From an Amazon marketing point of view, e-Readers should ideally become synonymous with Kindle. Lots of profit there from consumers following the herd and only buying this brand.
Naturally this incurs a dangerous line to walk. I did something a fortnight ago, which would have chilled the blood of any Amazon executive in earshot. I asked my parents for a kindle. Note the small 'k'.
I wasn't necessarily asking for the brand, but for an e-Reader. As soon as the request was granted, I began researching e-Readers in general. Amazon's Kindle was only foremost in those I examined.
If the brand crosses the line into describing a product in general, then it may lose its trademark protection, at least in some countries. Such generic words as aspirin*, kerosene and thermos started life as exclusive brand names. But when people started referring to all willow bark derivative painkillers as Aspirin, then it lost the capital letter and the company behind it lost the right to protect the name from competitiors.
(*It's been pointed out that Aspirin did not lose its trademark protection throughout the world. In fact, Bayer were able to safeguard its brand in 83 countries.)
Another exchange, this time between a friend and I, would have similarly upset Amazon's marketing team.
"Did you get a Kindle for your birthday?" He asked me.
"Yes!" I blithely responded. "I got a Kobo!" Then went on to tell him how wonderful it was reading Jane Eyre in the place where it was written.
You can almost imagine the gods of Amazon screaming out in desperation, "No! You didn't get a Kindle! You got a Kobo!"
Comments
Yep. :)
Right. I'd better get busy typing then.
I love those free eBook sites, because they tend to have a lot of history books. My Kobo is filled with them. I've taken to using Calibre to organize them all too.
The books ARE taking over the asylum here. And I have just discovered the most awesome of free e-book websites which triggered an idea in my head for a companion article to this and the one recently written by VHFolland about where to publish e-books. I went for an Android phone because it had more opportunities to download things than Apple-based products do. I may well go for a Kobo for the same reason.
I know what you mean about book space. My Wizzography starts with a photograph taken in my sitting room (http://wizzley.com/jo-harrington-a-cr... ), you can see how much I love my books, and how much space they take up.
That isn't all of my books in the picture by the way.
It was a lovely gift to receive. I doubt anything will ever take the place of an actual book in your hand, but this is a great second best. I love the way it bookmarks your page too. Such a little thing, but it turns down the corner at the top. I don't even do that with real books anymore, because it damages the pages. But it's fun to see it happen on the Kobo.
I'm currently sitting here with my auntie's Nook in front of me. That's good too. I
Aldous Huxley is turning in his grave. ;)
I'm indulging the best of both worlds. I have the Kobo, but I also have piles and piles of actual books. The Kobo is a new toy and therefore a novelty right now. I haven't had it long enough to work out all of the pros and cons yet.
The major pro so far is the fact that it's lightweight. I've spent my entire life lugging books around in my bag. I don't even know that the Kobo is there. Plus, when you're reading it, you lounge about even more lazily, for the same reasons.
Major con so far is that you don't know how much of the book you've got through. I didn't realize until now how much pleasure I get from glancing at my progress. I see x amount of pages left and that must trigger something nice inside. With a Kobo, you've just got endless digital pages until the book finishes.
The stories remain the same though.
Interesting exchange on use of trademark names. I'm not yet in the market for an e-Reader. Still got so many books on my shelves that have not yet been read that I think I'll go through them before I see what is available virtually. In spite of that, I really found your discussion of closed shop interesting. For some reason, I am having a hard time feeling like I belong to this "brave new world" (notice it is not capitalized).
Brenda - That is really bizarre, especially since Barnes and Noble developed the Nook! I've only had my Kobo for a week, but it's stood up to scrutiny and all that I've thrown at it so far.
Sam - I wonder if the confusion here is because we're a) stepping into a legal minefield, where there's a different between trademark, patents and trade names; and b) the source I'm referring to is talking about US law. Trademarks have infinite protection in the US, but that can be lost as soon as it becomes a verb.
In the US, you can happily call something an aspirin, even if it's not made by Bayer. But you couldn't call a computer an Apple, because they've retained the trademark protection there.
Basically we're talking about exclusivity. Think of the Duncan Yo-Yo trademark case in 1965. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yo-yo#Th...) Donald F. Duncan had stupidly released adverts with such slogans as, 'If it isn't a Duncan, it isn't a Yo-Yo'. That was used against the company in court.
Until then, you couldn't have said that your toy was a Yo-Yo, if you weren't part of the Duncan corporation. It would be like saying that my Kobo is a Kindle now. After that court-case, Yo-Yo became a legally generic world. Any company could use it. I could make one now and call it a Harrington Yo-Yo and Duncan couldn't touch me. They lost millions that way.
I've reworded it again for clarity.
Actually it is still not right, you can't lose a registered trademark simply because it became a generic word. Examples: 'to google' is now a generic verb / recognized verb, but Google still is a trademark. What you think of are trademarks based on generic words in the first place. like apple. Try to register Apple as a new trademark for a new computer line, bad luck (see http://www.apple.com/legal/trademark/...) but it would be perfectly possible to register it as a trademark for a new line of furniture as long as isn't already registered as a trademark by another furniture company. Trademarks can't be lost simply by entering our language as a generic term, sorry. SY
I have a Nook and I'm happy with it. The only problem is that every time I go to the B&N website to download a book they tell me I don't have a Kindle, and I have to call the company up. I'm really PO'ed about it right now and have been thinking of going to a Kindle. I mostly watch Netflix on mine when I go to bed at night. I also like to play the games. I'll check out the Kobo