Was Tolkien Racist?

Tolkien was an expert on philology, the study of sounds, and he studied this subject partly through the medium of myths. His study encompassed the myths of many nations, though he concentrated upon the myths of the European peoples. The Finnish myth of the Kalevala fascinated him. He delved deeply into Celtic myth, a delving that was reflected in the Silmarillion's recounting of the westward journey of the elves over the ice, which was drawn from the Irish myth of the coming of the Tuatha de Danaan from the West; and he pored long over Germanic myths. Tolkien shared with Jung a belief that myths were vehicles by which great truths of human life were expressed, and this means that they are culturally,morally and religiously important.Tolkien would never say "only a myth."

This is one of the reasons for his hatred of Naziism. Tolkien detested the works of Wagner, Hitler's musical hero, because of his corruption of Nordic mythology. He saw the dangers inherent in the corruption. For this reason, along with many other, he despised the poisonous rantings of Hitler, who used Wagner's twisted mythology to support his demonic cause. Therefore,the claim made by  Andy Duncan in A Geeks' Guide to the Galaxy podcast [reported in The Times by Will Humphries] that Tolkien's heroes are all white and western and that therefore there is a degree of racism in his work must be taken in a qualified way and set against his general opposition to Naziism and its racist philosophy. Humphries informs us that in 1938 Tolkien refused a request from his German publisher to confirm his Aryan descent. This is not the action of a racist. 

In fact, Tolkien's heroes, the hobbits, are subtly anti-Nazi. Naziism elevated the Aryan race over all other races, classing Aryans as Herrenvolk, noble people, promoting a belief in the superiority of Aryan blood. Aryans were classed as tall,fair skinned people with fair hair that hung limply without curls, and their body hair was quire sparse, unlike the darker skinned Latin races, who were thought to be hirsuit.  Compare this to the hobbits, who are described in chapter 1 of The Hobbit as  having brown curly hair, hairy feet [there, the body hair!] and brown fingers. The implication is that the hobbits were brown skinned.Unlike the supposed warrior Aryans, who were tall, hobbits are merely three feet tall and prefer avoiding trouble to fighting. It should be clear that Tolkien is in his work challenging racial stereotypes with  a slightly comic alternative; and we can see that Andy Duncan's claim that Tolkien's heroes are all white immediately fails. 

Furthermore, the Lord of the Rings is anti-Wagner, whose Nibelung saga is about the heroic quest to find a ring of power. The two hobbits, Frodo and Sam, are involved in a far greater heroic quest to destroy the ring of power. This ring magnifies the will of the one who wears it, but corrupts in the process. In telling of the destruction of this ultimate weapon, which is of diabolical origin, Tolkien is demonstrating a hostility to the Nazi cult of the will. We can sense in the book Tolkien's revulsion at the infamous Nazi propaganda film, The Triumph of the Will, produced by Hitler's film maker Leni Riefenstahl.   

It is clear that the claims of racism are in these areas unfounded. 

Duncan's case is made on the basis of a letter written by Tolkien in the nineteen fifties, which describes the orcs as slant eyed. They are seen to be like the oriental races, but this claim is overstated. The orcs were never human, for the Silmarillion tells us that Morgoth, the first Dark Lord, bred them from captured elves.  His evil caused him to breed an ugly and clumsy species, into which he bred a fierce loyalty to himself. The orcs in Tolkien are enemies of the good and also victims of evil. The elves were a malleable folk, whose nature was capable of unlimited corruption, whereas in Tolkien's view humans were not, so there were no orcs derived from human stock.Thus the orcs are not oriental races or even cave folk. 

Yet one of Tolkien's ideas is oft-overlooked. Evil  produces distortion and ugliness. The dark speech of Mordor is grating and ugly, whereas elven tongues produce music and poetry . The prophecy given to the Witch King of Angmar, leader of the Nazgul, that not by the hand of mortal man will he be slain, proves askew, as he is slain by a woman, Eowyn is a character who shows that Tolkien is  not afraid of strong female characters. Morgoth's evil character, despite is high powers, cannot produce beauty, but always something twisted and unattractive. Tolkien,  a devout Roman Catholic, believed in  the existence of a moral order in the world that orientated it towards God and thought that without divine orientation no good would come, thus for Tolkien Morgoth's attempt at a creation autonomous of the deity, Illuvator, was doomed to be skewed and malformed. 

Tolkien, devoutly Catholic, would never have regarded any members of the human species as th products of an evil power, for this would fly in the face of Catholic teaching. The church does not accept that any race is superior to another. 

One of the claims that Tolkien was racist rests upon the claim that his heroes are white. Well, they are in the films, but the books are unspecific about the heroes' colour and as we have seen hobbits are brown. But the story is set in the west of a large continent at whose centre lies a totalitarian dictatorship behind a curtain of mountains. It is easy to see the Soviet Union here. The  heroes' lands are plainly Western Europe.  There are definitely identifiable races in The Lord of the Rings.The Rohirrim are idealised, horse riding Anglo-Saxons,hence white. However, political correctness is   plague upon literary criticism and culture in general, so no useful purpose is served  by speaking of the whiteness of the heroes. 

Yet the Times article implies that  Tolkien implies that some races are more prone to good than others are. But no Roman Catholic or Christian could say this, for the flaw of original sin affects all nations equally,so Tolkien could not be implying it.

Moreover, we find in Tolkien that members of the hero races can go wrong, as can members of the archangelic and angelic orders of the Valar and the Maia. The Silmarillion narrates the tale of how the noble Numenoreans, once friends of the Valar, became corrupt under the influence of the demonic Sauron, leading to their destruction, with only a remnant remaining to return to the lands of  Middle Earth. The Return of the King  tells us that there even Dark Numenoreans who took the side of Sauron, the Dark Lord. The Witch King of Angmar was of Numenorean stock corrupted by Sauron. So much for the idea that Tolkien thought some races better than others.

Up to the nineteen sixties people still thought in racial terms. I can recall reading at that time  in a school textbook that the European population could be divided into the Nordic, Alpine and Mediterranean races. I wondered why my wonderful and enlightened History and Geography teacher never used that chapter. Now I know. He knew that what it said was bunkum. Tolkien would have had some concept of race, but it is not significant in his  works. He is definitely not a racist.