The Legacy of Rome in Britain

by frankbeswick

The Romans stayed in Britain from 43 AD to 407, but the impact of their presence is still with us.

The Romans occupied parts of Britain, some parts for three hundred years, others for less, others not at all. It was a political and military conquest which has left its traces in the physical landscape, which still possesses remnants of military installations, but also it has left its trace in places across England mainly. But the physical traces are only part of the story, for the political structure of the British Isles still is influenced by the presence or absence of Rome.

Photo of Hadrian's Wall, courtesy of Markusspiske, of Pixabay

What's In a Name

I can think of no better place to start than my own name. Beswick is Anglo-Saxon, but -wick is a loan word from Latin, very common in England.  Roman forts often had a vicus [pronounced wicus] near them. This was an economic area. When the Romans left the word wicus remained and came to denote an area used for economic purposes, often for sheep or dairy. That wick is a very common place name ending is a sign of the impact of the Roman presence. However,  people with wick  in their surname are not more likely to be of Roman descent than anyone else in the population.  

Furthermore, I live in the district of Stretford, in Greater Manchester, near to Chester Road, and there is Roman influence in these place names.  Roman roads were sometimes known as streets. Stretford means Street Ford, where a street, in Latin strada, fords the river Mersey. The street in question is the old Roman road, which runs underneath the long, straight road to Chester. Watling Street is the name of  long Roman road which extended  from Dover for 276 miles to Wroxeter in the West Midlands

Chester is an English place name ending derived from the Latin castra, military camp. It always denotes a site once occupied by a Roman military unit. Chester, thirty miles from where I live was known as the city of the legions, as it was a legionary base for several hundred years,    home of the twentieth legion. Manchester was a mere fort, but its remains have been excavated and can be visited. Variants of the word chester are cester or caster. Examples are Cirencester in Sussex and Lancaster in Lancashire. Furthermore, in South Wales we have the city of Caerleon [ pronounced Carleon. ] This name is composed of the Welsh caer, meaning castle and leon, a word that is a shortened form of legion. City of the Legion, it was the base of the Second Legion. There are Roman remains there, as you will  see  in the next section. Eboracum is York, home of the sixth legion, and the city is rich in Roman archaeology.

Other place names signify Roman influence. London is a Celtic word, but the Roman name Londinium survived the departure of the Romans, and this is indicative of cultural and ethnic continuity between the Roman period and the subsequent Saxon age. Faversham, in Kent, has a  name that includes the Saxon ham [home] with the Latin faber, meaning maker, and is indicative of the survival of a group of smiths from the Roman period into the Saxon age. Nearby, the town of Dover has a name little changed from the Latin Dubris [v and b  are phonetically closely related.]



Roman remains are found in Britain. Two cities still have walls around their historic centres, these being Chester and York. The walls have been repaired over many centuries and while York walls have hardly any of the Roman wall left, Chester still retains a noticeable element of the Roman walls along with its mediaeval elements.

Hadrian's Wall spans the narrow seventy mile border between the Roman province of Britain and the unconquered land of Caledonia, and while modern England extends beyond the wall in the North East, the border between England and Scotland still follows its path for part of its distance. The wall has lost some of its height as stones have fallen off at places, but to compensate archaeologists have uncovered the remains of Roman forts along much of its length.  But not many people know that there was a wall further north running across the narrow line between southern and highland Scotland, this was a turf wall known as the Antonine Wall, but very little of this remains.  it dates from a short-lived Roman presence in Southern Scotland.

A series of ruined forts runs along the South East coast of Britain from the coast of East Anglia down to Kent. This was known as the Saxon Shore and it was governed by an official known  as the Count of the Saxon Shore, [Comites Litoris Saxonorum] whose job was to defend Roman Britain  from Saxon and Frankish raiders. Inland security during this period in the third and fourth centuries was the responsibility of the Dux Britanniae [Duke of Britain.] Dux means leader Some of these forts still have substantial stretches of masonry still standing.

Caerleon in South Wales still has large stretches of Roman remains, including the remnants of an amphitheatre and the foundations of a Roman legionary barracks.  There is also the excavated remains of a Roman bath house used by the Roman legionaries. it was capable of holding 80, 000 gallons of water. 

There are plenty of smaller Roman forts and stretches of Roman road in Britain, along with the excavated remains of Roman villas, inhabited by Romans or powerful Britons. These are mainly in the south and east, for North West England north of Chester was never a zone where Romans settled comfortably. It was always a military occupation. Sometimes the villas reveal mosaic floors, like the magnificent mosaic  floor of Fishbourne, home to probably a client king friendly with Rome. it is now the centrepiece of a Roman museum on the site. Also still in use are the waters of the hot spring at Bath, but the building is much later and the site  was used by the Britons long before Rome arrived.

A short stretch of Roman road is still used as a footpath in the hills of North Wales leading from the Conwy Valley to Aber. Walking the road was a thought-provoking experience, as it made me conscious of my place in the relentless flow of time. Don't, however, be fooled by the "Roman Steps" at Bala in North Wales, for they are a mediaeval pack horse trail.

