1 pixel off, just one pixel... ONE! *Smiles*

This cracked me up, my thumbnail was off by 1 pixel....

Thought I'd share :)

Jerrico

*lol* Actually, it's better to use an image of at least 200px side length. Facebook does not require such, but it gives us a warning, that it would like to have preview images of this size.

I noticed today that the image (when I resized it to 92x92) showed up really small in the list... I've always used bigger images and made them equal proportions so when it was shrank it had all it's borders :)

I re-size all mine to 300 sq's or at least 300 one way

Think I'll go through my lot and check for image size lol

We just recently found out about Facebook's recommendation. Also with Wizzley's new layout, slightly bigger images (200+ px) look much better. So I think - as a convenience reminder - we'll simply increase the minimum image size to 200x200 ... usually images are a lot bigger anyway :)

By Facebook: "All the images referenced by og:image must be at least 200px in both dimensions. Please check all the images with tag og:image in the given url and ensure that it meets the minimum specification."

Yes, that would be great. 92 X 92 is too small.

I'm on board with that :)