ChefKeem suggested that I bring this to the forums for second (third, fourth, fifth etc) opinions.
Today I've written a Wizzle introducing several First Aid scenarios. These are all incidents that have actually happened in my life, selected from nearly two decades of being a First Aider. On each occasions, I outline the situation, then stop at the point where I entered it. Each one begins with 'what would you do?' and ends with 'I dealt with it'.
The idea was that people either answer with, 'I'd have done x, y and z' or else realize that they wouldn't have known what to do, and are therefore inspired to get some First Aid training.
I didn't explain my actions, in order to prompt that thinking. Plus I thought that it would change the whole thrust of the article (what would YOU do). Adding my actions would make them into sweet, self-contained stories. People could read, find satisfaction, then walk away and forget about them.
I was also worried that it'd look like an article all about how Jo saved the day. Apart from the sheer arrogance of that, it also diminishes the part of the real heroes here - the emergency services.
However, Achim reckons that the article would work much, much better with my actions added in to complete each story. What do you think?
A friend of mine has offered another solution, which is to write a series of follow on articles, each taking a different aspect of First Aid and writing about that, e.g. fractures, heart attacks etc. Then linking up from the 'I dealt with it' lines.









, of course)

