But don’t be fooled, these people have read far, far more than the average passionate reader. Of course Eco hasn’t read all of his 60,000+ books in his library. Many of them are books he received from other people “as tributes;" he gives them to his students. How many rare books does he have? 1,200, he says. He has some nice stories about collecting some of them.
Then he has “a whole cellar full of translations” of his books. Being stuck with a few copies every time a book was translated (and his Name of the Rose was translated in 45 languages), he decided to send some of them away. He's also had his share of jury duty, and accumulated books from there as well. He says “the poets are by far the most dangerous.”
All this information might seem boring, but I find it’s rather funny that even in the age of so much electronic reading, we’re still inundated with books. Well, not we, but some people. Jean-Claude Carrière calculated, for fun, at some point in his life that, given a price of 6,000 euros per square meter, 12,000 euros per vertical meter, and the cost of making a bookcase, shelving each book cost him 42 euros.
Jean-Claude Carrière has 30,000 or 40,000 books, 2,000 of which are rare books.
Comments
MiraNov 11, 2014
DerdriuMarrinerNov 11, 2014
I appreciate digitization for easy availability in time and space: access any time, any place. Nevertheless, the concern which I've experienced in regard to electronic versions is that the standards of digitization are variable: missing pages and blurred images vs. clarity and completeness. It's quite disappointing to be confronted with messy versions of botanical and zoological images which were so beautifully drawn by their illustrators and were carefully printed into books in centuries past. When digitized with care, these illustrations can be quite stunning -- perhaps not quite as remarkable as the immediacy of paper, but nevertheless quite impressive.
MiraJan 24, 2013
katiem2Jan 24, 2013