Change the Drug Laws - The Legalization of drugs

Some start to take drugs such as cocaine, heroin and cannabis from a fairly young age and remained hooked for years.  They pay exorbitant prices to fund their habit, doing whatever it takes to obtain the money for their habit, detaching themselves from family and friends in some cases. Some steal from their own friends and family and therefore get ostracised by them.  Others risk their lives and future health by sharing needles and use drugs of unknown origin.

Some people start to take a drug to dull the pain of everyday living; some do it to feel a part of a community of other drug users as they feel like they belong nowhere else.  Some take it purely for entertainment; it is just a means of passing the time.  All pay extortionate black-market prices to drug dealers for the privilege of taking a drug that may eventually kill them. 

What if these drugs were made legal?  Would it reduce or increase the number of people hooked on the drugs?  Would it lose its novelty perhaps and therefore not entice as many young people?  Or would there suddenly be an increase in the number of people taking the drug as all the barriers are removed?

My argument has always been a moral one - Removing the line of right and wrong from the equation by legalising drugs such as heroin will cause more people to choose to take the drug. I want my children to know with certainty that if they choose to take drugs they are WRONG!

How would I feel if my teenager popped her head round the door and mentioned in passing that she was off to the doctor to get a supply of heroin.  What would my argument with her be?

My partner takes an opposing view and if not for my moral hard line, I would go with him.  He thinks  that legalizing illegal drugs would shift the sale of drugs from the black market to retail outlets like pharmacies or prescriptions from doctors. There would no longer be drug dealers hanging around school gates trying to hook our kids.   If the drugs were legal, there would be no point.  It would be like me, the pharmacist, hanging round the children trying to make them take Nurofen.  Why would I need to?  If they have a headache, they can come into my pharmacy.  I do not need to go to them.

It would also bring the whole industry out of the shadows, removing some of its mystique.  I can see that as people tend to be more attracted to the perception of mischief and the 'bad boy' thing.

In the UK, methadone is used as a means to get people off heroin.  Methadone is more addictive than heroin and yet can be used legally whereas heroin cannot.  Only the drug dealers can supply it.  As a pharmacist, I see people on methadone for years and years with no change to the quantity they have to take.  I have even seen patients go into rehab determined to rid themselves of methadone and come back to the pharmacy with prescriptions for a greater daily amount of methadone as their bodies had reacted badly to the reduction regime!

Methadone is obtained usually for free – though not free for the tax payer.

In these austere times, there is a need to increase each government’s coffers; this could be a means of doing that.  Looking at this report from 2004 and based on the UK, tax of 6.3 billion pounds could be raised if the drug users and drug suppliers were taxed.  Seeing that the present government in the UK came into power proclaiming that savings of £6bn would be achieved rapidly, taxing the drug barons and users could be a source of this money.  This might reduce the need to make cuts on the money and jobs provided by the government.

I wonder…