
George Stinney Jr may have been innocent.
There were no witnesses, no evidence and nothing to link him to the scene of the crime.
His family claim that George was in the house doing his homework at the time. When the cry went up that two young girls were missing, he joined the search party to find them.
Moreover, George and his sister informed the sheriff that they had seen the missing girls earlier in the day. Betty June Binnicker and Mary Emma Thames had been picking flowers, when the siblings passed by.
The Stinneys carried on home, but it had been a link. That single sighting was enough to see George arrested and herded into the local police station, once the bodies of both girls had been found.
The teenager was reportedly given ice-cream (or a candy bar) to confess to the murders. He'd been locked in a room with several police officers for over an hour. He was neither offered nor given access to a lawyer.
His parents were barred from the vicinity, not allowed to see him until after his trial. As soon as George had been arrested, his father had been fired from his job at the local lumber yard. Their home was owned by his ex-employer and it was instantly forfeit. Most of the town was owned by the same man and the Stinneys were told outright to leave on the next train. They weren't given time to pack.
Outside the cells, a mob of local people had gathered, convinced that a child murderer was housed inside. They demanded that the teenager be brought out and handed over. The sheriff refused, transferring him instead to Charleston for George's own protection. His family had no idea where he'd gone.
George Stinney Jr was held in isolation, until he went to court a month later. There his court appointed lawyer Charles Plowden didn't attempt to prove his client's innocence. Instead, the whole case rested on whether a fourteen year old could be held accountable for his actions.
The jury took just 10 minutes to state that he could and should receive the death penalty. Plowden stated that there would be no appeal.
Until now, young George had remained relatively calm. The court records describe him as co-operative. Observers noted that he was very polite.
But all indications show that he had no idea about the depth of trouble he was in. The boy certainly didn't know that he would be facing the death penalty.
Once the verdict was read out, George started to panic. Back at the prison, he was allowed to write to his mother. He sent a letter. He swore hadn't committed the crimes. He begged her to help him.
Neither George, nor the authorities, mentioned that he'd already been on trial. What could she do, except pray? Mrs Stinney was not an educated lady. She was illiterate. Her daughter had to read that heart-breaking letter to her.





It has been nearly 70 years since George Stinney Jr was executed, but his remaining siblings still sound raw with emotion when they talk about it. In amongst the facts, statistics and human rights issues, it's often difficult to get a sense of the boy at the center of it.
That was no comfort to Amie Stinney though. Mrs Robinson recalled that their mother wouldn't stop crying. Her 'little eyes (were) all swollen', as she prayed endlessly for God to change the minds of her son's captors. She kept repeating over and over again that her son didn't do it.




Comments
JoHarringtonDec 27, 2014
JoHarringtonDec 27, 2014
JoHarringtonDec 27, 2014
RuthCoxDec 19, 2014
ChunkydDec 18, 2014
JustMeDec 17, 2014
Do any of you have ANY idea what kind of "justice system" exists in other counties?
Seriously, find yourself behind bars in Mexico, Thailand, Turkey, China or Africa and get back to me.
JoHarringtonSep 25, 2014
RuthCoxSep 24, 2014
JoHarringtonSep 23, 2014
I hadn't considered that about the interviewer here. What you said about Rev Stinney's attitude curing the world's ills mirrors something that Eva Mozes Kor said yesterday on Reddit. Here http://www.reddit.com/r/HaShoah/comments/2h4u1g/rhashoahs_first_ama_i_am_eva_mozes_kor_survivor/ckphg0e and here http://www.reddit.com/r/HaShoah/comments/2h4u1g/rhashoahs_first_ama_i_am_eva_mozes_kor_survivor/ckpgdf0 Funny that the same suggestion, in two separate places, should come up within a day of each other. Perhaps it's the universe agreeing.
I'd love to see President Obama simply wipe George Stinney Jr's record clean. But there will always be those who say it was a political move. It needs to occur in a court of law, so it can be a judge saying it with all due regard for the law. Sad, but still the world in which we live.
RuthCoxSep 23, 2014
But of course, there is also the prejudice that even the Rev. Stinney mentioned in his interview, prevalent back then, and that nobody could do anything about it. It was accepted as a fact of life. So sad. Yet, still, so inspiring that the Rev. Skinney has no hatred, never has, and says his family doesn't either, then or now.
