Waiting for ages on a gurney is psychologically traumatic, but that isn't nearly all there is to tell here.
Death by needle is supposed to be a quiet affair. The victim slips into sleep, then dies with barely a murmur. Unless they don't.
Bennie Demps's execution was a literal bloodbath. No suitable vein could be found, so wardens began cutting him to find one. Three large bore marks were etched into his groin and legs, and he was 'bleeding profusely' from them. There were lesser scratches elsewhere.
When the curtain was finally raised to display him, a white sheet had been draped over him to cover up the injuries. Bennie screamed at witnesses, "They butchered me back there. This is not an execution, it is murder." Sutures were now in place to stem the flow of blood.
But they had got the catheters into his arms now and Bennie died on June 7th 2000, in Texas, USA.
Raymond Landry Sr. was a muscular man. One warden described him as having arms like cartoon character Popeye. Finding a vein was not a problem. Keeping it in was very much one.
Two minutes after the catheter was inserted and the drugs started flowing, it started leaking. For one moment, the deadly cocktail was dribbling down Raymond's arm, but then the pressure became too much.
The whole syringe came loose and the tube shot up into the air. The liquid drugs showered over everyone present and drenched the window, behind which witnesses watched in horror.
Wardens rushed to stop the flow and a curtain was drawn back to shield onlookers from the scene on the gurney now. However, they could still hear everything.
For over 14 minutes there was movement with doors opening and closing. They overheard Raymond groaning loudly, then silence. When the curtain was drawn back, he was already dead, staring motionless up at the ceiling.
This same scenario occurred again at the execution of Joseph Cannon, in Texas, USA, on April 23rd, 1989. His vein collapsed as the drugs rushed through the tube and the catheter just popped out.
An incredulous Joseph must have thought that he was saved. He looked at it and gasped at witnesses, "It's come undone!" Then his head fell back onto the gurney and he closed his eyes in relief.
Prison wardens merely closed the curtains, so that witnesses could no longer see. But they heard Joseph start to cry. He was visibly weeping, when the curtains parted again fifteen minutes later. The execution started again and this time it killed him.
Incidentally, Joseph had been on Death Row for twenty-one years for a murder committed when he was just seventeen years old. He was also schizophrenic. Both his mental state and the fact that he was a juvenile at the time of receiving his death penalty rendered his case extremely controversial.
In 1989, Texan prison officials and execution witnesses were just not prepared for what was about to happen to Stephen McCoy. Unknown to all present, including the victim, he was allergic to Pentothol.
As soon as the drugs hit Stephen's system, it was obvious that his reaction was not textbook. His chest starting heaving and he gasped for breath. Next he began choking, before a fully fledged seizure threatened to tear the straps from his limbs. His back arched and he was obviously asphyxiating.
The scene was so violent that one of the male witnesses fainted outright, collapsing onto the lady beside him. Everyone watching had turned pale and Stephen's lawyer honestly believed that a chain reaction of fainting would begin. But then Stephen died in front of their eyes.
It had not been lethal injection per se that had killed him, but his allergic reaction to it. The Texas Attorney General Jim Mattox opined that the dosage in the tubes may have been too strong.
On March 10th, 1992, something very similar occurred in Oklahoma during the execution of Robyn Lee Parks. Spasms began in his abdomen and assaulted his neck and jaw too. He started choking, gasping out for breath.
It took eleven minutes for Robyn to die, in an execution which a witness called 'scary and ugly'.
Shortly afterwards, it happened yet again in Texas. Justin Lee May displayed all of the now classic signs of allergic reaction. He started coughing raucously, as his body went into spasm. His mouth wide in a gasping scream, Justin's back arched so violently that all of the straps were strained to the limit of their endurance.
Then his body froze and he slumped back onto the gurney. Horrified witnesses still heard groans, but Justin was now paralyzed. His eyes and mouth remained fixed open until the very end.
On May 3rd 1995, in Missouri, USA, Emmitt Foster's death by lethal injection did not go well. The drugs had been in his system for seven minutes. He should have been comatosed by now, but he was wide awake and gasping for air. He should have also been paralyzed, but his body was wracked by convulsions. He should have been dead, but he patently was not.
The curtains were drawn to save the witnesses from any more distress, but they could still hear Emmitt's desperate struggles on the gurney.
The Washington County Coroner William "Mal" Gum was waiting in another room ready to receive the corpse. As the nearest medical man, he was requested to go into the death chamber and give his expert opinion on what could possibly be done to end Emmitt's suffering.
William agreed to go in and he spotted the problem immediately. The straps on the gurney were so tight that they were cutting off the big man's circulation. The drugs were all trapped behind them, so couldn't reach either Emmitt's brain nor heart. This had now been on-going for thirty minutes.
The wardens loosened the straps and Emmitt quickly died shortly afterwards.
