Fast forward to June 2050, which will be one hundred years after my birth in Cheshire.We cannot know the future with any certainty, we can only predict possibilities, but we can identify limiting factors, and the main limiting factor is the decline of fossil fuels, for only a finite quantity exists and it is being rapidly exhausted.
When the oil industry was at its zenith they used one barrel of oil to provide the energy to extract forty, but now in 2017 it is down to one barrel to extract eleven and only decline faces us. Gas faces the same problems. Once mighty coal is still present, but even this is in decline and despite Donald Trump's support for the US coal industry, far fewer people are now employed in it than there once were. The British coal industry is almost dead. Moreover,nuclear power,once feted as the path to a cheap future with energy too cheap to be worth billing, has proved disappointing as nuclear reactors' spent fuel is a burden to generations yet to come, and supplies of fissile materials are short. Fracking for shale gas offers some respite, but that too will become exhausted. Biofuels are a false path, as growing crops for fuel takes away land for food, which will be in great demand.
New technologies deriving energy from green sources are the only way. Wind power is now quite strong in my windy home island of Britain and can only become stronger. We can utilize the power of tidal flows, mighty fast at places in our home seas, and we can harness the power of waves. Given our natural resources of wind and water, I am confident that Britain can cope, but landlocked states have fewer advantages and must use the sun. We can do this in Britain, but not as well as some other brighter, warmer lands can.Cars will adapt to new technologies, for the petrol driven car is "dinosaur" technology. Hybrids using hydrogen and electricity will be the future and are coming in now.
But what of sea and airflight. Even modern planes are fuel expensive and availation fuel is running out. Will we see the return of the airship? It is slower than a plane but unless it uses hydrogen it is much safer, as it cannot explode into flames. Sailing ships may make a return, letting the wind propel the ship as before. But modern rigging systems and new designs of sail, all computerised, will make sailing a modern technological process. They will have auxiliary engines based on renewable battery power from wind and sun.
But military powers need fuel, but as fuel becomes more costly large military forces involving tanks and armoured vehicles will become prohibitively expensive. This will make invasions less economically viable. I don't think that it will stop war, but make it harder to do and total war will become pointless.





Comments
frankbeswickAug 16, 2024
DerdriuMarrinerAug 15, 2024
Yes, Heaven appears like a more immediate interest all that time from now, when collateral- and direct-line descendants brave planetary, solar-system and universe changes.
Is the Christian tradition that those who inhabit Heaven interest themselves in those after-lifers in Heaven alone or those in Heaven and not in Heaven or is non-Heaven the interest only of God and the Holy Spirit and Jesus Christ and the saints?
frankbeswickAug 15, 2024
DerdriuMarrinerAug 14, 2024
Amen about such solar-system evolutions and such technology so far in the future and therefore beyond our lifespans!
But will we see it all from the after-life in the next world?
frankbeswickAug 14, 2024
DerdriuMarrinerAug 13, 2024
So our sun can replenish whatever light energy circulates Earthward. That's reassuring!
Brian May of astrophysics and Queen fame describes the solar system as our sun gets older and older. External and internal changes impel our Earth over time more and more away from our sun. He identifies as one solution if technology modifies our Earth into its own spaceship.
Our Earth traveling through space as its own transportation mode would be quite an adventure, wouldn't it? (In such a case, we would be alive to mourn our sun's passing!)
frankbeswickAug 13, 2024
DerdriuMarrinerAug 12, 2024
Your description of the sun as a "giant fusion reactor" caused me to consider its light circulating through the solar system.
The water cycle is affected by impediments to its traveling through its different phases in the air, in plants and in the water.
Might that "giant fusion reactor" be dimmed or unaffected by massive reliance on solar energy?
frankbeswickMar 9, 2020
You are right, robots don't compete with living things, and the industrial society that produces robotics may not be for ever.
In thirty years time we may have lost some species and breeds, but failing ecological disaster most animals will still be with us.
DerdriuMarrinerMar 9, 2020
Do you see nuclear fusion in the 2050 power picture? Popular Mechanics fit the article Patents Secured for Revolutionary Nuclear Fusion Technology by Caroline Delbert in its 24 February 2020 offerings.
American toads and spring peepers (Pseudacris crucifer) have been forming nightly choruses in the vernal pool behind me since shortly after area woodchucks saw their shadows. Nothing robotic is competitive with them or the bluebirds in the Chinese chestnut and the mimosa. How would you see cultivated and wild animals faring 30 years hence?
frankbeswickNov 25, 2017
blackspanielgalleryNov 25, 2017
One thing that you did not mention is the erosion of social skills by a generation obsessed with ipads and other similar devices to the point of lacking human interaction. That is a whole other issue the world faces.