William Garrow Invented Criminal Defence

by RupertTaylor

Trials in 18th century Britain were radically changed by a young barrister whose influence continues today in the English-speaking world.

Trials evolved from guilt or innocence being decided though armed combat. Later, the divine intervention of the Almighty was summoned to render judgement via painful ordeals of dunking in scolding water or having red hot iron applied to the flesh; if the accused suffered no injury from such assaults it was deemed that God had protected an innocent person.
By the 15th century juries began to emerge as the decision makers but they had little resemblance to the supposedly impartial arbiters of the fate of the accused that we have today.

No Rights for the Accused

Trials remained grossly unfair to the accused until well into the 18th century. Accused people, if charged with a capital offence, were not allowed to have a lawyer represent them. There were no rules about how evidence was presented and there was no presumption of innocence. Juries could be easily fixed to favour the wealthy over the poor.

Evidence was often given by shady characters known as thief catchers who were paid a bounty for bringing suspects to court. They were not concerned about guilt or innocence, their focus was on collecting the bounty. Many a blameless person went to the gallows based on the testimony of villainous bounty hunters.

The whole affair was tilted heavily in favour of the prosecution. A trial would only last a few minutes. Former barrister Clive Anderson writes (The Telegraph, October 2009) “…such cross-examination as there was was done by the judge or even the jury. Criminal defendants in the main were desperately poor or just desperate and the thief catchers and bounty hunters who testified against them often not much better.”

Lawyers mostly refused to represent such riff-raff. The accused might be allowed to make a brief statement and then the judge would tell the jury what verdict he expected from it. Jurors remained in the courtroom, chatted briefly among themselves, and then, usually, did the judge’s bidding. And, with more than 200 crimes carrying the death penalty, the hangman was kept very busy.

An 18th Century Public Hanging Re-enacted

The 1999 movie Plunkett and Macleane depicts the fate from which William Garrow’s advocacy saved many. (Point of accuracy: Criminals executed at Tyburn were suspended not hoisted up as shown).

The Invention of Cross-Examination

The bias against the accused began to change with the arrival of William Garrow. In 1784, he began his career as a barrister defending clients at a time when very few prisoners hired counsel.

Depiction of London’s Old Bailey court around the time that Sir William Garrow practiced there.The Daily Mail (November 2010) describes Garrow as “the Robin Hood of the courtroom…determined that the penniless, the ignorant and the weak would no longer be tried by corrupt officials and framed for crimes they did not commit. It was Garrow who coined the phrase ‘innocent until proven guilty.’ ”

William Garrow invented the art of cross-examination. This is the basis of trials today; the idea is that evidence must be tested for accuracy through questioning.

Garrow’s biographer John Hostettler says his questioning style “could be very, very aggressive…He often tripped up the witnesses; made them say what they really didn’t want to say, and admit what they didn’t want to admit. I would have thought it would be pretty terrifying.”

One observer said that Garrow “seemed, every now and then, to destroy, almost to annihilate, an adverse witness.”

Sir William Garrow: His Life, Times and Fight for Justice

Sir William Garrow was born in Middlesex, England in 1760. He entered the legal profession and became the dominant figure at Old Bailey - London's Central Criminal Court - from ...

View on Amazon

William Garrow Falls into Obscurity

Judge Francis Buller before whom William Garrow appeared frequently. James Gilray published this sketch suggesting the judge believed it acceptable for a man to beat his wife as long as the rod was no thicker than one’s thumb.In 1805, William Garrow was elected to Parliament and in 1811 he became Solicitor General for England and Wales; followed a year later by appointment to the post of Attorney General. He was knighted at the same time. He spent 15 years as a judge and died in 1840.

Despite his distinguished legal and political life, Sir William Garrow faded into history. Clive Anderson notes “Professor David Walker’s ‘Oxford Companion to the Law’ (1980), a comprehensive encyclopaedia of legal learning and lore” contains no mention of Garrow.

It wasn’t until 1991 that Sir William Garrow’s rightful place in legal history was recognized when John Beattie published an article about him in History Today. Since then, there has been a biography and a television series “Garrow’s Law” covering the lawyer’s exploits.



Garrow's Law: The Complete Collection

Legal drama ripped from the pages of history “[4stars]” —Scripps Howard News Service “Courtroom drama gold” —The Sunday Times(U.K.) “Period drama at its very best” —British Heri...

View on Amazon


“Garrow’s Guilty Secret.” Amanda Cable, The Daily Mail, November 26, 2010,

“Garrow Mini-Documentary.” The Garrow Society, October 19, 2011.

“Garrow’s Law Gives Credit to a Neglected Legal Hero.” Clive Anderson, The Telegraph, October 23, 2009.

The Garrow Society.

“Garrow for the Defence.” John Beattie, History Today, February 1991.

“Garrow’s Law.” BBC One, 2009 -

Updated: 04/02/2013, RupertTaylor
Thank you! Would you like to post a comment now?



You might also like

Hannah Snell: The Female Warrior

It began with a search for the husband who'd deserted her. It ended up on th...

A pictorial post of Jane Austen's House, Chawton, Hampshire

A holiday day out prompted me to think how blessed I was to be standing in HE...

Disclosure: This page generates income for authors based on affiliate relationships with our partners, including Amazon, Google and others.
Loading ...