The Melsonby Hoard

by frankbeswick

A lucky find on a piece of grassland made for a find of ancient artefacts, which has put an English village on the map.

Archaeologists and detectorists need luck. Many pass their lives seeking the one find that will bring fame, but at Melsonbury, a quiet English village, luck eventually came true, not gold or silver, far from it, but a trove of historically valuable artefacts, Lady Luck had struck. More precious than gold, they provide knowledge, the precise location of the site is secret, to protect it from ravagers These artefacts will enjoy a proud place in a museum in the ancient city of York.Photos courtesy of GingerMari'e12, courtesy of Pixabay

The Yorkshire Iron Age

Yorkshire, the Northern English name for much of the area east of the Pennine Hills, is England's largest county, so large that in the nineteenth century it was split into three. However, the inhabitants still call themselves Yorkshire folk. It is a land of great swathes of countryside, much industrial heritage, and a great deal of history, not all of it peaceful, as it fought a long conflict with my native Lancashire during the Wars of the Roses in the fifteenth century. The land is well-known for its archaeology, as it  has a long history of inhabitation reaching back to the stone ages. But archaeology is a matter of chance discoveries. People walk over ground little knowing that an archaeological find is a foot or so beneath their feet. This was so at the peaceful village of Melsonby, in North Yorkshire. The find  was not in the village itself, but in some open land nearby. It appears that the piece of land had for a long time been grass, pasture for animals. It does not seem to have been ploughed for many years, if ever. Then in 2021 a detectorist got permission from the landowner [necessary, by law]  and began to search. The detectorist had never found anything significant, but he had found something of archaeological significance. He did his legal duty by reporting the find to the landowner and then to the police  The archaeological department at a nearby university was allocated the job of excavation. The exploration had begun.

It may be significant that Melsonby is near Stanwyk, the large earthwork where the Queen of the Brigantes, Cartimandua, had her base. Cartimandua was not only a queen, but a goddess to her people. The Brigantes were a large tribe who derived their name from Brige, a Celtic goddess, who was embodied in the tribal queen.. They were a large confederation of smaller tribes, but they were almost certainly a matrilineal society. Such societies were known in Britain for a long time. The Picts of Scotland reckoned inheritance of the  throne through the female line. Yet in some matrilineal societies, the queen could dispense with the king and choose a more suitable lover. It is very likely that in these matrilineal societies the king so dispensed with would be ritually slain, a fate that might have befallen the bog bodies found over North West Europe. The thinking behind this is that the king must be vigorous for the tribe to be healthy and the corn to grow. We do not know whether ritual sacrifice was on the cards for Cartimandua's husband, or whether or not ritual sacrifice was still practised, but Julius Caesar, writing in the first century BC, speaks of its being done among the druids But we are told that Cartimandua's husband Venutius had taken umbrage against her statement that she was going to divorce him and marry her much younger armour  bearer. If this rejection involved a ritual sacrifice we can imagine his not being enamoured by the prospect. He rebelled, and she, who was an ally of Rome, appealed for Roman help. Rome sent a light force of auxiliaries to rescue Cartimandua and she fades out of history. But Venutius held the throne and there was  ongoing Brigantian resistance to Rome well into the next century.

We are dealing with what is probably a funeral site. But there is no evidence of violence at the site. The connection with Cartimandua is by association, but we cannot go further on  this matter. As Cartimandua was around in the year 70 AD. She is probably a bit late for this burial, which is probably from the first century BC.

Treasure Trove

A team of archaeologists got on the job and worked over two years to excavate the site, and only now in early 2025 has the site's existence been public knowledge.  There was no treasure so the law of treasure trove did not apply.. Treasure trove is a legal status which is applied to gold and silver items discovered. Gold and silver items  discovered are presumed to be the property of the one who buried them. If no owner can be proven they are the property of the crown. This does not mean that they are the personal property of the king b but they belong to the state.  The discovery of gold and silver items must be reported promptly to the police. Neglect of this duty can be a crime. If treasure trove is proven  the finder and the landowner share the market value, but failure to report promptly can be detrimental to entitlement to this share.

The Items.

