18 months ago you needed only look at TNA for thirty seconds before turning off in disgust. Matches never had a genuine ending, security were breaking up at least 15 fights a night and Eric Bischoff and Hulk Hogan were in at least every other segment.
The company has undergone some radical changes since, whilst WWE, after a promising 2011 summer, seemed only to fall back into the dark-ages of 2009, with unoriginal storylines, uninspired feuds and screwy match finishes.
Setting aside the glitz and glam and obvious difference in the budget - would it be feasible to suggest that TNA has quietly overtaken WWE in terms of sheer entertainment and quality?

There have been 19 separate TNA World Heavyweight Championship reigns as of writing (not including when the company used the NWA title). Of these, only 6 are reigns by champions who had not previously been world champions in either WCW or WWE. TNA have often been accused of only giving their world title to guys who have been "made by other companies".
In 2011, Eric Bischoff was show to be on a rampage. His sole focus in life was the destruction of the X-Division, the high flying, death defying division the company had been founded upon. This storyline sadly reflected the common opinion of viewers, noticing that the division has literally been flushed down the toilet in recent years.


Whether it be D-Von fighting for the love of his sons, to AJ Styles fighting for answers about betrayal by his friends, every wrestler on the TNA roster has something to do. Whilst some wrestlers have very little air time, you'll rarely see one on screen without a purpose. There are no undercard jobbers subject to being squashed at the hands of a new pet project here.
Of course, nobody gets everything right, all of the time. This is evidenced through TNA's use of some of their titles. I've already praised their use of the World Heavyweight Title and X-Division title. Elsewhere they have found success with the Knockout's title with the return of the inaugural women's champion in Gail Kim.






House of Tudor - The Unlikely Dynastyon 06/12/2012
Wrestlemania 28 - John Cena vs The Rockon 03/26/2012
Bobby Roode vs James Storm - Main Event Prophecyon 03/25/2012


Comments
I completely agree with you. Speak to me 12 months ago and I would've laughed in your face. TNA just seemed to do such a 180, so fast. I'm also nuts about some of their personalities too - Sting and Bischoff inspire a wave of 90's WCW nostaligia in me, Jeff Hardy and Kurt Angle do likewise for the WWE Attitude Era, whilst Bobby Roode, AJ Styles, James Storm and even some of the lower-card such as Kazarian are just all-round fantastic workers, be that in ring, backstage or on the microphone.
Definitely point him in this direction, I'd be absolutely fascinated to read some independant articles, as I personally find the Bleacher Reports get far too easily brushed with the "smark bait" label.
I prefer WWE to TNA personally, but it has a lot to do with the personality of the wrestlers who work with each company.
I'm going to point my husband in this direction. I've been trying to get him to write about wrestling for a while now and his articles are so seasonal that it's difficult to keep him moving forward with them. I'm not sure he understands the "evergreen" concept. But that being said, he's still an awesome writer, and what he writes about is not only timely, but very interesting! Too bad he only has one article (on Squidoo).
He's thought about writing for Bleacher Report though.
Thankyou hun :D
This is potentially a bit more controversial (a lot), but credit where credit's due!
I just Tweeted this for you and someone called @WorldSuperior0 favourited it on Twitter. Go you!
And WorldSuperior0, if you're reading, hi! *waves*