Just like Inception, this is a movie where you have to pay attention. There are at least two concurrent story-lines occurring. I made it more.
You will possibly want more than one viewing, so you follow one or the other. There will be details that are only caught when you know what you're looking for.
However, it doesn't feel that confusing when you're watching it. It's only afterwards that kicks in. It's when you realize that the two people sitting either side of you saw two different movies; and neither was the one that you saw.
The meat of the movie concerns what happens when the Mafia get time travel. One mobster returned in time to recruit assassins. It was easy to do, as society is more than a little rough in 2042 America.
Anyone who crosses the mob in 2072 is zapped back in time. They barely have a second to draw breath before, handcuffed and hooded, they are shot dead by the waiting hit-men. Their murderers are the Loopers.
But one day that man being killed will be yourself. It's called 'closing the loop' and it's understood.
What is also understood are the consequences to not pulling that trigger, even against your older self. I think I will be having nightmares for a while at the implications of what happened to one young Looper.
Joe knows this. That is why, when his older self fights back, he is so determined to hunt him down and 'close the loop'. But there are complications, not least that the older Joe has had thirty years more experience at this game, and an agenda of his own.
There's a sub-plot too, just to make life even more interesting. A tenth of the population has evolved telekinesis. By the second act of the movie, it's like flicking between The Godfather and Carrie.
But again, and I can't reiterate this enough - it works!
Comments
I'm really looking forward to seeing that one too. I read your review of it. :) But yes, Looper seriously does feed and feed. I really need to watch it again.
I downloaded ths right after seeing your review (just the outside icon in the list on the front page)... I was astounded by this movie- the ending left too much to the imagination but the movie sure fed it didn't it? I watched it 3 times before it all sunk completely in (well 2 but the third was still awakening)... I can't wait now to see the next one in the inception/looper/awesometastic movies- by the wachowski brothers no doubt- CLOUD ATLAS! (I wrote a review myself on that one).
You're welcome and PLEASE come back to me when you have. It's taken over my mind! I want to chat with someone about it all. :)
Well, I look forward to this movie!:-) Thanks, Jo!
*smirks* Yeah. And I went to the pictures in the middle of it. Workaholics-R-Us.
four in one day Jo? Impressive!
Precisely! Nor would it have changed the story in any way if Cid had been a little girl, instead of a boy. So many ways around the Bechdel Test here!
You're right, some of the Loopers could have been female too.
Woot!!!!
Sorry, I've only got as far as you saying that there WERE plot-holes. That's back up for me in the debate with my nephew!
Time to read the rest of the comment.
Rian Johnson did say that he wanted the time travel element, in order to explore the psychology, rather than the science. His main inspiration was actually 'Witness'. But I could have made it more watertight. In fact, I bet that a million fan fiction writers will plug those plot holes with utter genius, in the coming years.
There were so many cast members. Some of them could have been female without any part of the plot being otherwise changed. You could argue that the Mob are traditionally female, but this is set in 2042 and 2072. One Mafia boss was revealed to be transsexual a few years ago. Give us another thirty years and the mob will be over-run with women.
I enjoyed Looper, but thought that it maybe wasn't as good as I was told it would be. However, I am happy to reconsider that after re-watching (will wait for DVD).
It is virtually impossible to have a time travel movie without plot holes. I believe Looper had some huge holes there, but I don't think it set out to be watertight in that department. In one scene one character says to another not to worry about the science. That was a bit clunky, but at least it made the movie's intentions clear.
Interesting thoughts on the Bechdel test. Maybe it can get extra credit for just how good the Emily Blunt character was and considering she didn't really talk with anyone out at the farm. Only her son and two visitors. Agree - the other two female characters were just phoned in plot devices.