If you've ever seen any photos from or participated in the Occupy movement, you've likely noticed a recurring costume theme among the participants, -the plastic mask of a creepy, pale-faced man with pointy facial hair and a smile that clearly says that he is up to no good.
The mask has become a representation of powerful, greedy, faceless corporations, bankers and politicians, but also serves as way to conceal the identity of activists who may be putting themselves at risk with their involvement and their actions against authority and tyranny.
The officially licensed Guy Fawkes mask is readily available to buy if you're willing to spend a minimal amount of cash. Of course, you'll be giving a few pennies to Time Warner in the process because they own the rights to the image from the film adaption of the mask that the main character wore in the V for Vendetta movie that was released in 2006.
My mother would never let us burn a guy on bonfire night, as she believed that it was inherently wrong to rejoice in an execution.
I think we are looking at a few issues here. The wearing of a mask, Guy Fawkes and anti -establishment. Which aren't necessarily all related.
The wearing of a mask only makes us anti-establishment if we proclaim it to be whilst doing so, indeed using it as a propaganda tool or to preserve anonymity. My two year old grandson could wear the same mask and have a good time playing, "scaring me his granny" and have no knowledge of the establishment. Thus wearing a mask can be anti-establishment but not necessarily. I wear masks as part of my work, wearing a mask to portray persona that I have no alliance to. The mask is inanimate and only takes on the significance of the wearer whoever that may be.
The Gun Powder Plot .... oh dear ... how many pages do we have?
Officially The Gunpowder Plot was a failed plot to blow up Parliament when King James came for the official opening after Summer in 1605. But was it a plot at all or an elaborate anti-Catholic propaganda coup with Guy Fawkes, an unwitting pawn ?
King James had become the Scottish king of England which was an anti-Catholic nation. But his mother had been Catholic and he had to prove to the government how anti Catholic he was. The barrels of gun powder were placed under the Parliament and just that very night when Catholic Guy Fawkes, a soldier-mercenary home and looking or work, was guarding the stash, that was the night the cellars were searched. Nowadays, we would "smell a rat or a set up". But at this time it was used as anti Catholic propaganda issue. Just as King James had wanted.
I think it is unfortunate that this poor man, Guy Fawkes, who was used as an easily dispensable pawn is the subject of an anti-establishment symbol and people although not so often now, burn his effigy every year when in actual fact, he was merely being paid to protect some gunpowder. I never wear a Guy Fawkes mask and never burnt a Guy on a bonfire,
I have never worn a Guy Fawkes mask, so I have no ax to grind here. But I am critical of the previous comment.
What's so obvious about the author's knowledge or lack of it? I think that she has some idea of the establishment, who doesn't, but whether she, you or I are fully aware of the extent of its tentacles I am unsure. We don't need perfect knowledge before we act and express, and we gain understanding as we progress in our endeavours.
My fear is that while I am no lover of the establishment, some who oppose it would set up an alternative establishment that would ultimately prove unjust
If you think wearing a Guy Fawkes mask in this day and age is anti-establishment you obviously have no clue as to the true nature of the establishment.
Great article! We've been selling these masks since 2011, shipping thousands of them around the world. We love to see the continued enthusiasm and perspective of what these masks mean to people on a personal level.
Great article! Enjoyed the history of Guy Fawkes and the videos were really interesting.