Mary Magdalene was an important figure in early community, but we know little about her. A long-enduring error in the church is to confuse four separate women: Mary Magdalene, Mary of Bethany, the sister of Martha [herself one of the early community,]【 but like her sister, not a travelling one] was one such woman, and the other two included the woman taken in adultery and the sinful woman of Luke's Gospel. The latter two women have minor roles and then fade out of the story.. Joanna, the wife of Herod's steward, possibly a widow was among the women who visited Jesus' tomb, as was Mary wife of Cleopas. We know from the writings of Eusebius, a historian who recorded some historical information about Jesus' family, that St Joseph had a brother called Cleophas. This makes his wife Jesus' aunt. Cleophas turns up in the final chapter of Luke's Gospel, when he is named as one of the two travelers who encounter Jesus on the road to Emmaus. along with his son, probably Simeon, later to become bishop of Jerusalem
Not a lot is recorded of these women. The woman who anointed Jesus with a jar of Nard, an expensive perfume, ,is likely to have been Mary of Bethany,who seems to come from a family with plenty of money, as they seem to have been from a family who had property. Some Christian thinkers are of the opinion that Martha and Mary of Bethany, along with their brother Lazarus . were the children of Joseph of Arimathea, who was a scholarly member of the Sanhedrin, council, who in John 3 came to visit Jesus secretly at night to inquire about his identity and mission. But this claim is neither verified nor at this stage of scholarship verifiable. It might be correct, but we do not know.
Mary Magdalen is a mystery. She was not a woman of ill-repute, as I have said. Nor did she come from the town of Magdala, which only acquired the name some years after the death and resurrection of Jesus. Gnostic sources makea great deal of the relationship between Jesus and Mary Magdalen. Some Gnostics claimed that .jesus had married Mary but thereis no Gospel support for this belief. Certainly, Jesus included her among the women whom he taught. Mary seems to have been an emotional person who was very attached to Jesus. On resurrection day she was one of the women who visited the tomb to anointed and mourn Jesus, and this made her the first witness to the resurrection and the apostle to the apostles.
Comments
There is do documentary backing for this view, and I cannot think of any evidence for this claim
Thank you for your comment below in answer to my previous observation and question.
Did some people at the time of Jesus Christ disdain Galilee dwellers even as they perhaps did not disdain Magdala dwellers?
You may be right about her dwelling temporarily in M.agdala. I know of none who have suggested this previously
Thank you for your comment below in answer to my previous observation and question.
Did Mary Magdalene perhaps dwell in Magdala during her deeds with Jesus Christ?
She is known as Mary of Magdala, and as we do not know whence she came there is no need to use the term Magdala in her naming. Her geographical origins do not matter, but like most of the other disciples she probably came from Galilee
Thank you for your comment below in answer to my previous observation and question.
It's interesting that there's that indication of Mary Magdalene as not from Magdala.
Why then might it matter to mention her as from there?
Might that mean a misinformation -- for whatever motive -- or a mistake?
We do not know. As Jesus' immediate band of followers were from Galilee it is likely that she was Galilean, but in those days records of women were not well kept.
The second section, Others in the group, advises us that "Mary Magdalen is a mystery. She was not a woman of ill-repute, as I have said. Nor did she come from the town of Magdala, which only acquired the name some years after the death and resurrection of Jesus."
Where did Mary come from if not from Magdala?
I DO NOT THINK SO' as jesus power is derived from God
Thank you for your comment below in answer to my previous observation and question.
Did all the mistreatment afore the crucifixion and the crucifixion itself do anything to Jesus Christ's power?