The problems facing work are robotization and the quick redundancy of skills. Once you learned a skill that lasted you for life, but now a few years after learning it you need to retrain. Robots are taking jobs. Where will all this lead?
Big business will press further with robotization, but there is a self-limiting element to this process, for as people are rendered jobless by robotization, they will be less able to purchase the goods that business makes, causing declining profit ,and so the businesses may not be as able to automate as they would like. The market for personal robots, like robot butlers, will stall.
But deprived of work the people will not be content with bread and circuses, as was the population of ancient Rome, they will turn their hands to crafts. Just think of what has happened in Detroit, as jobless workers take land and cultivate it. Not everyone can cultivate, but there are a range of other skills that can be exercised. A counter-economy of small traders will arise, parallelling the large industrial economy and in competition with it. Of course, big business will try to use lobbying and political influence to undermine the counter-economy, but we must be ready for this and resist their attempts firmly.
Agriculture is a case in point. Large farms are oil users, in their tractors and in the fertilizer that they use, which is oil based. As oil fails, a farming model will collapse. Some big farms will survive, but they will do so against the tide wich is to go for small scale, intensive production, not at the expense of the earth, but in harmony with it. The extractive economy, which takes from the Earth and gives nothing in return will be failing, though those who benefit from it will desperately cling on. Permaculture and organic production will become the norm, by default, as the farming model which opposes them collapses.
Pressure on food supplies will see movements to green the cities, so we will see the growth of community gardens, green walls and green roofs. Schools will have their own gardens, and food production will become a high status job, I hope.
Comments
Christians vary in their thoughts about what people do in heaven. We really know little about it.
Thank you for your comment below in answer to my previous observation and question.
Yes, Heaven appears like a more immediate interest all that time from now, when collateral- and direct-line descendants brave planetary, solar-system and universe changes.
Is the Christian tradition that those who inhabit Heaven interest themselves in those after-lifers in Heaven alone or those in Heaven and not in Heaven or is non-Heaven the interest only of God and the Holy Spirit and Jesus Christ and the saints?
Probably, but we might not be interested. Heaven might be more interesting
Thank you for your comment below in answer to my previous observation and question.
Amen about such solar-system evolutions and such technology so far in the future and therefore beyond our lifespans!
But will we see it all from the after-life in the next world?
If it ever happens we will not be alive to see it.
Thank you for your comment below in answer to my previous observation and question.
So our sun can replenish whatever light energy circulates Earthward. That's reassuring!
Brian May of astrophysics and Queen fame describes the solar system as our sun gets older and older. External and internal changes impel our Earth over time more and more away from our sun. He identifies as one solution if technology modifies our Earth into its own spaceship.
Our Earth traveling through space as its own transportation mode would be quite an adventure, wouldn't it? (In such a case, we would be alive to mourn our sun's passing!)
No. The sun will follow its own path till it dies, but no one alive today will be alive then.
Thank you for your comment below in answer to my previous observation and question.
Your description of the sun as a "giant fusion reactor" caused me to consider its light circulating through the solar system.
The water cycle is affected by impediments to its traveling through its different phases in the air, in plants and in the water.
Might that "giant fusion reactor" be dimmed or unaffected by massive reliance on solar energy?
We have a giant fusion reactor called the sun, Derdriu. It is a free and long-lasting source of power that does not require expensive technology. So I do not think that fusion reactors can or will compete with solar power.Nuclear power has been a false promise. We were once promised nuclear energy too cheap to meter: it did not happen, and I suspect that fusion will suffer the same fate.
You are right, robots don't compete with living things, and the industrial society that produces robotics may not be for ever.
In thirty years time we may have lost some species and breeds, but failing ecological disaster most animals will still be with us.
frankbeswick, Thank you for the philosophy, practicalities and products.
Do you see nuclear fusion in the 2050 power picture? Popular Mechanics fit the article Patents Secured for Revolutionary Nuclear Fusion Technology by Caroline Delbert in its 24 February 2020 offerings.
American toads and spring peepers (Pseudacris crucifer) have been forming nightly choruses in the vernal pool behind me since shortly after area woodchucks saw their shadows. Nothing robotic is competitive with them or the bluebirds in the Chinese chestnut and the mimosa. How would you see cultivated and wild animals faring 30 years hence?