Many ex-offenders struggle when they are asked to consider their existing skills. That might be because they have an extensive criminal record, have served dozens of prison sentences and may never have held down a legitimate job. If this applies to you, fear not, because during those prison or community sentences, and even whilst engaging in criminal activity, you have put to use a number of skills and probably acquired new ones along the way.
Reflect for a while; think about all the prison and community sentences you may have served. Did you work whilst in prison? Did you take part in educational courses? Did you workout in the gym, or take any courses related to physical fitness or training? What about courses relating to your offending behaviour, you must, at some point, have taken part in those? Have you ever been a prison listener? Have you helped other prisoners with literacy issues read and write letters?
Think about all the things you may have done in the past, and then consider which skills are needed to carry out those tasks.
Working whilst in prison not only requires organisational ability, but the ability to work as part of a team. Furthermore, you will also have needed the ability to follow directions. In fact, in some prisons, work is only allocated to those who are deemed trustworthy- the trustees, they can be relied upon to complete a task effectively and with minimum supervision. A prison listener, must of course, be a good listener, and helping other prisoners with their letters requires good communication skills and patience. Take a look at all those skills..
Well organised.
Works well in a team.
Able to take and follow instructions carefully.
Effective worker.
Task oriented.
Requires minimum supervision.
Listening skills.
Communication skills.
Patience with others.
For ex-offenders who have previously enjoyed a career, a professional life, the transition to joblessness because of a criminal record can be devastating. Initially, some people can't see past the fact that all their training and education can no longer be utilized in the career of their choice. But the good news is, that skill set may be highly valued in a different role, a role where your criminal record is not as important as the experience you bring to the job.
Obviously, the number of professions where skills, experience and qualifications overlap are far too numerous to mention here. However, this is a really important exercise to undertake- you need to think about where your skills and education might be valuable, even if, albeit, in a completely different role.
A number crunching account with a criminal record may not be trusted with other people's money again, but they'll have more than enough experience to teach arithmetic to adults, or deliver courses about using spread sheets, or write an e-book about tax law. Did you notice that those roles involve working with adults, or making your own employment?
Although not always the case, in the UK many of the jobs that are exempt form the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act (we'll come to that soon) involve working with vulnerable people and children, or belong to one of the professions. However, there are a number of roles which involve working with adults who are not considered vulnerable, and who may require knowledge and expertise which you can provide.
Comments
Catana, the information contained within this page offers some information which is pertinent to offenders from countries other than the UK, such as *how to disclose a criminal record* by far one of the biggest stumbling blocks for offenders when it comes to gaining employment, irrespective of their nationality. Also relevance and how appropriate any potential employment may be. This is yet another area where ex-offenders set themselves up to fail. If you do some homework, you'll see that there is a weight of evidence supporting my claim . But when specifics; such as law, disclosure and resources are offered the article is, indeed, Uk centric.
In fairness, I have no idea what your experience and/or qualifications might be when it comes to offender employment and education. Perhaps you have just read a few books about human rights and penal institutions and therefore feel qualified to make assumptions and offer unsupported and mostly outlandish claims, or perhaps you have developed some expertise and have real life experience, training and qualifications when it comes to this issue. Like myself perhaps. In which case, I would suggest writing an article of your own about said topic.
It does appear that you have read this article in its entirety now, which is indeed progress. However, as this particular page has received an EC award, receives lots of organic hits and comments and also appears to answer the search queries, I think it's doing pretty well without any revisions.
In fact, I really don't feel that your comments offer any further value to the reader, so I will, therefore, disable any further comments that you might wish to make.
I live in the UK, it's on my profile, therefore my experience is in the UK. Also, if you'd had read the article in it's entirety, you would have noticed that the discussion focused on disclosure and the law, makes specific references to the UK. In fact, so do the resources offered and there are also references to employment in the UK.
I wouldn't write about the situation in the US. I tend only to comment and write about issues where I have in depth knowledge.
Part 2.
"And the majority of prisons have absolutely no occupational training, nor do they offer any help in adjusting to freedom" Again, I have to ask, are you just pulling these statements from the top of your head? *Every* prison in the UK offers occupational training, which is certified and nationally recognised. Furthermore, there are whole teams in prisons who focus on nothing but resettlement and helping prisoners adjust with life on the outside. The problem is revolving door offenders, they serve from a few days to a couple of weeks at most. There simply is not enough time to train them and help prepare them for life on the outside.
"At a guess, I'd say that this advice is pretty useless for all but a very tiny percentage: specifically those who have a decent education and have some internet know-how."
Wrong again, offenders with a decent education are 40 times more likely to secure employment within six months of release than offenders with poor levels of literacy and numeracy. In other words, they are the least likely to find this page particularly helpful, except when it comes to the intricacies of the ROA.