This brings up something else, on the flip side, that concerns me. I do not feel it is right when others, outsiders for lack of a better word, having their own agenda, maybe even their own hatefulness, attempt to instill that in those who have come to terms with it in their own forgiving and accepting way. And in listening very closely to the interview with the Rev. (twice) I do believe the interviewer was trying to stir something up that is not in that man.
Don't get me wrong... I believe there is not a thing right about what occurred, about the deaths of any of these children. I also believe those wrongs cannot be cured with hate. Honestly, the attitude held by the Rev. Stinney is more likely to cure what ails the world where racism and hate are concerned.
Reopen the case? No. For crying out loud, let the man in the White House wipe George Stinney's record clean without further ado. He takes power in his hands when it's for his agenda, so why not for this boy's name... (My apologies for the book I've written on your space.)
JoHarringtonSep 8, 2014
frankbeswickSep 8, 2014
JoHarringtonSep 8, 2014
VioletteRoseSep 8, 2014
JoHarringtonSep 8, 2014
SilvermavenSep 8, 2014
JoHarringtonMar 7, 2014
tonyMar 6, 2014
JoHarringtonFeb 11, 2014
JoeFeb 11, 2014
JoHarringtonJan 23, 2014
frankbeswickJan 23, 2014
JoHarringtonJan 22, 2014
DeanJan 22, 2014
NEWS ALERT....He still lives in the heart and minds of hundreds of callus Carolinians even today. Hatred and racism runs so deep that its probably a DNA trait by now. Even 70 years later some people aren't even emotionally moved by the actions of that community, instead, they just engineer new ways of suppression within the legislative body of a controlled State (both North and South Carolina) and supported by right-wing radio talk shows to feed the crazies.
JoHarringtonJan 21, 2014
EmberJan 21, 2014
:C
JoHarringtonJan 21, 2014
JyreeilJan 21, 2014
JoHarringtonJan 21, 2014
Raquel LeevingJan 21, 2014
Raquel LeevingJan 21, 2014
JoHarringtonJan 21, 2014
NicoleJan 21, 2014
JoHarringtonJan 21, 2014
Frank - I'm in full agreement with you there.
frankbeswickJan 21, 2014
Pamiss45Jan 21, 2014
This case has racial injustice, conflict of interest, no evidence at time of trial.
This child's name needs to be cleared!
JoHarringtonJan 20, 2014
JeanetteJan 18, 2014
JoHarringtonApr 15, 2013
TyApr 12, 2013
JoHarringtonOct 13, 2012
I hope that things work out for your friend. Have you contacted Amnesty International?
Holistic_HealthOct 13, 2012
JoHarringtonOct 8, 2012
They'd all done 18 years and 78 days, with the eldest fighting for his life, when modern DNA tests proved them all innocent.
Sheri_OzOct 8, 2012
Aside from the guilty-innocent aspect, it is also not right that kids are sentenced to life imprisonment without chance of parole even if they are able to be rehabilitated. I wrote about that on squidoo and found that even some of the victims' families are not happy with this state of affairs.
JoHarringtonSep 24, 2012
barbarabSep 3, 2012
JoHarringtonJul 24, 2012
Glory Robin Diane PorterJul 24, 2012
JoHarringtonFeb 8, 2012
It boggles the mind, doesn't it?
BrendaReevesFeb 8, 2012
JoHarringtonJan 5, 2012
When I was researching this story, I came across a comment which said that the lack of evidence was the reason the case would never be reopened. Basically there would be nothing for a modern judge to base an opinion on. I found that an extraordinary view, but apparently it's one with traction in legal terms.
I have to confess that I think the death penalty per se is disgraceful, but I'm particularly disturbed when such a young boy is at the centre. I have a teenager the same age here and I was picturing him throughout the writing of this article.
The American justice system does have a long history of executing children. Until 2005, the USA was the world leader in such, though in fairness that was due solely to the state of Texas. There's currently a moratorium, but it's not illegal. What tends to happen these days is that the appeal process continues until the child is over 18, then they are executed, if the appeal fails.
The Stinney family are adamant that they want this case reopened. His surviving siblings are now in their 80s and they have lived with this all of their lives.
spiritualityJan 5, 2012
I'm mixed on reopening the case, especially since the American justice system hasn't used this as precedence to execute other boys for crimes they probably didn't commit. My personal sense is that the energy should go into making sure this kind of thing doesn't happen again and into making sure the people currently on death row are given every chance to get out of there.
On the other hand, I'm sure the family would feel better if the case WAS reopened. This is a gross miscarriage of justice on so many levels.