A Broad View

The  history of the British Isles is a tale of conflict between the four constituent nations and also within them, as kings and nobles strove for dominance. But one fault line that runs throughout the story is the tension between Saxon and "Celt." I say Celt  advisedly, as the native Britons never called themselves Celts, the word was first applied to them in the nineteenth century. But it referred to a real division between Britons and Germanic and South Scandinavian incomers. The incoming Angles, Saxons and Jutes were not a replacement of Rome, as the Romans had been using German troops for two hundred years or more, and after Rome left the native kings of the newly independent British kingdoms continued to import Germans to support them in their fights with the marauding Picts from Highland Scotland and also with each other. The Anglo-Saxons originally settled in the south  and east of the country, but spread north and west to form the political entity that became England. They were aided in this by the strife among northern Welsh kingdoms which culminated at the fratricidal battle of Arderydd, pronounced arderith, and by the military   superiority of the English. But it remains to be  said that the presence of Saxons in the British Isles is part of the legacy of Rome.

Without the Roman importation of Saxons to Britain the English language as we know it would not exist. The language that would have been spoken in England cannot be known, but it would probably have been closer to modern Welsh, which is a Celtic tongue with a significant inclusion of vocabulary derived from Latin. There have been many influences on English over the course of its history,  but its existence owes something to Rome.

 The political structure of Britain owes much to the situation that existed when the Romans departed. When Rome left the old Roman province of Britain covered all of modern England and Wales. The legions had been withdrawn for some time, leaving garrisons of foederrati [non-legionary troops from allied peoples] to guard the province. A large group of Angles from North Germany were present in Yorkshire, along with other German troops. Other garrisons manned the forts on Hadrian's wall, forming a barrier between the areas which came to be known as England and Scotland, which each developed their own distinct, though interlocking histories. Interestingly, England and Wales did not retain a politically significant clan structure [ though there were some English clans on the Scottish borders, known as the Highlanders]  

England was the area of  Anglo-Saxon political dominance; Wales was the area of the Roman province in which there was insignificant Saxon presence; Scotland was the area in which Roman power never got a long term foothold. The Romans never conquered any of Ireland. Rome left over sixteen hundred years ago, but its footprint remains.


I am an Amazon associate and earn money from qualifying purchases on this page.


paid link

View on Amazon

Updated: 11/20/2021, frankbeswick
Thank you! Would you like to post a comment now?


Only logged-in users are allowed to comment. Login
frankbeswick on 01/24/2024

The name Beck was used in England before the Norse arrived, so it cannot be the origins of the name. Similarly the Anglo saxons had hot developed many occupational surnames by the seventh century. So I prefer old German has the originating language of the name.

DerdriuMarriner on 01/23/2024

Thank you!

English Wiktionary suggests as Beck etymology German origins in Beck ("brook, stream"); Old West Norse origins in bekkr ("bench"); and spelling variant of Becker ("baker").

Which meaning -- ;-D -- sounds most accurate and agreeable to you?

frankbeswick on 01/21/2024

Beac is akin to the German name Beck, at least that seems to be the best derivation.

DerdriuMarriner on 01/20/2024

Thank you!

English Wiktionary breaks the surname Beswick down as from
-- the Old English personal name Beac;
-- the Old English genitive masculine or neuter possessive singular 's ("of");
-- the Old English wīċ ("bay, camp, encampment, lodging, temporary abode, village").

It gives nothing definition-, etymology- or origin-wise regarding the name Beac.

Might the meaning be lost to posterity or might it have extant actual, possible or probable meanings?

frankbeswick on 01/20/2024

I don't think that there wascan original Latin.Wick was already established in English by the time that Beswick was established, which was probablynin the seventh century. The name Beck fell out of use in the seventh century, so the name cannot be younger than that period.

DerdriuMarriner on 01/19/2024

The second sentence to the first subheading, What's in a name?, considers that "Beswick is Anglo-Saxon, but -wick is a loan word from Latin, very common in England."

What might the original Latin be?

frankbeswick on 07/24/2022

Roman tactics were based on their being a disciplined force fighting an Ill-controlled war band in pitched battle.But from the time of the Gaul Vercingetorix it was known that the Romans were susceptible to guerilla tactics, a deficiency that produced the rout of
Rome at the Teutobergian Forest.The Silures used this weakness to some effect in Wales,but the Picts drove home this advantage in the Caledonian woodland.

Veronica on 07/23/2022

The Romans being disciplined and efficient, they were ill-suited for the wild ways of the Picts and Scoti which lacked organised tactics.

frankbeswick on 07/21/2022

Southern England is not very hilly and is ideal fighting territory for legions, which were designed for relatively flat lands. But as the Romans went northwards they encountered rockier, boggier and more mountainous terrain, in which the fighting capacity of legions was challenged. Moreover, the forested terrain of Scotland [Caledonia, the woodland] suited the use of guerilla warfare with hit and run attacks rather than the use of legions designed for pitched battle. Furthermore, the economic value of land in Scotland is not high and would not repay conquest.

It is likely that the Romans intended to conquer Ireland, but with all their problems in Britain they were already overstretched.

Veronica on 07/20/2022

The Romans spread themselves too thinly. They did not have the resorces, human or physical, to cover all that land.

Scotland was difficult to capture because of the utter savagery of the Picts and Scoti . The terrain and weather also played their part.
The Scoti were unruly, undisciplined, fierce fighters.

You might also like

Between Christian and Pagan: a review

This book is a detailed and learned account of Christian-pagan relations in t...

Alexander the Great: God-King or Mere Mortal?

Alexander the Great was not a prophet. But he does hold a place in history a...

Ancient Rome: History and Heritage

Ancient Rome was a republic and then an empire that existed for almost a thou...

Disclosure: This page generates income for authors based on affiliate relationships with our partners, including Amazon, Google and others.
Loading ...