Convulsions were very much in evidence for the execution of Scott Carpenter, in Oklahoma, USA, on May 8th 1997. At first, there were just groans, then his stomach and chest began 'pulsing'. His complexion turned yellowish grey, before the first convulsion began. It was very violent; and it was the first of eighteen such seizures.
It took eleven minutes for Scott to die. He did so in agony, with his face now turned a vicious purple and his jaw clenched. Finally the convulsions became less frenzied. There were eight mild spasms, until he died with a final gasp.
Comments
JoHarringtonJun 16, 2012
It looks and sounds like torture to me. Something medieval and horrific in the 21st century.
KariJun 16, 2012
I get my blood drawn very frequently for medical reasons. I only have one "good vein" and it is very scarred because of that. Reading this all I could think of is how hard it is to get a vein in other places but how easy fixing a few of those problems could be.
A final meal of a hamburger or pie when not given enough liquid can make veins tiny. Not being able to move a bit can slow blood flow and also make veins tiny. Sometimes removing a tourniquet is necessary to make certain veins usable and not just in the hands.
I have no medical degree and I knew those things. The idea that the people administering the drugs don't know that or even have the common sense to guess it makes this all the more horrifying to me.
Also I know the pain is nothing all things considered, but built up scar tissue being pierced is not a poke. Most often it feels like a small stabbing like with a Swiss army knife.
JoHarringtonMay 15, 2012
I tended to follow the information, which in turn was very US-centric. But you are right, there should be more about the other countries which use lethal injections. I will see what I can uncover.
nickuptonMay 15, 2012
JoHarringtonApr 30, 2012
I've had some moments with needles which has made me very wary of them. I remember once being given a tetanus jab that hurt so much I screamed and flinched. The nurse jumped and the needle came out, it went back in further across my arm. That hurt even more. Then she still had to take it out and insert it where it should have been in the first place.
I learned to stay still from that one.
LucasApr 30, 2012
(And as Katie said, having them digging for veins hurts like hell... Happened once, and never wanted to repeat the experience...)
JoHarringtonApr 30, 2012
Katie - I'm very glad that it was informative! Reading your comment made me proud to have written it, as it was highlighting precisely this sort of stuff that I wanted to get out there. It's a terrible subject to have to consider, so many people never do. They just assume that everything happens to the best of everyone's abilities. With lethal injection in particular, there seems a mindset that it's just like lying down and going to sleep. The only difference being that the victim doesn't wake up again later.
katiem2Apr 29, 2012
Von von VonnApr 29, 2012
I would never change a finished article, (or only add new updates if recent news).
Just my thougts
Von von VonnApr 29, 2012
Maybe I am wrong, maybe it will make your work even better
How to organize an article...
First off, what is it you want to write or do with the article? inform, persuade, different reason? But please do not try to focus on both in one article. Only inform, or inform only to persuade.
Organization of an essay to persuade
Start is always preamble, what is the subject , and the thesis you want to attack/defend.
Arguments from both sides, often new paragraph every new argument.
In the end a conclusion with a small summary of previous paragraphs that concludes that an justified opinion on the thesis.
rs-jagex-microtransactions I think is a well-organized article.
What is your audience? Some people say (awesome argument, always works for Fox News) that if writing for a college audience, write it for high-school
If writing for high-school audience, write it for 10-year old. It does make some sense to me. Keep it simple.
If you do want to share more in- depth information, I would use a link to the source. More links, more sources, more credible, and if people want to go in depth, they can. And for the random stupid consumer, they can still get the point without reading all the information.
Do you know Cracked? (the site). I love most of those articles (the rest is not good, only the articles). I would totally read the most 5 gruesome lethal-injections that went horrible wrong? Some morbid jokes and informative mostly, and most of this information speaks for itself.
Keep writing, and I want to dare you to write an article for Cracked. No clue about pay-out and stuff, but I think bigger audience.
Thank you for the Thank you.
JoHarringtonApr 29, 2012
I'm so passionate about this subject that I want all of the truths to be self-evident. I want to touch all bases and have the arguments laid out, one after the other, everything that could possibly be leveled against it. I see murders happening in some vicious circle, because that one was deemed wrong, but this one was deemed right and moral. And I want to scream.
Instead, I research my facts, present my evidence and hope that enough people start paying attention that, along the way, lives get saved. Ok, I know that I can't do that on my own, but I can contribute my chapter.
What you're doing is telling me the best way to go about that. I thought it was to lay it all out. You're saying that bite-sized pieces is best.
Thank you.
Von von VonnApr 29, 2012
For 'western world' and death penalty, only usa exist. For the rest only China. The rest of the world is not there, (for the media etc.)
I see in your article that you are have alot of knowledge/resource into it, but I think its not one coherent story, sometimes to much detail.
Start was good, sometimes bit too subjective with comparisons.
Some absurd detail about some company that produced drug, some talk about other countries, and a lot of death people cases. For a layman it is in some parts too much detail. And it is uncertain to me, what the point really is, you want to make. Or to many different points.
