Unfortunately, Bloomberg and the Obama administration come from a place that is very consistent
with the political direction we've been moving towards.
Consider Bloomberg...
You can't, for example, demand that health care be an entitlement without surrendering power over the very personal decisions about what you eat and do with your body. If the cost for your health care is to be shared with your neighbor, your neighbor rightfully has an interest in your lifestyle choices.
Obama's response to the middle east protests and violence is similarly consistent.
We live in a place where many of us are increasingly demanding a right to feel good about ourselves and when we don't, we demand government action. Indeed, speech is increasingly being restricted in response to these demands.
Valedictorian speeches must be approved to avoid offending religious sensibilities. Kids wearing T-Shirts with the American flag are sent home because they may offend fellow students celebrating Cinco de Mayo.
Lest you think that abridging speech only occurs in schools, lets not forget the attacks directed towards speech because a lunatic shot Gabby Giffords. Within hours of the shooting, pundits, politicians and commentators had established that conservative radio voices and cable news personalities were at fault.
The message here is clear. There are those that have come to believe that free speech causes people to have low self esteem and act violently and therefore ought to be restricted.
Is it any surprise that a piece of crap video is to blame for unrest in the Middle East and that mainstream pundits have suggested that the producer be held accountable?



Comments
capnfatzSep 24, 2012
ThamisgithSep 23, 2012
Sorry to say that we have got just the same mindset over here these days.
Well said by the way.
capnfatzSep 21, 2012
TiggeredSep 21, 2012
I'm wondering what percentage of your readers actually is American? Just a thought :)