Search engine optimization (SEO) is not a rocket science, but due its complexity offers numerous ways for making fatal mistakes. Here is my personal experience.
1. Wrong domain name.
I named my site the same my company is named, what is logical and it is even suggested because the name is brandable. Unfortunately it doesn’t make any sense to search engines. So if I would start all over again, I would take name with right keywords (something people actually look for).
The name itself is irrelevant now, but as a curiosity I can add my main idea was to build a portal with tips from fashion, culinary and similar lifestyle related articles.
To make it more attractive, I added a widget, which randomly displayed inspirational quotes. One of them was a proverb where raising a kid is compared with breaking stones.
None of my articles ranked for any of chosen topics, but for some reason my site earned a number one spot for stone cutting!
2. Bad site design.
Site looked great, but search engines didn’t like it. It had large photos and slide shows what caused slowness. It had some nice additions (jokes, weather widget and similar stuff) and all that made site even slower. Search engines were pretty confused by all the fancy stuff and they couldn’t figure what is site really about for more than half a year.
It took me several months to find acceptable compromise - I arranged articles in few logical topics and search engines slowly started to realize what I wanted to display and what kind of visitors would be interested in my content.
3. No keyword research.
I published articles only based on my opinion what is interesting and never checked if anybody ever looks for the information I provided. So after first half year I had about 50 articles and between 10 and 20 visitors a day who came to the site purely by coincidence. Statistics showed most of them stayed on the site less than a minute.
Then I started to use Keyword Planner and found the cold truth - some of my articles competed with too authoritative articles on other sites, some were about non popular topics and some were just not written clear enough to be understood by search engines.
My main lesson from first steps in the world of keyword research was simple. If I want to write about potato, word potato should be used in the title of the article and also few times in the article itself. Web content is not the right place for wordplay and web spiders have no sense of humor.
4. Too long articles.
It seems on web nobody really reads. Folk only skim the text in search for particular information. They like to check some nice photos too, but names of my photos were not related to proper keywords. Most of them had only numbers and name related to photo service, where they come from, what made to another confusion.
Search engine bots started to relate my site to photo services.
In recent years longer articles became more popular then before. There are several reasons for that:
- Spammers prefer short articles, because their main goal is making fast and easy cash. Satisfaction of their visitors is not on the list of their intentions.
- Longer articles became more popular among search engine bots. They offer more so called long tail keywords from which more than 70 percent of web searches consist.
- They also have better semantic structure and are easier to relate to the topic, what gives them better chance to be offered to right kind of audience.
- Longer articles in general incorporate more multimedia material, which constantly gain popularity among web users.
But proper names of photos and other elements in each article are still a must!
5. No linking strategy.
I sure did submission of the URL of my site to some web directories, but only later I found out most of them are useless, so have I spent hours and hours just to write some info which nobody will ever read. Then I opened couple of blogs, posted some so called supporting articles just to find out I have to support blogs too!
I tried to read as much information about getting traffic as I could, but among all the noise in the internet only one thing was for sure: I need backlinks pointing to my site.
The web today is comprised of trillions of links: links between websites, links within social media venues like Facebook and Twitter, and even links in email inboxes. Who links ...
Advertisement
But these links were useless if there were no other backlinks pointing to the articles with links.
Building links required a lot of time and energy and results were not nearly as good as I hoped.
After a while I became more efficient and my site got some traffic. It was a slow start, yet much better than nothing.
These two blogs are probably best resources for web site owners:
These blogs were my best resources of knowledge. They are both written in Slovenian language.
https://pisanjeclankov.blogspot.com/
6. Wrong internal linking.
Or may I say: no internal linking? I was too lazy to check if somebody looks for information I offer, so how could I expect search engines would ever found out connections between my articles? I organized them by general themes and that was that! With some proper text linking I could do wonders!
Well, not wonders, but traffic slowly started to build up.
From several (random) visitors per day I started to get about one hundred visitors per day and according to statistics most of them got what they were looking for. Visitors who looked for stone cutters were replaced by visitors who wee looking for articles about fashion, culinary and education - exactly themes I offered.
Internal linking greatly improved positions of my pages in the web rankings and best of all I have all the controls over this kind of links. I have also tried to use some plug-ins for linking related articles, but manual settings proved to much better.
7. I wasn’t patient.
I tried to learn and implement all what I picked about SEO at the moment I found out and didn’t take time to check if my information was accurate and up to date. So I have lost compass in changing URL addresses on the site, linking from outside, meta descriptions and finally the main database fell apart ...
After about one year of trial and error I slowly learned what worked for me and what not. I learned about Penguin and Panda and other updates and what is probably most important of all, I learned to pick right fights. This means I stopped writing articles according to my current mood and implied proper keyword research. My knowledge about keywords is still far from perfection but it gets better day after day.
And here I am - with more than a dozen working sites, thousands of visitors and priceless experience in the field of search engine optimization.
What are your SEO sins?
Jo_MurphyDec 5, 2023
mihgasperDec 5, 2023
Jo_MurphyDec 5, 2023
mihgasperJun 19, 2023
DerdriuMarrinerJun 17, 2023
What -- and I ask this just to understand keyword-picking, not to launch such a site, since my natural and social sciences-related site may include food and recipes but not in any way culinary- or lifestyle-inspiring or linked -- would be an example of a "right" keyword that people would look for and find such a portal?
DerdriuMarrinerDec 21, 2022
Would that be what your practice tends to be with keywords?
CakeNov 3, 2016
KebeNov 2, 2016
mihgasperJan 12, 2016
happynutritionistJan 8, 2016
mihgasperJan 7, 2016
sandyspiderJan 7, 2016
mihgasperDec 16, 2015
ologsinquitoDec 15, 2015