Whidden and Carroll maintained the truth of their story, even when public opinion later shifted away from a supernatural origin for the phenomena.
There's little doubt that Harold Whidden arrived primarily for the story. The popularity of his earlier article had ensured his return. No shame was attached to that. It was his job.
But he emerged from the MacDonald Homestead as a believer. So shaken, that he was willing to finance, from his own pocket, a $100 reward for anyone who could successfully explain what he had experienced there.
Alongside him, Detective Carroll (pictured) probably had more to lose, in terms of his reputation, by opting for a supernatural explanation.
But he also declared his belief that a ghost was in the homestead.
The pair arrived in Caledonia Mills in early February. Making contact with the McGillivrays again, they were introduced to the MacDonald family. It was agreed that seventy-year-old Alex MacDonald would accompany them to his home. He stayed with them for as long as they kept the vigil.
Initially the idea was to be there for three days and nights. It actually turned into two.
The MacDonald Homestead was icy cold. Fire damage had gutted much of the furnishings and rendered the range unusable. Whidden, MacDonald and Carroll instead piled on layers of clothing and survived the frozen winter conditions that way.
It wasn't until the second night that anything strange occurred. Whidden told how he was sitting in a chair, with Carroll occupying a second chair to his left. Farmer MacDonald merely lay on the floor. The laws of Gaelic hospitality saw him refusing anything else.
Above their heads came 'strange sounds', which neither Carroll nor Whidden could place. The noises were quickly joined by footsteps, as if someone was pacing in the bedchamber.
The two men waited, listening in the full knowledge that nobody was up there. The homestead was deserted but for the trio in the living room. A glance at MacDonald showed that he'd fallen asleep.
All was quiet, when Whidden felt the blow. It seemed like something had punched him hard in the left forearm. Startled, he stared at Carroll, who had not budged an inch. The detective appeared perplexed at phenomena of his own. Something had apparently just pulled at his own left arm.
The sensations felt by both men were strong enough to have cut through (in Whidden's case) 'two shirts, an inside coat, a heavy sweater, a fur-lined overcoat and a new horse-rug'.
Whidden woke Alex MacDonald and asked the farmer if he'd hit him. MacDonald was naturally confused. He'd been asleep.
Whidden knew this. He would have seen the farmer the second that he stirred, as the old man wasn't far away. The reporter stated that he had to ask for the sake of exhausting all reasonable possibilities. But they all knew it wasn't that. Low level panic was galvanizing his tongue into asking ridiculous questions.
For the next 'fifteen to twenty minutes', Whidden became convinced that a 'strange presence' was in the house. He sat tense and expectant, waiting for it to show itself or for the violence to escalate.
It was there! It was watching them! It was with them! But after the aforementioned time had passed, it was like a switch had been flicked on Whidden's sensibilities. He no longer felt that the entity was there. Finally he could relax.
Neither MacDonald nor Carroll experienced that tingling anticipation at all. Weeks later, a paranormal investigator would test Whidden's psychic ability, and find it stronger than most.
Comments
George D. WrightOct 4, 2017
JoHarringtonNov 3, 2013
frankbeswickNov 3, 2013
JoHarringtonNov 3, 2013
I agree with your assessment of Prince and his ilk. He arrived with a theory, which he set out to prove. When that was untenable, he changed his theory and looked for evidence of that instead. That's not science. Science looks at the evidence, THEN arrives at a conclusion, if possible.
JoHarringtonNov 3, 2013
I like your thinking about gas. There wasn't any in the house, nor electricity, as everything was done via the range. But what if the gas was natural? Coming out of the ground.
frankbeswickNov 3, 2013
Debunkers set opinion as facts, for example that the girl set the fire, as I noted in the previous paragraph. Then they belittle witnesses who have observed realities that their limited and superficial world view cannot understand. This technique is applied consistently through the whole range of embarassing phenomena and then dishonestly trumpeted as a scientific explanation. Prince's technique degenerates by having to write off the testimony of those who disagree with him as lies, which adds to its intellectual discreditability.
Sadly this sort of pseudo-scientific drivel is common in academia.
The key point here is that there is a difference between explaining and explaining away; the former is epistemologically credible, the latter is not. A genuine phenomenological approach is to address the phenomena with an open mind without prejudice, which is what Prince did not do. It is wonderful to know that acadamics nowadays wouold appoach situations like this with an open mind!
GuestNov 2, 2013
JoHarringtonOct 30, 2013
PaulOct 30, 2013
JoHarringtonOct 23, 2013
Mary Ellen wasn't always there when the fires kicked off, which suggests that it wasn't always her.
EmberOct 23, 2013
This whole story was so creepy just because it sounds so much like a scary story that you'd read or something...but it's real!