Chariot burials are known in Yorkshire, but the remains found in the Melsonby site seem to be four wheeled wagons, more suitable for trade than war. What is significant is that the vehicles seem to have been ceremonially burnt in a pyre before inhumation. This implies that we are dealing with the cremation of a wealthy person. He or she, we have no means of identifying whether it was male or female, could afford to have interred twenty eight iron tyred wheels. The site contains remnants of horse harnesses of high quality adorned with glass ornaments. This was a very wealthy person , and considering that we are dealing with a body from a matrilineal society it is not beyond possibility that this is a queen's grave,

The sum total of artefacts exceeds eight hundred items of iron and copper, including llnch pins for horses. Many, however, are fragmentary. A few weapons are present,these being two ceremonial spears. This is not the grave of a great warrior.  We know of female chariot burials from the region of  Yorkshire. Significantly,  there are two vessels, one a drinking bowl which was probably for wine.   But we must realize that medications were..administered with wine, so it is possible that the grave contains a healer. The other vessel is suggestive of a healer or an an enchantress. This is a cauldron, I do not regard this as a male tool. So this, I,suggest, is a female who was deemed to have healing or, spell binding powers. The cauldron came with a chain for hanging the vessel over a fire. This is in keeping with its being a culinary tool, and likely to belong to a woman. The glass and coral beads probably are the product of trade with continental Europe, most likely the Mediterranean regionindicating that Brigante society was an advanced tradIng society.

But who was she? She might have been one of Cartimandua's predecessors as queen or at least a very high ranking female. She may have been a healer.  As the earthly embodiment of Brige, a kindly goddess whose special field of work was the family, the home and child birth she was unlikely to be a goddess/queen with a warlike character

Updated: 03/27/2025, frankbeswick
 
Thank you! Would you like to post a comment now?
10

Comments

Only logged-in users are allowed to comment. Login
frankbeswick 1 day ago

There is not a negotiation between the finder's claim and the state. The state's representative makes a decision on the value. If there is any disagreement then a court could deal with the case, but I know of no case where any disagreement has occurred.

DerdriuMarriner 1 day ago

The fourth, Treasure trove paragraph to the first subheading, The Yorkshire Iron Age, advises us that "There was no treasure so the law of treasure trove did not apply.. Treasure trove is a legal status which is applied to gold and silver items discovered. Gold and silver items discovered are presumed to be the property of the one who buried them. If no owner can be proven they are the property of the crown. This does not mean that they are the personal property of the king b but they belong to the state. The discovery of gold and silver items must be reported promptly to the police. Neglect of this duty can be a crime. If treasure trove is proven the finder and the landowner share the market value, but failure to report promptly can be detrimental to entitlement to this share."

Does the market-value payment to the finder and the landowner divorce them from all dealings with gold- and silver-coin discoveries?

frankbeswick 2 days ago

Coroners are called only if there is a body, even if it 8s only a skeleton. The police have the responsibility of invoking the coroner.

DerdriuMarriner 2 days ago

Thank you for your comments below in answer to my previous observation and question.

So the detectorist contacts the landowner and the police. Your answer then elucidates that "There is a public official who needs to be informed by the police."

That answer also fits a coroner into the equation if the detectorist finds a body.

Who must call the coroner: the detectorist, the landowner, the police or someone else?

frankbeswick 2 days ago

Museums are entitled to have first call on items discovered.

frankbeswick 2 days ago

There has been a recent change in the law. To be counted as treasure an object must be two hundred years old and made partly of any metal, and it must be of some historical importance, this applies to the vast majority of ancient objects found, including ancient coins.

frankbeswick 3 days ago

The detectorist is only oblig3r to tell p9lice and landowner

frankbeswick 3 days ago

The law requires that the police should be called. There is a public official who needs to be informed by the police. The coroner wl have to be informed if there is a body

DerdriuMarriner 3 days ago

The ending sentences to the first paragraph under the first subheading, The Yorkshire iron age, advises us that "Then in 2021 a detectorist got permission from the landowner [necessary, by law] and began to search. The detectorist had never found anything significant, but he had found something of archaeological significance. He did his legal duty by reporting the find to the landowner and then to the police."

Is the detectorist only impelled to interact with the landowner or is that interaction afore, or concomitant with, the appropriate governmental authority?

You might also like

The Legacy of Rome in Britain

The Romans stayed in Britain from 43 AD to 407, but the impact of their prese...

Blick Mead: Stonehenge's sacred spring

Archaeological discoveries near Stonehenge throw light upon the origins of th...


Disclosure: This page generates income for authors based on affiliate relationships with our partners, including Amazon, Google and others.
Loading ...
Error!