What Can Australians Do About the Current Political Situation?

Pauline Hanson is an Australian politician and former leader of One Nation.  This was a right-wing populist, conservative and anti-multiculturalism platform. In 2006, she was named by The Bulletin as one of the 100 most influential Australians of all time.  

Hanson started her career in the city near where I grew up called Ipswich.  She was elected councillor in the mid-1990s. Fame came for her when she gave her maiden parliamentary speech in which she criticised immigration and multiculturalism.  She wanted to stop government assistance to Aboriginals and political correctness.  Her approach to solving economic woes was a return to high-tariff protectionism.  She lost her seat at the 1998 election. (Wikipedia 2014)

Pauline Hanson became incredibly popular in Australia because she was able to tap the fear that Australians have "That "THEY" will take our jobs."

'They' are anyone who is perceived to either get an 'unfair advantage' such as immigrants, refugees or other groups that have government protection or financially backed programs to help them 'step up into Australian society' and level the playing field.  

In her day, Ms Hanson wasn't as big a threat to Australia as Tony Abbot, because she didn't have the smarts to pull off the heist and because she was a woman.  Any woman daring to do politics in Australia falls fowl of misogyny.  Her biggest most unforgettable crime within the Australian political arena was to ask an interviewer to explain something to her.  She was then ridiculed and mimicked and demeaned right out the door.

Pauline Hanson was just a catalyst.  She brought to the surface everything that is ugly about Australian society.  It would have been nice if this experience had been like lancing a psychological boil.   Instead it showed just how frightened the Australian population is of competition and 'otherness'.  Once unscrupulous politicians picked up on this psychological vulnerability, Australia as a nation had no hope.  (That's why we are called "No Hopers").

In August 2001, the Howard Government of Australia refused permission for the Norwegian freighter MV Tampa, carrying 438 rescued refugees to enter Australian waters.  Watch this movie created by Margo O'Neil of the ABC.

In response to the feelings that Pauline Hanson showed were fuelling passion in Australia, the government of the day created refugee detention centres.  Anyone Australian who still knew how to think was embarrassed by the Tampa Affair. 

Damien Smith has shown why we should be concerned in article called Give Me Liberty.  

Simon Bolivar once said

Flee the country where a lone man holds all power: It is a nation of slaves.

I will leave it up to you to read Smith's 2014 article and only dot point the attributes identified by Dr Lawrence Britt in 2003 that indicate a Fascist Dictatorship.

1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism
2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights
3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
4. Supremacy of the Military
5. Rampant Sexism
6. Controlled Mass Media
7. Obsession with National Security
8. Religion and Government are Intertwined
9. Corporate Power is Protected
10. Labor Power is Suppressed 
11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts 
12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment 
13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
14. Fraudulent Elections

For those who would like to do something, the rest of this essay is about strategies we can all embrace in our own way and within our own budgets and timeframes.

Getting back to Fargy and his idea that this might all just "Blow Over" if we wait for the next 'Ill Wind That Blows No Good'.   

In an article called An American Owns Australia Fargey talks about how the media and big business pull strings in elections. 

"Just a friendly chat at a fund-raising dinner held by Gina Reinhardt, a mining heiress in Australia.  But the picture tells a real story.  The man kneeling is Tony Abbot, just before his election to Prime Minister of Australia".

Notice that this all happened at a fund-raising dinner held by Gina Reinhardt, a mining heiress.  Can you guess who the other chappy is?  (Better read the article)

Whether you agree with Fargy or not, my first suggestion is that you become financially educated.

Suggestion Number 1

I suggest you read The Unfair Advantage.  (Especially Unfair Advantage Chapter 4/ Risk.) You may or may not agree with the messages in its pages, but at least by understanding how the mining companies and the Government work in tandem, you will be able to see why I call for the Australian Green party to unhook refugee issues and mining.  They are separate issues.  Mining is about money and power but the situation with refugees - that is about human rights and civil liberty. Refugee resettlement should be funded by projects, which help the refugees earn money from outside the country so that they are bringing their own funding into the country along with their gifts, talents, insights and integrity.  What the Greens need to show us, the voters of Australia, is that they can run the country without any need to rely on mining at all. The more they rely on mining for funding, the less likely they are to be able to stop mining. Think of gambling as an analogy, the government so depends on gambling for revenue that they are prepared to allow it to continue no matter what the harm, no matter what the damage to people who suffer from addiction.  It does not help matters to bring these issues of financial co-dependency into arguments about human rights.   The two separate issues need 'unhooking'.

Relational Aesthetics is a much criticised art movement that creates its own platform from relationships forged through participation in the act of artistic creation. Within the context of the relational artistic acts, writers who talk about the art movement 'wrap themselves up' in what can be called 'linkages'.  (Let's just called them connections and presume for argument sake that social media is good for making the kinds of connections needed to be useful in any fight for justice).

Truthfully, these artistic ideas began back when John Lennon and Yoko Ono (and others) started appealing to our sense of 'global' self preservation.  From the very first instance Performance Art was about consciousness and consciousness raising. Yoko Ono's Communication Art and Performing the Other were a little more honestly named and a lot less pretentious than modern versions of Relational Art as described by Nicolas Bourriaud.  Modern Relational Art cracks at the seams for the reasons described by Zygmunt Bauman.  The artists are more concerned with establishing themselves as artists than they are about doing art or about relating.  This accounts for the hollow feeling people describe when they talk about this kind of art. (It is hollow and shallow.)

If you listen to John Lennon singing Give Peace a Chance, what he is really saying is that we could have peace tomorrow if we really wanted it - but - each and everyone of us has too much invested in the system to "REALLY WANT IT!"

At it's very deepest level, Art exists in society to show us those aspects of society that have been glossed over or suppressed to maintain the status quo. This is why the suggestions I am making in this article are very small and simple acts.  They are designed to help us keep the 'end goal' in view as we work together to clear our minds in an attempt to come to terms with the problem of growing Fascist ideology in Australia.

Here is my third concrete and tangible suggestion. 

Suggestion Number 3

What if each and everyone of us find just one image of a refugee who we believe has contributed to Australia by making the country a better place to live. 

It might be a person in your street who has settled well and is now contributing to society, or it could be someone as famous as Mao's Last Dancer. What if each and everyone of us created a portrait of that person 60cms by 60cms, and on one chosen day the entire country carried that portrait held high through the streets of their own home town. (Don't forget to get footage).  Schools could do this.  Community Centres could do this.  Political parties such as the Greens would surely support this.  The list goes on. Once the peaceful march was finished, the portrait be it painting, photo or sculpture could be hung outside buildings to act as a permanent reminder that this is one big global nation and everyone is welcome.  

I am working with a team to create products around an idea to integrate phonetics with a professional understanding of Gamification. I will write much more about this later, but for now it is a transmedia project that will render phonetics fun and attractive through gamification designed to draw the children and other learners into the system.  

Below you can see the initial paintings from which the system will be crafted.

  These paintings will be digitized and then transformed into various games, posters and charts. (The letters will be sized and adjusted) 

There is a whole strategy evolving and this is only one small visual part. 

Do you have suggestions about how we can combat Fascism in Australia?  Soon I will write many articles about what the idea of a universal language could do for world peace.  But in the meantime, I would like to invite you to explore your ideas.  All ideas are welcome and no strategy is too silly to be considered worthy of a write up.

You could start an account here at Wizzley, or tell me your idea and I could interview you.  Just make a comment on the discussion boards below to start the conversation.