From its early days and first implementation of Page Rank algorithm, Google forbade selling links. After all, if people link to your content without monetary incentive, it has to mean that it is useful or important to them in some way.
In those early days, first paid SEO services showed up. Most of them had no idea what they were doing but the Dot Com bust was just starting. A lot of money ended up wasted on some useless linking services and soon, Google coined the term “link-farm” and first Google slaps ensued.
Latest Google slap of sites using one paid SEO service shows how expensive SEO shortcuts can be.
Comments
I'm grateful for the new update, over night I went from not listed (a site that was less then a month old) to first page on a few keywords.
Very informative article - its better to implement along term SEO strategy and steer clear from the quick-fix measures that can land you in big trouble with Google - writing and publishing quality content has placed my pages and sites at the top of the google search page for certain keywords even those that I have not been intently targeting! Try to Google this this query fro example - Does Google prioritize freshness over relevancy?
thanks for the article
I think that variety is important with SEO and backlinking. If you put all of your eggs in one basket, then you will certainly run the risk of losing your position in the SERPs at some point. It doesn't even need to be a cataclysmic event like BMR getting trashed - it could just be that something that you rely upon doesn't work quite so well for some reason.
Diversity is the key I think.
You've got me thinking, very good information here, you never know whats going to wash out here in the internet stream of panning. Very useful and practical food for thought. Good things come to those who wait seems to be the theme.
So far, reports vary. It's great to hear that you've had no bad side-effects from Google's de-indexing of BMR network.
I think that you are right about possibility of killing-off the competition and that Google should consider that possibility. Still, I read about people who lost their AdSense account simply because somebody submitted their sites to traffic exchanges. It is a crazy world out there...
I've seen no drop at all with the sites I used BMR aggressively with. In fact some seem to have popped up a couple of places. I'm surprised because just the de-indexing of the links should have caused some drop.
I very much doubt there will be any penalty though -apart from the loss of links - otherwise it would be trivially easy to kill off your competitors - just by sending links to them.
True, the rules change constantly and there are no shortcuts that can't turn around and bite you when you least expect it.
You really must resist temptation and stay away from all that kind of stuff. You never know when they will change the rules in the middle of the game to serve their best interests and all your work goes down the drain. This is a good article, thanks.