Margaret Willes has several gardening books to her credit, and this one must have taken much time and commitment. It is a comprehensive tome that investigates the allotments, potato plots and cottage gardens of the working class in Britain over several centuries. It is not merely a book about plants, but about the politics and economics of gardening and its role in the lives of working class people. As such it is a work of social history intended to complement works that emphasise the role of large gardens and the famous designers. Willes does deal with some famous gardeners, such as Joseph Paxton, who was a working class man who rose to eminence and riches through grasp of his trade, but mainly she speaks of the ordinary folk.
This book has changed my view of the agricultural revolution and alerted me to the often neglected leadership role played by working class gardeners in the process. At school I studied Social and Economic History, and I took from it the idea that farmers, such as Townsend, led the process of agricultural development that fed the burgeoning British population. Willes shows that gardeners were vital in the process of development. We are told that Townsend invented crop rotation, but gardeners had been doing it for years.
We are also informed of the negative role played by some landowners in the development of allotments, and how they tried to squash the opportunities for working class people to produce their own food. This was, of course, to ensure that they would ahve a monopoly on food production. Yet we are also shown the role of horticultural pioneers, enlightened landownerswho provided plots for the people. We learn of self-help movements in which working class people, inpsired by the memory of the Diggers, tried to develop co-operative plots.




Comments
frankbeswickApr 5, 2024
DerdriuMarrinerApr 5, 2024
A Dig for Victory Unitedstatesian equivalent nowadays might involve government employees noticing particularly economical, efficacious farming and plant-growing.
Might there have been some attention on that order for the Dig for Victory campaign or might strained budgets and people and resources have precluded such attention?
Or might there have been some investigation, research or study postwar to note why some Victory diggers were less or more successful than, or successfully the same as, others?
frankbeswickApr 5, 2024
DerdriuMarrinerApr 5, 2024
A Unitedstatesian counterpart might tend toward required classes, required certification, required inspections.
That arrangement seems cost-, personnel-, resource-intensive for wartime efforts even as it tends toward such a configuration nowadays, for instance in organic farming.
Would the government advice have been a recommendation or a requirement in the Dig for Victory campaign?
frankbeswickApr 5, 2024
DerdriuMarrinerApr 4, 2024
Might the British government have offered planting, irrigating, fertilizing guidelines and standards?
Or were the working-class gardeners working their gardens their way?
frankbeswickMar 10, 2023
DerdriuMarrinerMar 9, 2023
Would your grandfather by chance have written about his wartime experiences and about that post-service experience?
frankbeswickMar 9, 2023
frankbeswickMar 9, 2023
Interestingly, my grandfather once had to use a soup kitchen. He arrived in London after World War One with just the clothes he was wearing, a travel pass home and six pence in h.is pocket. Having missed the last train home he looked for a doorway to sleep in, then he saw a Salvation Army soup kitchen. The staff refused his offer of money and gave him a small meal. The payment they asked for was for him to go away and do for another person what had been done for him.
DerdriuMarrinerMar 8, 2023
The book Jack London: Novels and Social Writings, published as Library of America series book 7 and distributed by Penguin Random House, contains People of the Abyss.
People of the Abyss describes his experience renting a nice house in a nice neighborhood, from which he regularly emerged, dirty-looking and shabbily dressed, to experience -- in what he sarcastically called "merry old England" -- poverty in declining and poor neighborhoods of London.
London indicated that families still living in houses -- be they owned or rented -- or squatting in abandoned or irregularly inhabited houses may have shared edibles and growables with the homeless and the poor in their neighborhoods.
London mentioned areas of London as having the equivalent of shelters and soup kitchens. He said that the shelters only accepted 25 people for an overnight stay from mid-afternoon to mid-afternoon. He stated that the shelters and the soup kitchens were staggered at 10-mile (16.09-kilometer) intervals from one another.
I often wonder why he did not write about American experiences of socioeconomic depression from the Industrial Revolution and during World War I (during which he died on his ranch).
Would Jack London's name and writings be known on your, eastern side of the (Atlantic) Ocean?
frankbeswickMar 8, 2023
DerdriuMarrinerMar 8, 2023
How did and do poor and working-class people get seeds for their gardens? I imagine them collecting seeds from their insufficient purchases at farmers' markets and grocery stores, picking up every seed that they see and sharing seeds.
The seed-sharing is inspired by reading People of the Abyss by Jack London. That experience made me think that families going down socioeconomically but still living in, or squatting at, houses with yards may have grown food and shared edibles and seeds with those even less fortunate, such as the homeless who weren't among the 25 (day-admitted, next day-expelled) into shelters spaced at 10-mile (16.09-kilometer) intervals.
DerdriuMarrinerSep 26, 2014
Thank you for spotlighting these books.
WriterArtistMay 24, 2014
frankbeswickApr 30, 2014
frankbeswickApr 29, 2014
ologsinquitoApr 29, 2014
KathleenDuffyApr 29, 2014