This is a short book written in a concise style, very easy to read,but informative. The author has the honour of being head gardener of this ancient site, which he tends with care. The garden is not primarily an archaeological site and no buildings survive from the Anglo Saxon period, whence if has its origins, but in dry periods in summer faint traces 8n the landscape hint that earthen memories lurk sileny below.
Lambeth Palace is not a,royal palace,,but is the official residence of the archbishop. of Canterbury, the senior archbishop of the Anglican communion. The archbishop needed a residence. near. the capital city, so Lambeth became his working base. A garden came with the palace. .The palace and garden were built on an ancient Saxon site.the precise age is unknown, but it probably goes back to.the later years of the first Millennium when there was a small religious site. In the eleventh century the garden came into the hands of Goda, the sister of the defeated .and slain king Harold,and then after the Norman conquest to the hands of either monks or nuns. It was at that time substantially larger than it is today. The wider garden was then used partly for farming and also for gardening. Wooden structures were erected on site and it is possible to discern their traces when the ground is dry over summers.
The book is not written in a conventional academic style, though it is well researched and skillfully written. The style is light and popular and easy for general readers to handle, They contain historical material, but it is not presented in chronological sequence and it follows the author's train of experience.
Comments
The next-last sentence in the last subheading, Conclusion, alerts us that "beautiful places are oft threatened by capitalists endeavouring to turn them into car parks."
Are such changes as beautiful garden to car park arising because of the cooperative soil that gardening commitments cull and that correlates with construction not challenged by compacted soils?
A number oxsaxon aristocrats kept hold of personal wealth and land, for a while, if they did not fight for Harold. But it was a shor5 term measure, eventually they inte4rmar8ed with the saxonxs
Thank you for your comment below in answer to my previous observation and question.
Is it known how it is that King Harold the Fair's sister itinerated from Norman England with her "considerable wealth" intact?
The accomodztion would have meant making marriage alliances
The first subheading, An ancient site, advises us that "In the eleventh century the garden came into the hands of Goda, the sister of the defeated .and slain king Harold."
Internet sources carry Elisabeth van Houts' article King Harold's Sister Gunhild (d. 1087), a royal exile in Flanders" for The English Historical Review, volume 138, issue 590-591, pages 1-26 of February-April 2023.
The afore-designated author describes women as determining some "accommodation with the Conqueror" even as men decided upon exile.
What might that "accommodation" have meant about her "considerable wealth"?