Wedding days are fraught enough with nerves, without groups of protestors outside the doors waving banners insulting your very humanity.
And especially without your ceremony being stopped, because said protestors have issued a challenge in the courts regarding your mental competence to marry.
Yet that is precisely what happened to Victor Manuel Aguirre Espinoza and Fernando Urias Amparo, when they attempted to marry in Mexicali, Baja California. It brought them face to face with a local Christian group equally determined to destroy the marriage.
The backlash has been felt around the world alongside the hashtag #MisDerechosNoSonLocura (My Rights Are Not Crazy).
Comments
*nod nod nod* With a hearty *hear hear*.
If anyone creates hell on Earth, they should not be too surprised if that is where they finish up when they die.
I think the events in Paris and Belgian just recently are testimony enough to me. I think that if anyone feels the need to kill, maim or deny the rights of anyone in the name of their religion, then they really need to be taking a long, hard look at their religion. Is it worth defending anything that requires so much blood and misery?
From all I know of Jesus Christ, Allah and all those wonderful wisdom bringers, there was no directive for discord, let alone fighting and denial of civil/human rights.
Without freedom of conscience we create hell on Earth.
I'm nodding right along with you in agreement here. It does seem incredible to me that such laws aren't applied universally.
It is essential that gay couples enjoy the same legal protection as heterosexual couples. That their home country would not honour a wedding from another part of the country is morally wrong and a serious flaw in Mexico's political system.
Beyond the politics, there's further life issues. Married couples have certain rights, like joint insurance, health access etc. If the couple married in a different county, then their own home county wouldn't honour it.
As for the rest, then I'm nodding here in utter agreement.
I am not impressed by either side in this case. The couple could have married elsewhere in Mexico and left confrontation out of the wedding, which is not the place for it. On the other hand, the group opposing them are to be seriously criticized. Lying about bomb threats, and officials refusing to do the duty they are paid for are wrongful acts. If the courts had permitted the wedding it should have gone ahead and no official obstructed it. Worse is to make false accusations about the couple's sanity. Don't the accusers know that the church teaches that lying to harm someone is a serious sin?
This is the perennial problem with fanatics: they are so obsessed with their goals they deny their own principles to attain them. To protect heterosexual marriage, which was not under threat anyway, they have lied, disobeyed the law and misused power.
You and me both. The opposition does seem to be getting a little desperate now. I wonder if the couple could have them for harassment?
Wow. How frustrating. I hope the global outcry does do a lot for helping them get their rights without having to get around any more ridiculous and unnecessary obstacles.