My favorite food is my mother's lasagne. As a child, I bounced with glee in the kitchen, when I saw the shopping bag filled with the ingredients. In truth, I do the same as an adult.
I also love pizza, and those Burger King cheese and chili balls. I'm partial to Stilton and broccoli soup; Brie with a slab of hot baked bread and cranberry sauce; pasta with pesto and pine nuts; grey peas and vegetarian bacon; Derby cakes and Welsh cakes.
Any one of these could be chosen as my last meal, if I was on Death Row. What would you choose?
On the final day, those about to die will be with their loved ones for an hour or two. Twelve family members and friends will be crowded into a room, where they can cuddle, cry and say goodbye face to face. Another sixteen will be allowed to talk remotely, with telephones through bullet-proof glass.
After that, the condemned is taken away to eat their last meal. How appetizing can that be? Filled with the upset and emotion of those final goodbyes, you are confronted with food. You know that it will be the last thing that you will ever eat.
It must taste like sawdust in their mouths. A brick in their stomach.
Everything that happens, that's seen, heard or felt, has a stamp of finality about it on that day. They know the exact time of their death. It won't be a kind death either. Even if things go right, then it will be terrifying and painful. Things frequently go wrong. Those are the most horrific of all premeditated killings.
All of these last sightings, last conversations, last glimpse of that brickwork, skylight or bed, is enough to send the most resolute individual half mad.
Yet still the blood-thirsty mob will slobber out the baying cries, "But they deserved it! They killed someone!" But so did you, when you allowed this to happen without a call to your representative nor a letter to the paper. "They showed no mercy to their victims!" And two wrongs apparently make it right.
No-one ever suggests that murder should go unpunished, nor any of the other terrible crimes. But for the average armchair serial killers, the only possible punishment is state sanctified slaughter. With no blood on their hands, it allows for silence and inaction to send a person to their death; and that is not humane.
I always welcome people sharing their views. That's what the debate is all about. Even if I disagree with the viewpoint. :) I absolutely do not support capital punishment.
Neither you nor I will be the ones making the final decisions. But I'm glad you've given me a chance to state my position plainly on this matter. I support capital punishment.
Yet an estimated one in ten person executed in the United States had an unsound conviction. Read here: http://wizzley.com/one-for-ten-innoce... This is an endemic problem.
Christie did it. His other victims all bore the same hallmarks as Mrs Evans and little Geraldine. Several died after Evans was hanged.
So Christie was a sadistic serial killer. But he was hanged by Albert Pierrepoint, the most prolific hangman that Britain ever produced. Christie was an unthinking savage. Pierrepoint must be applauded for what he did. Yet Pierrepoint killed far more people than Christie did. There are moral holes in this thinking, which I cannot reconcile. It involves having to consider the same thing from two separate directions, which can't be right.
As for the lack of regret etc, isn't that conflating murder with psychopathy?
There is a huge problem in what to actually do with those who commit criminal acts, up to and very much including murder. But murdering them isn't the answer to my mind.
There is an "ideal" that we must strive for. Ideally, "we" must carry out justice in such a way that injustice, i.e. convicting the wrong person, doesn't happen. We don't live in a perfect world. But don't let your heart bleed over separate issues. Miscarriage of justice is a different issue. And yes! No matter what you can not bring a dead innocent person back to life. Who would know that better than the victims of a crime?
BTW, so this guy Christie confessed? Let me play Devil's advocate here.
He telling the truth? or He telling authorities "something" so he can play with their heads. Mess with their minds and make 'em feel guilty about putting an innocent person to death. Because maybe ... just maybe ... even though I - John Reginald Halliday Christie - really am a savage sadistic serial killer, maybe I could make y'all feel guilty about KILLING ME!!!
Because you see I like killing people. But I can't imagine what it's like BEING KILLED!! My victims didn't know nothing. But me. I'll know when and I'll know why and I'll know how and I'll have to wait and wait and wait ... The waiting is punishment too! At least if I don't get the death penalty I could live out the rest of my days being useless like that pervert Richard Speck and not have to die for my crime! Read books about me and watch movies about me. Practically live like a celebrity.
Jo - You're comparing yourself - YOU, a person with a conscience and pure motives versus ... a reprobate individual with a mind who cares nothing about right or wrong, has no regrets their heinous acts, and who ain't got no regard for man or beast. He's just trying to save himself from a punishment he know he earned!
- Let's settle this between me and you. No death penalty. Just don't let the criminals serve out their sentence in an American prison. Send them to one of those prisons in a Middle Eastern country, where they don't have TV or a library, and FORGET ABOUT 'EM!!!
But that is to argue justice is taking the life of someone who took a life. What then of the executioner? That person just took a life.
And what about if the person just executed was innocent too? Timothy Evans was hanged pleading for his life and trying to get someone, anyone, to believe that he was innocent. He was innocent. A few years afterwards John Reginald Halliday Christie was revealed as a serial killer. He confessed that he'd killed Evans's wife and child, and framed him.
All the apologies in the world won't bring Timothy Evans back. Where is the weight of justice there?
Understood. I support the death penalty. So I guess I will have to be thrown into the pool of non-compassionate. To me it's a matter of justice. It is not murder. It is just punishment for the crime. No more than if your self-defense resulted in you killing somebody who was attacking you or someone you were trying to protect. In this scenario, for the attacker, the justice came from the hand of the intended victim. Capital penalty is the defense for the victim who didn't get defended in time of enough to save their life.
I love you my sister. I respect your views . But we are not on the same page with this issue. I'm done making comments because I can not be persuaded that capital punishment is unlawful. The weight of justice swings the scale in favor of the victim.
Richard Speck should have been executed.
Yes, I have absolute compassion for the victim too. But that doesn't mean that my compassion would find its outlet in murder. Not supporting the death penalty is absolutely not the same as condoning the crimes that these people did.
&JoHarrington - My sister. With the greatest of respect, I say this. Weigh the scales. Victims on one side of the scale. The murderer on the other side. The amount of the compassion you would have the murderer? Would it outweigh the compassion YOU would have shown another human being by NOT KILLING THEM!!
Can you imagine a victim screaming, pleading, begging for their lives - crying for mercy and compassion? Tell me truly that you would not placed the greater weight of YOUR compassion on the scale side with the victim. You don't have to answer this question publicly. It's something for you to ponder in your heart. Peace and love.
We can't all be the Apostle Paul; and he was doing it for his faith. I can't imagine anyone with compassion not shrinking from putting someone else to death.
Have you ever really imagined what it would be like? No. I can't say that have.
It depends on what I'm being put to death for. The Apostle Paul awaited his death with great anticipation for the future.
I'm not preaching at you. I'm just sayin'.
Good thoughts presented in this article. But you already know which "camp" I'm in.