Every day each player gets two opportunities to win on Squeal of Fortune. This is free of charge.
It's a very prominent mini-game, with the access module placed on the screen as soon as the player logs in. They either play it or dismiss it. With nothing to lose and everything to gain, the majority of players will click that button.
Once inside, the wheel spins and the goblin bounces up and down on his chain. Pressing the big, red button causes a large boxing glove to smash into him. He screams and flies left across the screen. The animation causes the wheel to stop.
Wherever it lands relates to a prize (redeemable only inside the game) from the selection below. Those in the red boxes are the most desirable.
For example, if I was playing in the illustrated game, I'd have my eye on the Godsword (third from the left) or the massive XP lamp in the middle.
It's far more likely that the counter will stop on a white or gold box. That's disappointing. I could have had a Godsword, but now I have two pieces of clay.
But there's now another option. Up the corner there's a green button, inviting me to buy spins. It's very easy. One click and I have another 10 spins, or 25, or 75. Surely there's a Godsword amongst all of those!
Even more enticingly, some observers have already worked out the exact moment to press, in order to gain the item that you want. It's a counting game coupled with the speed and skill of a twitch player.
That takes away the element of luck. A player could become extremely well kitted out, or gain untold skill levels, employing that strategy. All that's needed are more spins on the Squeal of Fortune.
Comments
There are people getting 99s on SoF alone. They can legitimately buy their XP.
That was damaging enough, but it's the whole ripple effect which has torn this game apart. One of my friends went through and counted all of the updates this year. The overwhelming majority were about SoF or Solomon's Store, with very little going on in terms of game content.
I didn't log on for over a month. I popped back in to find that I had XP lamps worth over a million in my inventory. I got that for doing nothing.
So many of my friends have cancelled their subscriptions and just left now. It has been in protest over all of the microtransactions and other game-breaking developments. Those who remained are currently raging about EoC. In context SoF was just the very damaging beginning of it.
SOF really isn't to bad if I was to spin 10,000 times it wouldn't even give me a 10% boost to my total exp. It's still practically all traditional training is the way to go unless your willing to spend 10s of thousands on a video game which I really doubt anyone in there right mind is doing. The occasional person why buys even a large spin package will see little to no benefit in comparison to there total exp.
Great find! Thank you very much, Cathy, and please keep them coming. I'm seeing a lot of forum posts shut down for discussing things like this. I'm MORE than happy to collate that information here.
That is a massive U-turn by Mark Gerhard!
"Former Jagex CEO Geoff Iddison said that he wanted to merge the premium subscription model with micropayments. How do you feel about the idea?
I don’t think you can take a game like Runescape and retrofit microtransactions into it. The game’s just too big, and I don’t think it would add value for our players. Obviously that system could be more remunerative, but I think it would price a player experience too far up."
Source: http://www.runeplanet.com/forum/index...
So who's responsible when the CEO of the entire company thinks it's a bad idea?
Thank you for that very extensive apprisal of the legal situation. I know that you certainly know what you're talking about, as this is a field of some expertise for you.
You're also not alone in your assessment. The RSOF last night had people on both sides of the Atlantic coming up with the same conclusions. One lady was sitting with a lawyer specialising in gambling issues. He relayed the fact that there was a legal case here, particularly because minors are involved.
That was a valuable comment. Thank you for adding it.
There are 2 issues here. Firstly is the emotional one about micropayments, but more seriously there is also the issue of encouraging children to gamble. The first is just an unpleasant decision by a company trying to maximise profits, but the second potentially has much bigger consequences. My first move was to contact the MP for Cambridge (Julian Huppert, a Liberal Democrat and interent rights campaigner who I've talked to on twitter in the past) and let him know that there's a potential problem on his patch.
Secondly, I've been looking into the legal side of the gambling element. It seems Jagex have found a loophole to avoid this being classed as a lottery. Because players are given one or two free 'spins', this is not technically a paid lottery, even though youngsters are being encouraged to buy additional 'spins'. I've spoken to the Gaming Commission, and they believe this does not require a licence, and isn't covered by their rules, but they note that they only regulate legal gambling.
Because the gambling game is advertised to children, it is definitely in breach of the rules of the Advertising Standards Authority, and I have reported Jagex's in-game advertising to them, as it exploits the gullability of minors, misrepresents the chances of winning (the size of the red portions of the wheel are vastly exaggerated) and because it risks gambling debts and gambling addiction, it (and this is a yukky phrase) "endangers their morals".
If this move doesn't get anywhere, there is always the possibility of getting the police involved. Because it does not fall under the lottery exemption, it looks very much like Jagex are committing an offence under Section 46(1) of the Gambling Act 2005: "A person commits an offence if he invites, causes or permits a child or young person to gamble." (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2...). Their 'but you always win something, even if it's worthless so it's not gambling' line of reasoning might hold some sway on forums, but it's highly unlikely to stand up in a court of law.
I for one would be cheering on anyone who made a formal complaint to the police on this matter.