed a complaint that he was using too large of words for a class in a university, and the department chair agreed with the students.
These students are the people we need to count on to solve problems, like global warming. That is the real frightening part of the situation.
Well said! You have fulfiled the first moral requirement for a writer, to speak the truth, unpopular though it may be.
I can add some cases from my own experience. Once when asked to take a maths class for an absent teacher, a twelve year old girl asked me for a calculator. I said that the calculators were in a locked cupboard to which I had no key, but she should work out the sum for herself. She said that 48 divided by four was too hard to do! I made her do the sum with me. Maybe she thought me hard, but I was doing her a favour.
Less excusable was a girl in a revision class that I was teaching. She was seventeen and was having trouble with her Religious Studies work. She was studying Mark's Gospel. Half way through the lesson I had an insight and asked her "Have you ever read this gospel?" The answer was no, she was working from notes and hand outs from the lecturer. I said that as we had three sessions booked, her homework for the first two nights was to actually read the book, the first half one night, the rest on the night after that. We got feed back from her. When she finally sat the exam she obtained the best result of all students in her class, two grades higher than any other of her classmates. So what standards was the teacher settting?