Why Terrorism Cannot Win

London March 2017 and a nation is grieving its dead and indeed the dead of those who were visiting. The day was typical of Southern England in early Spring and the city was its usual bustling cosmopolitan self when a hired four by four car came down Westminster Bridge that leads across the Thames to the Houses of Parliament. At a certain spot, possibly because the driver espied three police officers, he deliberately veered onto the pavement and began mowing down pedestrians. Some were killed, though the officers survived, two badly injured, but a woman was killed and an elderly man died a day later of his injuries, his seventy five year old body incapable of bearing what had been done to him, and a male tourist perished, his wife among the many injured.

The killer drove on eventually ramming into the metal fence around parliament and then bursting out of the car,  raced round to the public entrance to the Houses of Parliament,armed with a machete and a knife, where he confronted an unarmed police officer, Keith Palmer, who bravely challenged him, only to fall as the killer's machete sliced into his stomach. Keith Palmer died later of his wounds.

Then unchecked the terrorist raced across a courtyard towards the entrance to the House of Commons, the lower house  of the UK parliament, approaching the secretary of state for defence, whose bodyguard  opened fire and planted four bullets into the killer's body. The terrorist, fifty two year old Khalid Masood, [not certain that this was his real name] later died of his wounds. Westminster  was in lock down for many hours as the police  checked whether there were any other terrorists and members of parliament were trapped in the houses of commons and the lords for many hours. One member witnessed the killing of the police officer and went to offer assistance and help the medical teams who were quickly on site.  

I cannot know directly the mind of a terrorist,I can only infer motives and interpret actions, but the motive, I believe, contains a desire to rule by terror. The strategy is to make the victim population submit out of fear. The terrorist wants to be seen as so determined to win that nothing will stop him/her, and the victim population will have to realize that even if one terrorist dies others will step into his shoes. Those who argue for appeasement on the grounds that challenging evildoers only makes them worse are party to this strategy, for the assumptions underlying their arguments are that the evildoers have the determination that we don't. This is  the coward's response.  

There is another motive behind some forms of terrorism, and this is that if the terrorist organizations launch world wide attacks and are ready to slaughter millions in the cause in the end only the supporters of the terrorist cause will be left. As the Islamic fundamentalists believe that they go to Heaven while their victims end in Hell, they can afford to die in combat. So they believe that this fact empowers their success.  

But did the terrorist succeed? London went about its daily business, unintimidated. Parliament met next day and publicly defied the murderer and his cause. The population gathered together in services to honour the fallen and the injured. Instead of driving a wedge between Muslims and wider British society the Muslim mayor of London led the people in their grieving. Faiths united in condemnation of the assault. No Muslim has as far as I know been attacked by angry mobs or individuals.

The dead so far included two Britons [the police officer and the elderly man] a Spanish lecturer and an American tourist, whose wife is among the injured. There was a Romanian woman catapulted into the Thames by the vehicle's impact, but she was  rescued, though badly injured. A party of French school pupils were slightly injured. Rather than drive a wedge between nations, those countries whose nationals were injured stood united behind the UK. President Trump, not a man to be intimidated, gave his support, as did the French President, and many other nations. The terrorist has failed, as he has united what he aspired to divide, aroused resistance and sympathy rather than craven submission. Black people, Whites,Asians, Americans, French, Spanish and many others gave their support. There was, we could see on the news, a wonderful spirit in London, quiet but loving and caring, united and defiant against those who would destroy it. Killer, you have lost!

The rationale behind utopian repression, the name that I give to those systems that believe that a wonderful world will arise out of terror and violence, is that when the enemies are defeated only the "Goodies" [the terrorist and his side] will remain. Then there will be a perfect world, all will he happy and obeying the right moral laws. We saw this nonsense in action when Pol Pot ruled Kampuchea and it did not work then. It will not work now. As we have seen as the world's nations united versus ISIS, the future offered by the terrorists is so horrific you cannot submit to it. It is a case of fight or die. Terrorism generates a reaction against itself. Ruling by terror is I believe emotionally exhausting, and eventually societies run by terror must wear themselves out. North Korea only survives by the power of China to the North, it would have failed years ago were it not for this support.  

What all societies must realize is that society develops not by huge revolutionary convulsions, but by quiet progress. It is by an organic process of development in which individuals and structures grow and develop through time and pass on their advantages to subsequent generations. I liken this to the growth of a flower. If you damage the plant at some time growth is slowed or distorted. But if you nurture it the plant will flourish towards a fulfilled future. By killing, the terrorist has damaged the great organism that is society, and our progress towards a better future is harmed. Children will grow up without their parents [for the police officer and the lecturer were father and mother respectively.] How will this serve to make a better future for the human race? It will not.

Yet the healing comes in society's reaction. Harm has been done, but there can be mending. Society must come together to support each other and help those harmed in the attack. Growth towards the better future has been slowed, impeded, but it is still going on, and it will not be the future that the terrorist envisaged.