Synopsis: Feeling her family is in a rut, Charlie Newton is thrilled to learn her mom's younger brother, Charlie (the man she was named after) is making a surprise visit. However, when Uncle Charlie arrives, he begins to act strangely. And, when two detectives also arrive, she begins to suspect her uncle is a wanted murderer.
Movie Review: Shadow of a Doubt (1943)
by StevenHelmer
A review of the 1943 Alfred Hitchcock thriller starring Teresa Wright and Joseph Cotten.
Who's In It?
The movie stars Teresa Wright, Joseph Cotten, Henry Travers, MacDonald Carey and Wallace Ford.
Review
I came across this film on one of our movie channels last night and, since I didn't have to go into work today, decided to record it so I could watch it at lunch. I have liked pretty much every Alfred Hitchcock movie I've ever watched and had high expectations about this one as a result. This movie more than lived up to those.
I think the thing I liked best about this movie was the mystery surrounding Uncle Charlie (Cotten). He was definitely acting suspiciously. But, being a Hitchcock film, I wasn't sure if he was really the killer or if he was hiding something completely different.
Not to mention, I wasn't really sure if he was really Charlie's (Wright) uncle or an impersonator. As the movie progressed, that became somewhat important, especially when she began pushing him. If he was really family, I wasn't sure if he would actually harm her if given the chance.
I was very impressed with the way the younger Charlie was written. As I've said in other reviews, I like movies with strong female leads and, as soon as Charlie became romantically interested in one of the detectives (Carey), I was afraid she'd end up playing second fiddle to him. However, she did an excellent job standing up for herself, even as she started to realize her life may be in danger, and that only added to the overall excitement.
I also loved how Hitchcock threw in some interesting supporting characters. Her father's (Newton) friend, Herbie (Hume Croyn), for example, was actually kind of creepy. The way he seemed to take so much joy in discussing ways to get away with murder did make me wonder, for a short while at least, if he would end up being the bad guy. I also found I had a hard time trusting the detectives because, after all, they were strangers to her town as well and could just as easily be lying about who they were.
Final Opinion
This is a great classic thriller that I genuinely enjoyed watching. I recommend taking the time to watch it if you have an opportunity to.
My Grade: A
More By This Writer
 | Love Poems for My Wife When Steve first met Cynthia back in 2000, he knew she was the woman for him and proposed to her just three months after their first date.Married to her since 2003, he has often... |
 | Angels Don't Always Have Wings Steve never thought of himself as an overly religious person and had rarely set foot inside of a church. However, after agreeing to attend a service following a visit to a churc... |
Updated: 02/19/2018, StevenHelmer
You might also like
Movie Review: Sherlock Holmes Faces Death (1943)A review of the 1943 murder mystery starring Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce.
Movie Review: Sahara (1943)A review of the 1943 war movie starring Humphrey Bogart and Lloyd Bridges.
Movie Review: Captive Wild Woman (1943)A review of the 1943 science fiction film starring John Carradine and Acquane...
Disclosure: This page generates income for authors based on affiliate relationships with our partners, including Amazon, Google and others.
Movie Review: Exiled (1998)on 01/23/2021
Law & Order: Special Victims Unit Episode Review: The Long Arm of the Witnesson 01/22/2021
Review of Walker Pilot Episodeon 01/22/2021
Review of Luige's Western Omelette Pizzaon 01/21/2021
Comments
StevenHelmer, Thank you for product lines, pretty pictures and practical information.
The library system here has this film among its DVD collections. I've seen it. Your review is helpfully interesting. It makes me intend to re-see the film since I hadn't considered the possibility (which wasn't the reality, but it's always helpful to consider all scenarios) of the detectives being other than they said. It'll be interesting to see what else I missed fhe first time around.
How would this fare as a re-make in color?