In an article, try to just touch the bases, with small anecdotes, two or three cases and move on. And for more details, maybe a different article.
What you have written is good, but you can split it in like 5 different articles.
Most information is USA-based I think, so maybe.
execution in other countries,
waiting for death (the system, legal, waiting),
death penalty legal injection (just about whats in it, the procedure, 2-3 cases.)
The extreme case of person x.
Morality
Innocent after death penalty. (ooh, thats 6 already)
In my opinion you tried to touch and tell all and as much in one article. I did read most of the article, but at some parts my head just hurt.
That is it. You know too much! What is better a soccer-player or a professor at a University? Economic value of course.
About tying up, just my effort for some morbid joke. I stuff like that, like black mirror by Charlie Brooker.
And do not tell me I just tried to write an article about your article. Remember I told you that I am lazy. Ooh, and you just got yourself a new fan, and probably will comment more random phrases in the future.
JoHarringtonApr 28, 2012
By law, in the US at least, the witnesses are supposed to watch the execution. It's something about ensuring that it all took place. But I can think of at least two where the curtains were closed, then re-opened once the victim was dead.
I don't think you can put a time limit on good articles. It's not the actual writing which is the issue, it's the research. If you were knowledgeable about the subject, then an amazing article could be knocked out in minutes (albeit a rather short one!). This one took me 16 hours to research and write, but I'm an AI activist, so I already had a wide understanding of the issues behind that too.
I'm sorry that you thought it was rushed and unfocused. I was trying to create a broad overview for those new to the subject. It could also be a reference for future articles, where I do get more specific about individual cases.
Von von VonnApr 28, 2012
Von von VonnApr 28, 2012
Reason to tie the prisoner up, is that he does not feel on the floor, and the spectators would miss the show. We wouldn't want that.
Article I think is a bit to general and not really focused, seems bit rushed too.
First thought was, I see a lot of letters
I read on Cracked that a good article can take 50 hours. But who am I to say, I'm just a lazy person, who does not write articles, and just comments on other peoples work.
JoHarringtonApr 28, 2012
Prison isn't ideal by any stretch of the imagination. Loss of liberty is a big one, but the least of some of their problems. However, until someone comes up with a better solution, then it's the best response that we have to keeping a dangerous person off the streets.
Ok, just moved hanging up my priority list for this series. <3 Let's just say that hanging is so gruesome that people embraced the electric chair to get away from it.
LucasApr 28, 2012
I'm assuming that the thing forbidding the nurses from participating is this provision in their code of ethics.. The "patient" in this case, though he may be healthy, should be considered as dying since he's most probably going to be dead in a short time. By helping with inserting the necessary catheters, the nurse is saving the prisoner from being stabbed repeatedly, thus relieving pain. And since the nurse wouldn't be the one inserting the drugs to kill him, she's not acting "with the sole intent of ending a patient's life". Then again, my interpretation is most probably rather different from others...
Better solution (in the event that death is a must): Having alternative methods of death sentence. Maybe hanging, or something else, for cases where lethal injection is problematic (allergies, collapsed veins, obesity)... While not being the best way to handle criminals, death sentence, imo, is far more humane than the torture of being imprisoned for life.
JoHarringtonApr 28, 2012
Executioners, especially in lethal injection, come in threes and one is a dummy tube, solely so they can live with the guilt. It shows how distressing this is for them. A frightening number of people executed later turn out to have been innocent. It's a bit late then for any measure of compensation.
The information about doctors not being able to do it is available, but most people do seem to assume that it's all done within proper medical procedures. That's why a lot of people support it.
I'm glad that this article gave pause for thought. Thank you for your comment.
Lucas - I'm glad that you saw this. I was going to do firing squad next, but after you commented on an earlier article in this series, I bumped up the priority of lethal injection.
In many prisons, the wardens doing this are trained up to paramedic level. But that doesn't include everything that can go wrong with needles. The job of a paramedic is to stabilize a condition until a doctor or nurse can get to them. As soon as you get into higher training, then you become a nurse (thus banned from participation by the American Nursing Association) or a doctor (thus banned from participation by the Hippocratic Oath and the American Medical Association).
Pharmacists can't get involved, because their association equally prohibits them.
Yes, any American company could set up business manufacturing drugs based on these chemicals. That is not a problem. What is a problem is the sheer volume of lawsuits that every single Death Row prisoner throws at the system. American companies would be in a constant state of having to attend court. The litigation costs are not covered by the much, much smaller costs of selling the drugs in the first place.
In addition there's business reputation. No pharmaceutical company wants their brand name anywhere near drugs that kill, even legally.
Erk! Yes, that should have read 'lethal injection'. I've edited it in the hope that the 10 people already voting sussed that too.
LucasApr 27, 2012
(And the last question, was it supposed to be asking about death via lethal injection or electric chairs?)