Despite concern that his paintings should reflect only the instantaneous effects of mist, smog and sunlight, Monet admitted that there was something uniquely beautiful about London and he was anxious to retain the effects of a ‘London-like’ atmosphere.
Therefore, despite his efforts to avoid social pointers in his Thames series, Monet’s depiction of industrial smog and the veiling of the river and its surroundings might arguably be the very epitome of alienating modernity. What was that famous phrase by Karl Marx in The Communist Manifesto?
"All that is solid melts into air..."
Monet probably didn't have thoughts like these as he dashed along the Thames Embankment chasing the elusive sun. But a twenty-first century viewer may be struck by the conditions that inspired Monet’s paintings of the Thames, a situation unimaginable before the Industrial Revolution and made impossible now by the passing of the Clean Air Act in 1956.
It would seem that despite his purely aesthetic aims, Monet's work may have social significance, even in retrospect.
Comments
KathleenDuffyJan 4, 2014
cmoneyspinnerJan 4, 2014
KathleenDuffyApr 19, 2013
KathleenDuffyApr 1, 2013
EliasZanettiApr 1, 2013
KathleenDuffyMar 31, 2013
JoHarringtonMar 31, 2013