Human rights cover a broad spectrum of articles, which can be grouped into three categories: the right to life and political participation; the right to economic, social and cultural equality; and the right to peace and a clean environment.
Each enshrined part has sustained frequent attack, in even the most apparently enlightened nations; and the last is the most contested of all.
Many of us persist in the childlike belief that our government has our best interests at heart. They don't. They have the whole nation's best interest at heart. There's a subtle difference.
It means, for example, that an individual perceived as a troublemaker could quietly disappear, if a case could be made for that being for the good of the country. Human rights are what makes this more difficult.
Yet it is naive to think that these rights are welcomed with open arms by those wielding power. No matter what the ideals and principles of a politician, at the back of their minds has to be the notion that governance would be so much easier without interference from their populace. For a start, they wouldn't have to stop half-way through making headway in order to concentrate on winning the next election.
A country's economic growth flourishes under slavery, the absolute monopoly of markets, and the freedom for one nation to help itself to resources, all over the world and without charge, while ignoring the people who actually live there.
The military pipe dream would be to own, in vast quantities, the most destructive arsenal on the planet. World domination is the true ideal, but failing that, then having every other nation so afraid that they don't resist a thing will suffice. Being perceived as too impregnable to attack is fantastic; alternatively, it would work if the rest of the world's population was too fearful of the consequences to even contemplate aggression.
That's wealth, sustenance and security covered. As for home-grown dissent, the freedom to round people up off the streets, and shove them into concentration camps, has proven effective. Anyone could go in there, without trial - criminals, undesirables, people who looked at you funny. It would soon remove the problem. The weak and otherwise useless would face certain death. The rest could be slaves or act as human test subjects in medical experiments.
The major thing stopping any government from attempting all of this is the concept and actuality of human rights. They are what makes us valuable as individuals.
Comments
Frank - Those examples are back to people attempt to water down our human rights. As long as your country signed that declaration, then your government (and everyone else) should be bound by it. It's a sad indictment when they aren't.
cmoneyspinner - Yet governments all over the world seem intent on watering down those human rights. It's our job to see to it that they don't succeed.
I agree. It is important, though to emphasise the concept of natural rights as opposed to civil rights. Natural rights are those rights embedded in human nature, a reflection of our shared personhood. Not everyone agrees with them, some believing that rights are granted by society [utilitarians for instance.] These people believe in civil rights, probably just as strongly as believers in natural rights, but they have not the secure foundation that natural rights provide.
What I really detest those people who try to redefine freedom as obedience to them. I heard one left wing extremist once say that freedom is obeying good laws, made by him of course. Another declared that he believed in positive liberty as opposed to negative [in layman's language, he believed that freedom was obeying him and his mates as opposed to what more mortals think it is.]
We all what our human rights are and we especially know when they're being violated.
If we trust and wholly rely on "authorities" to define and defend them, this world will be filled with miserable people!
So I noticed with all of the comments! Thank you very much for reading them. <3
And I'm glad that they were informative.
Just got to the end of all your human rights and death penalty articles. Well written and good information there, Jo. Keep up the good work.
Sorry, 'not all the time' what? (1.10am here, mind a mush.)
I agree that the importance of human rights can never be over-stated, as your country knows more keenly than most.
Thank you for your kind words. :)
It is very important we all learn those rights, because they are there for us. And we have to fight for those rights. Thank you for this article. All of us can learn a lot of stuff reading your article. Very informative and well written!
You're very welcome. Thank you very much for reading it and taking the time to comment. <3