Following the Cynthia incident, Ed and Lorraine Warren were shaken into re-evaluating what they were doing here. Fascination and information building were honorable pursuits, but not when people could be hurt.
That was the thing - until now ghosts had been something other. They weren't thinking, feeling individuals. A major point had been missed, which was these were actually human beings. They'd just shifted form. They had consciously survived their own death.
The Warrens, and the New England Society for Psychic Research, had been acting like tourists in other people's tragedies. They'd been ignoring cries for help, because they hadn't recognized them as such.
Ed began a frenzy of meetings and telephone calls. He started from the viewpoint of 'who could I call for help in these situations?' Then went for it.
Hours of conversations with priests and theologians ensued, alongside discussions with those who may have aided these people, if they were alive. Psychologists, social workers, police officers, all the emergency back-up for those in distress.
Armed with reams of knowledge and advice, the Warrens now shifted their focus. They were there to help, not as voyeurs, but as a kind of paranormal social service.
Moreover, Ed had been warned by Catholic priests that not every haunting was the benign remnant of a human in distress. Some of them were much worse. They were demonic in origin, either due to occult activities taking place on the site or a direct approach by some Hellish force.
As the decades passed, and the couple's experience grew, they were to encounter cases like this. Ed Warren trained as a demonologist, in order to deal with them, though the couple always deferred to the Church in perceived worst case scenarios.
One criticism of the Warrens is that they became quicker to reach conclusions involving a demonic entity over a bog-standard haunting. It was thought that their own strict Catholicism meant that they lost objectivity here.
Or it could have been lots of demons in modern day America.
Comments
Hear, hear!
That's the problem here. Scientific methodology is just left at the door, in the name of dismissing something as not scientific. I much prefer Bryan Sykes's approach to the Bigfoot stories. He actually tested the DNA on hair samples and gave us hard evidence. Ok, that evidence didn't prove Bigfoot, but it was hard evidence.
The problem is that the paranormal is something of a dustbin category, into which the intellectual establshment throws any phenomenon that it cannot explain. But the opposite side of this dismissal is that you cannot dismiss the whole category by dismissing one kind of phenomenon. Even more significant is that despite what the conventional thinkers say, the paranormal is part of many people's experience, and so it cannot be wished, sneered or talked away.
Yep, though there are plenty of people who say that the Lutz family made it up, or were mad, or were... *insert any other alternative leveled by people who couldn't countenance the possibility of real paranormal activity*
This was really interesting. I wasn't aware the Amityville horrors were based on a true story.
Thank you very much, Frank.
Thank you too for your defense of my mental faculties. I've deleted the original comment, from Talhareman, because it didn't look like an argument to me. Just spam for the psychiatrist.
If that was unfair, Talhareman, then please do respond more fully. I would be happy to debate this issue with you.
This was yet another interesting article, Jo. Informative indeed.
Talhareman, why did you suggest that Jo gets a healthy mind? She and I have communicated over the last few months and, from our communications, I am convinced that she is intelligent, well educated and totally sane.