Also, just for the record, illiterate and innumerate ex-offenders are far from stupid. They may not be internet savvy but have learnt, throughout their lives, how to overcome obstacles where reading, writing and tech know-how are involved. They will often have a *trusted* helper who will read their mail for them, access pages on the internet and relay information to them from books and other materials. This applies both within the prison walls and beyond them.
Part I.
Catana, thank you for your *opinions and assumptions*
I think, which is perhaps my fault, you have failed to comprehend the points that I have been trying to across. I was not attempting to make it *sound* as if it's the persons own fault if they cannot get a job, I was suggesting however, that a job will not just land in the lap of an ex-offender if they do not approach job hunting in an organised and clearly thought out way.*fact* How do I know this? Eight years working with offenders, two of those years as an employment and education specialist, and two of those years working in a high security institution working pre release with prolific offenders who had major resettlement issues.
"Many ex-inmates have been in prison for years" I find this statement somewhat vague to say the least. Furthermore, as this article is aimed at offenders in the UK, I can honestly say that your statement " Many of them go in without any idea how to apply for jobs, and they come out with even less because things have changed so much while they were inside" is not only factually inaccurate, but completely absurd. In the UK, employment is seen as a key factor when comes to reducing rates of recidivism. Consequently, successive governments have pumped millions of pounds into initiatives to help offenders, both in custody and those serving community sentences, with job search, interview techniques etc. Also, many prisons partner with local business who recruit inmates prior to their release. In addition, long serving prisoners are far more likely to be serving their sentence in open institutions. What does this have to do with offender employment you might ask? Well, inmates in open prisons have regular paid employment outside the prison, in the local community. Long serving prisoners are least likely to have problems in this regard.
"A hefty percentage are are illiterate or semi-literate," Yes, I did discuss this at length, you mustn't have read the paragraphs about literacy and education.
"and couldn't qualify for any but the most low-paying jobs, even if they weren't ex-offenders" Newsflash, in the UK at the present time, many highly skilled and well educated people are having to take low paying jobs. But just in case you missed those paragraphs too, I have also offered some advice as to how ex-offenders can secure funding for occupational training if they need to.
Vocal-pen, there are some restrictions in the UK too, however, they largely depend on the offence and it's relationship to employment, or vice versa. As far as I'm aware though, with the exception of those subjected to control orders (or any new equivalent) there are no rules which completely exclude an ex-offender from the labour market. However, if I were to be told differently this would not surprise me in the least. Which is a very sad state of affairs indeed.
How can an individual turn their life around if they are denied the opportunity to do so?
great information. the sad thing is it's worse in the states; because many offenses have requirements that inhibit work, making it even more difficult to do the right things
Thank you, Georgette.
That's an excellent point. Sadly, many ex-offenders are not in a position to pay their legal fees, period. In the Uk there's all kinds of tinkering going on with the legal aid system, our criminal justice system is infested with the cancer of corruption and our media (yours too, I'm thinking of news corp) appear to have jumped out of the pages of 1984.
It's tough for all of us, but ex-offenders have a very raw deal. On the one hand, they are constantly told that they need to get a job and walk the straight and narrow path, on the other, they are asked why they should be given opportunities over and above people who have not offended. A catch 22.
Hollie I agree completely with your idea of application censoring with interview disclosure especially in a society that has reached a point where sadly, many people feel forced to accept plea agreements (serve minimal time) rather than chance spending a great deal of money in legal fee's, putting their family through the process, and taking a risk of being found guilty considering the statistics presented of winning with a jury trial in the average case is in favor of the prosecution, often regardless of the evidence. The "burden of proof" has shifted tremendously. Great article on an excellent topic.
Cazort, on the one hand, you have to ask the question; how many sentences should an individual serve for the same offence, how many times and in how many ways should they be punished ? The stigma of a conviction follows ex-offenders for many,many years. If I had my way, and if the offence was not of a serious nature, I'd suggest that the application was censored to the interviewers, and that they shortlisted applicants based on merit. At the interview, ex-offenders should disclose and offer up their experience.
Ex-offenders are people who've made mistakes and paid for them. If they are looking for opportunities to better themselves and walk the right path, I believe that they should be given the opportunity.:)
I think this is a really important topic. I think that the ways in which convicted felons are treated in the U.S. is pretty appalling. Our constitution supposedly protects people against cruel and unusual punishment, but I think that the way in which people are treated by society can sometimes get into this zone--punishing people long after they've served their time. But I like how you take a pro-active approach on this page, emphasizing the things people can do to take responsibility and better their employment situation.