Star Trek Episode Review: Court Martial (1967)

by StevenHelmer

A review of the Star Trek episode that first aired February 2, 1967.

Synopsis: The Enterprise docks at a starbase for repairs following an encounter with an ion storm and Kirk (William Shatner) faces a court martial for ejecting a research pod and causing the apparent death of one of his crew members. Kirk maintains his actions were necessary. However, computer records of the event show him pushing the eject button prematurely, putting his career in jeopardy.

Review

The weather hasn't been cooperating with me so I wound up going home for lunch yesterday rather than going out for a walk. While there, I decided to finish up this episode. 

At first, I wasn't really sure how this episode would differ from a previous episode, The Menagerie, other than it being Kirk on trial rather than Spock (Leonard Nimoy). However, I wound up being very impressed with it.

OK, I'll start out by saying there were actually a couple things I didn't like. The first is I'm still a little confused about what this "research pod" was, why it needed to be ejected to save the ship and why it needed a live person inside of it. I'm sure there's some sort of Star Trek literature that explains it further, but it would have been nice if the episode would have taken the time to explain it.

Not to mention, what the heck was up with that eject button? Given the potential consequences of pushing it, you would think it would be located in a spot that wouldn't make it easy to push by accident (as the evidence against Kirk seemed to indicate). That is a major design flaw in my opinion.

That being said, I still thought this was a decent episode, mostly because of the mystery. Because it was Kirk on trial, I was confident he was telling the truth when he said he followed procedure. But, the evidence him was definitely damning, both because of the computer footage showing him push the button early and because he had a history with the crew member, Finney (Richard Webb) that, at least depending on your imagination (I personally thought the logic was a bit of a stretch) could have been motive for Kirk to push the button out of malice.

I am still a little undecided about Kirk's defense attorney, Samuel T. Cogley (Elisha Cook, Jr.). This is because I kind of liked him but, at the same time, felt as though the episode didn't do a great job developing him. In other words, I liked his anti-technology stance. I just wish the writers would have given us a little more background about why he was so anti-technology to begin with.

Final Opinion

I didn't like everything about this episode. But, I did like the mystery and, overall, thought it was interesting. I would recommend it as a result.

My Grade: B

More By This Writer

Love Poems for My Wife

When Steve first met Cynthia back in 2000, he knew she was the woman for him and proposed to her just three months after their first date.Married to her since 2003, he has often...

View on Amazon

Does God Cry?

Internationally-selling poet and children's book author Steven Helmer presents his third book of spiritual poetry meant to inspire you to keep God's love in your heart.

View on Amazon

Updated: 05/21/2019, StevenHelmer
 
Thank you! Would you like to post a comment now?
2

Comments

Only logged-in users are allowed to comment. Login

You might also like

Star Trek Episode Review: Arena (1967)

A review of the television episode that first aired January 19, 1967,

Movie Review: Star Trek: Beyond (2016)

A review of the 2016 science fiction movie starring Chris Pine and Idris Elba.

Star Trek: The Next Generation Episode Review: Where No One Ha...

A review of the season 1 television episode that first aired October 1987.


Disclosure: This page generates income for authors based on affiliate relationships with our partners, including Amazon, Google and others.
Loading ...
Error!