If the problem were simple, we might be encouraged with the passage of a cold front. Why can we not say that if things were colder the damage is undone? But things are not so simple. And the damage is not so easily undone.
To make the problem understandable let me make a simple analogy. Place a pot on a stove and bring it to a high temperature. Once you take the pot from the stove there immediately is a start to cooling. The pot will soon enough be back to room temperature. So, when you decide to use the pot again it must start the heating process anew. The history of the pot has nothing to do with the reheating. That is how heating and cooling are known to us, so on a cold day it is natural to think the problem is over.
Now place mirrors around the pot and heat it again. When it is removed from the stove it will release heat, but the infrared rays will reflect back. The pot cannot cool as efficiently. And any heat added which might not go into the pot can also be reflected, giving the pot another chance to absorb energy.
In global warming the high greenhouse gas content acts like the mirror in the above scenario. So, even if the Earth cools temporarily the reheating caused by the heat trapping carbon dioxide will soon make reheating a repeat problem.





Comments
blackspanielgalleryFeb 8, 2017
frankbeswickFeb 8, 2017
Besides trees, two more of small ones of which I hope to plant tomorrow,peat bogs are also a valuable carbon store, so they should be protected, as we are trying to do in Britain.