Synopsis: A talented artist is about to finish his greatest painting when an accident causes him to permanently lose his eyesight. His only chance at seeing again is a new surgery using tissue from someone else's eyes and he gains new hope when his future father-in-law agrees to donate his eyes for the procedure when he dies. However, that hope quickly turns to despair when his would-be benefactor is murdered hours later and he becomes the primary suspect.
Movie Review: Dead Man's Eyes (1944)
by StevenHelmer
A review of the murder mystery starring Lon Chaney Jr. and Jean Parker.
Who's In It?
The movie stars Lon Chaney Jr., Jean Parker, Paul Kelly, Jonathan Hale and Acquanetta.
Review
My oldest daughter and I have a long list of classic movies on our "to watch" list. And, since she now has a break from figure skating and doesn't have to be at the ice rink 3-4 times per week, we've been using the extra free time to get caught up on them. This was the movie we picked out to watch last night.
This is a movie I thought looked interesting the first time I read the description. But, at the same time, I wasn't really sure what to expect from it. As it turns out, it was actually pretty good.
The thing I found I really like about this film was the mystery surrounding Stanley Hayden's (Edward Fielding) was actually pretty solid. A lot of times, in movies like this one, the killer is kind of obvious. In this movie, however, there are actually quite a few suspects with their own potential motives. And the only clue left at the crime scene was a small screw that could have been from anything and may not even had anything to do with the murder.
In fact, as the artist (Chaney Jr) began to act a little more suspicious throughout the film, I did start to wonder if there would be a surprise twist that made him the killer simply because, at least in other films I've seen, when there are a variety of equally-motivated suspects, a lot of times it ends up being someone else.
I think my only real complaint about this movie is the ending. This is because, while I was somewhat surprised by who the killer was (at that point, I was actually thinking it was a minor character, even though he had no motive), I thought that person ended up confessing and giving himself up a little too easily. At minimum, it would have been nice to at least see him attempt to escape. However, even though I wasn't a fan of the ending, the overall movie made up for it.
Inner Sanctum Mysteries: The Complete Movie Collection (Calling Dr. Death / Weird Woman / The Fro... Get ready for unlimited thrills and chills as all six of Universal's classic Inner Sanctum Mysteries come to DVD for the first time ever. You'll have a hauntingly good time with... |
Final Opinion
This is a halfway decent murder mystery that was fun to watch. I would recommend it if you're in the mood for a classic film.
My Grade: A
More By This Writer
Love Poems for My Wife When Steve first met Cynthia back in 2000, he knew she was the woman for him and proposed to her just three months after their first date. Married to her since 2003, he has ofte... | |
Angels Don't Always Have Wings: A Sinner's Poems of Faith Steve never thought of himself as an overly religious person and had rarely set foot inside of a church. However, after agreeing to attend a service following a visit to a churc... |
You might also like
Movie Review: Gaslight (1944)A review of the 1944 movie starring Ingrid Bergman and Charles Boyer.
Movie Review: The Pearl of Death (1944)A review of the 1944 Sherlock Holmes movie starring Basil Rathbone and Nigel ...
Movie Review: Laura (1944)A review of the film noir classic starring Gene Tierney and Dana Andrews.
Comments
StevenHelmer, It's a good classic film even though it unsettles me like The Man with the X-Ray Eyes.